Evidence for increased olfactory receptor gene repertoire size in two nocturnal bird species with well-developed olfactory ability

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In vertebrates, the molecular basis of the sense of smell is encoded by members of a large gene family, namely olfactory receptor (OR) genes. Both the total number of OR genes and the proportion of intact OR genes in a genome may ind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steiger Silke S, Fidler Andrew E, Kempenaers Bart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-05-01
Series:BMC Evolutionary Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/9/117
_version_ 1818381892053893120
author Steiger Silke S
Fidler Andrew E
Kempenaers Bart
author_facet Steiger Silke S
Fidler Andrew E
Kempenaers Bart
author_sort Steiger Silke S
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In vertebrates, the molecular basis of the sense of smell is encoded by members of a large gene family, namely olfactory receptor (OR) genes. Both the total number of OR genes and the proportion of intact OR genes in a genome may indicate the importance of the sense of smell for an animal. There is behavioral, physiological, and anatomical evidence that some bird species, in particular nocturnal birds, have a well developed sense of smell. Therefore, we hypothesized that nocturnal birds with good olfactory abilities have evolved (i) more OR genes and (ii) more intact OR genes than closely related and presumably less 'olfaction-dependent' day-active avian taxa.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We used both non-radioactive Southern hybridization and PCR with degenerate primers to investigate whether two nocturnal bird species that are known to rely on olfactory cues, the brown kiwi (<it>Apteryx australis</it>) and the kakapo (<it>Strigops habroptilus</it>), have evolved a larger OR gene repertoire than their day-active, closest living relatives (for kiwi the emu <it>Dromaius novaehollandiae</it>, rhea <it>Rhea americana</it>, and ostrich <it>Struthio camelus </it>and for kakapo the kaka <it>Nestor meridionalis </it>and kea <it>Nestor notabilis</it>). We show that the nocturnal birds did not have a significantly higher proportion of intact OR genes. However, the estimated total number of OR genes was larger in the two nocturnal birds than in their relatives.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results suggest that ecological niche adaptations such as daily activity patterns may have shaped avian OR gene repertoires.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-14T02:41:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cde81e2cf9464c5cb8497664354e77e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2148
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T02:41:47Z
publishDate 2009-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Evolutionary Biology
spelling doaj.art-cde81e2cf9464c5cb8497664354e77e52022-12-21T23:19:59ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482009-05-019111710.1186/1471-2148-9-117Evidence for increased olfactory receptor gene repertoire size in two nocturnal bird species with well-developed olfactory abilitySteiger Silke SFidler Andrew EKempenaers Bart<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In vertebrates, the molecular basis of the sense of smell is encoded by members of a large gene family, namely olfactory receptor (OR) genes. Both the total number of OR genes and the proportion of intact OR genes in a genome may indicate the importance of the sense of smell for an animal. There is behavioral, physiological, and anatomical evidence that some bird species, in particular nocturnal birds, have a well developed sense of smell. Therefore, we hypothesized that nocturnal birds with good olfactory abilities have evolved (i) more OR genes and (ii) more intact OR genes than closely related and presumably less 'olfaction-dependent' day-active avian taxa.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We used both non-radioactive Southern hybridization and PCR with degenerate primers to investigate whether two nocturnal bird species that are known to rely on olfactory cues, the brown kiwi (<it>Apteryx australis</it>) and the kakapo (<it>Strigops habroptilus</it>), have evolved a larger OR gene repertoire than their day-active, closest living relatives (for kiwi the emu <it>Dromaius novaehollandiae</it>, rhea <it>Rhea americana</it>, and ostrich <it>Struthio camelus </it>and for kakapo the kaka <it>Nestor meridionalis </it>and kea <it>Nestor notabilis</it>). We show that the nocturnal birds did not have a significantly higher proportion of intact OR genes. However, the estimated total number of OR genes was larger in the two nocturnal birds than in their relatives.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results suggest that ecological niche adaptations such as daily activity patterns may have shaped avian OR gene repertoires.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/9/117
spellingShingle Steiger Silke S
Fidler Andrew E
Kempenaers Bart
Evidence for increased olfactory receptor gene repertoire size in two nocturnal bird species with well-developed olfactory ability
BMC Evolutionary Biology
title Evidence for increased olfactory receptor gene repertoire size in two nocturnal bird species with well-developed olfactory ability
title_full Evidence for increased olfactory receptor gene repertoire size in two nocturnal bird species with well-developed olfactory ability
title_fullStr Evidence for increased olfactory receptor gene repertoire size in two nocturnal bird species with well-developed olfactory ability
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for increased olfactory receptor gene repertoire size in two nocturnal bird species with well-developed olfactory ability
title_short Evidence for increased olfactory receptor gene repertoire size in two nocturnal bird species with well-developed olfactory ability
title_sort evidence for increased olfactory receptor gene repertoire size in two nocturnal bird species with well developed olfactory ability
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/9/117
work_keys_str_mv AT steigersilkes evidenceforincreasedolfactoryreceptorgenerepertoiresizeintwonocturnalbirdspecieswithwelldevelopedolfactoryability
AT fidlerandrewe evidenceforincreasedolfactoryreceptorgenerepertoiresizeintwonocturnalbirdspecieswithwelldevelopedolfactoryability
AT kempenaersbart evidenceforincreasedolfactoryreceptorgenerepertoiresizeintwonocturnalbirdspecieswithwelldevelopedolfactoryability