Using Various Analysis Center Products to Assess the Time-Frequency Transfer Performance of GPS/Galileo/BDS PPPAR Methods

Numerous organizations and Analysis Centers (AC) currently offer various Ambiguity Resolution (AR) products using various methodologies. However, there are no associated studies on their use for time-frequency transfer. This paper examines 16 Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) stations with external high-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mingjun Ouyang, Xiangwei Zhu, Ruite Yi, Daqian Lyu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/1/92
_version_ 1797431311040774144
author Mingjun Ouyang
Xiangwei Zhu
Ruite Yi
Daqian Lyu
author_facet Mingjun Ouyang
Xiangwei Zhu
Ruite Yi
Daqian Lyu
author_sort Mingjun Ouyang
collection DOAJ
description Numerous organizations and Analysis Centers (AC) currently offer various Ambiguity Resolution (AR) products using various methodologies. However, there are no associated studies on their use for time-frequency transfer. This paper examines 16 Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) stations with external high-precision atomic clocks to constitute 15 international time comparison links, and uses AR products data from CNES, SGG, CODE, and PRIDE laboratories, using three ambiguity-fixed strategies, to thoroughly evaluate the effects of various strategies and AR products for high-precision time-frequency transfer. We reach the following results by using the IGS final clock product as a reference and comparing it to ambiguity-float. With various ambiguity-fixed procedures, the time stability Standard Deviation (STD) of time transfer is increased for a single GPS, and the improvement ranges from 10 to 40%. The frequency stability has barely improved; up to 40%, the most notable improvement comes from FCB with GRM products. The time stability STD of combinations has improved after the addition of the Galileo system compared to the single GPS, and the improvement ranges from 2 to 9%. Most strategies have been improved, while a few techniques have been weakened with the GEC (GPS + Galileo + BDS) combination. We feel that the stability has not significantly increased with the systems’ increase in terms of short-term stability after comparing multiple groups of linkages.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:42:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cde8cbed3ede4fdf9bfc2364f44f6fbc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:42:05Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-cde8cbed3ede4fdf9bfc2364f44f6fbc2023-12-02T00:50:54ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922022-12-011519210.3390/rs15010092Using Various Analysis Center Products to Assess the Time-Frequency Transfer Performance of GPS/Galileo/BDS PPPAR MethodsMingjun Ouyang0Xiangwei Zhu1Ruite Yi2Daqian Lyu3School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSchool of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaShenzhen Key Laboratory of Navigation and Communication Integration, Shenzhen 518125, ChinaCollege of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, ChinaNumerous organizations and Analysis Centers (AC) currently offer various Ambiguity Resolution (AR) products using various methodologies. However, there are no associated studies on their use for time-frequency transfer. This paper examines 16 Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) stations with external high-precision atomic clocks to constitute 15 international time comparison links, and uses AR products data from CNES, SGG, CODE, and PRIDE laboratories, using three ambiguity-fixed strategies, to thoroughly evaluate the effects of various strategies and AR products for high-precision time-frequency transfer. We reach the following results by using the IGS final clock product as a reference and comparing it to ambiguity-float. With various ambiguity-fixed procedures, the time stability Standard Deviation (STD) of time transfer is increased for a single GPS, and the improvement ranges from 10 to 40%. The frequency stability has barely improved; up to 40%, the most notable improvement comes from FCB with GRM products. The time stability STD of combinations has improved after the addition of the Galileo system compared to the single GPS, and the improvement ranges from 2 to 9%. Most strategies have been improved, while a few techniques have been weakened with the GEC (GPS + Galileo + BDS) combination. We feel that the stability has not significantly increased with the systems’ increase in terms of short-term stability after comparing multiple groups of linkages.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/1/92time-frequency transferprecise point positioningambiguity resolution (AR)analysis center (AC)
spellingShingle Mingjun Ouyang
Xiangwei Zhu
Ruite Yi
Daqian Lyu
Using Various Analysis Center Products to Assess the Time-Frequency Transfer Performance of GPS/Galileo/BDS PPPAR Methods
Remote Sensing
time-frequency transfer
precise point positioning
ambiguity resolution (AR)
analysis center (AC)
title Using Various Analysis Center Products to Assess the Time-Frequency Transfer Performance of GPS/Galileo/BDS PPPAR Methods
title_full Using Various Analysis Center Products to Assess the Time-Frequency Transfer Performance of GPS/Galileo/BDS PPPAR Methods
title_fullStr Using Various Analysis Center Products to Assess the Time-Frequency Transfer Performance of GPS/Galileo/BDS PPPAR Methods
title_full_unstemmed Using Various Analysis Center Products to Assess the Time-Frequency Transfer Performance of GPS/Galileo/BDS PPPAR Methods
title_short Using Various Analysis Center Products to Assess the Time-Frequency Transfer Performance of GPS/Galileo/BDS PPPAR Methods
title_sort using various analysis center products to assess the time frequency transfer performance of gps galileo bds pppar methods
topic time-frequency transfer
precise point positioning
ambiguity resolution (AR)
analysis center (AC)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/1/92
work_keys_str_mv AT mingjunouyang usingvariousanalysiscenterproductstoassessthetimefrequencytransferperformanceofgpsgalileobdsppparmethods
AT xiangweizhu usingvariousanalysiscenterproductstoassessthetimefrequencytransferperformanceofgpsgalileobdsppparmethods
AT ruiteyi usingvariousanalysiscenterproductstoassessthetimefrequencytransferperformanceofgpsgalileobdsppparmethods
AT daqianlyu usingvariousanalysiscenterproductstoassessthetimefrequencytransferperformanceofgpsgalileobdsppparmethods