The Building Blocks of Circular Economies: Rethinking Prehistoric Turf Architecture Through Archaeological and Architectural Analysis
Research into prehistoric buildings in northwest Europe has identified the ubiquitous use of turf. The study first introduces direct and proxy evidence for the material’s detection in the field, then analyses individual case studies to demonstrate how this locally available and renewable material sh...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | Open Archaeology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0331 |
| _version_ | 1797405135971811328 |
|---|---|
| author | Romankiewicz Tanja |
| author_facet | Romankiewicz Tanja |
| author_sort | Romankiewicz Tanja |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Research into prehistoric buildings in northwest Europe has identified the ubiquitous use of turf. The study first introduces direct and proxy evidence for the material’s detection in the field, then analyses individual case studies to demonstrate how this locally available and renewable material shaped buildings and building practices. Turf, grown and sourced on or near a site, ties buildings to their landscape, while creating flexible shells that can shift as needed, metamorphosing built space and volume accordingly. Turf’s capacity to then compost and regrow embeds its buildings into a prehistoric circular economy that interweaves dwellings, people, animals, plants, soils, and nutrients into a holistic understanding of a “curated” rather than a “built” environment – an architecture borrowed from the soil to which it can return. The characteristics of turf blocks as a malleable and arguably metamorphosing building material call for a rethink of turf architecture, not resulting in static products but in ongoing circular processes. This new concept operates within an extended lifecycle of houses, not as in traditional approaches from birth (built) to death (abandoned), but within a cyclical, cradle-to-cradle approach. An experimental training project now translates this prehistoric cyclical model into modern sustainable turf building practice to demonstrate its potential for positive climate action today. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T03:06:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-cdf2e6cfcdc54107aa8ee3287fa56751 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2300-6560 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T03:06:24Z |
| publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
| publisher | De Gruyter |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Open Archaeology |
| spelling | doaj.art-cdf2e6cfcdc54107aa8ee3287fa567512023-12-04T08:00:13ZengDe GruyterOpen Archaeology2300-65602023-11-0191pp. 515810.1515/opar-2022-0331The Building Blocks of Circular Economies: Rethinking Prehistoric Turf Architecture Through Archaeological and Architectural AnalysisRomankiewicz Tanja0School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, United KingdomResearch into prehistoric buildings in northwest Europe has identified the ubiquitous use of turf. The study first introduces direct and proxy evidence for the material’s detection in the field, then analyses individual case studies to demonstrate how this locally available and renewable material shaped buildings and building practices. Turf, grown and sourced on or near a site, ties buildings to their landscape, while creating flexible shells that can shift as needed, metamorphosing built space and volume accordingly. Turf’s capacity to then compost and regrow embeds its buildings into a prehistoric circular economy that interweaves dwellings, people, animals, plants, soils, and nutrients into a holistic understanding of a “curated” rather than a “built” environment – an architecture borrowed from the soil to which it can return. The characteristics of turf blocks as a malleable and arguably metamorphosing building material call for a rethink of turf architecture, not resulting in static products but in ongoing circular processes. This new concept operates within an extended lifecycle of houses, not as in traditional approaches from birth (built) to death (abandoned), but within a cyclical, cradle-to-cradle approach. An experimental training project now translates this prehistoric cyclical model into modern sustainable turf building practice to demonstrate its potential for positive climate action today.https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0331prehistoryturf architecturemicromorphologycircular economiesclimate action |
| spellingShingle | Romankiewicz Tanja The Building Blocks of Circular Economies: Rethinking Prehistoric Turf Architecture Through Archaeological and Architectural Analysis Open Archaeology prehistory turf architecture micromorphology circular economies climate action |
| title | The Building Blocks of Circular Economies: Rethinking Prehistoric Turf Architecture Through Archaeological and Architectural Analysis |
| title_full | The Building Blocks of Circular Economies: Rethinking Prehistoric Turf Architecture Through Archaeological and Architectural Analysis |
| title_fullStr | The Building Blocks of Circular Economies: Rethinking Prehistoric Turf Architecture Through Archaeological and Architectural Analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Building Blocks of Circular Economies: Rethinking Prehistoric Turf Architecture Through Archaeological and Architectural Analysis |
| title_short | The Building Blocks of Circular Economies: Rethinking Prehistoric Turf Architecture Through Archaeological and Architectural Analysis |
| title_sort | building blocks of circular economies rethinking prehistoric turf architecture through archaeological and architectural analysis |
| topic | prehistory turf architecture micromorphology circular economies climate action |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2022-0331 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT romankiewicztanja thebuildingblocksofcirculareconomiesrethinkingprehistoricturfarchitecturethrougharchaeologicalandarchitecturalanalysis AT romankiewicztanja buildingblocksofcirculareconomiesrethinkingprehistoricturfarchitecturethrougharchaeologicalandarchitecturalanalysis |