Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): is routinization problematic?
Abstract Background The introduction and wide application of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has triggered further evolution of routines in the practice of prenatal diagnosis. ‘Routinization’ of prenatal diagnosis however has been associated with hampered informed choice and eugenic attitudes o...
Main Authors: | Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Daniëlle R. M. Timmermans, Aviad Raz |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Ethics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00970-5 |
Similar Items
-
The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)
by: Sophie Montgomery, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
The value of non-invasive prenatal testing: preferences of Canadian pregnant women, their partners, and health professionals regarding NIPT use and access
by: Stanislav Birko, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals
by: A. Kater-Kuipers, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Terminal deletion of chromosome 13 in a fetus with normal NIPT: The added value of invasive prenatal diagnosis in the NIPT era
by: Evy Vervecken, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences
by: Alexandra Cernat, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)