Do community measures impact the effectiveness of a community led HIV testing intervention. Secondary analysis of an HIV self-testing intervention in rural communities in Zimbabwe

Abstract Background There is a growing body of evidence for the role that communities can have in producing beneficial health outcomes. There is also an increasing recognition of the effectiveness and success of community-led interventions to promote public health efforts. This study investigated wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katherine A. Thomas, Euphemia Lindelwe Sibanda, Cheryl Johnson, Constancia Watadzaushe, Getrude Ncube, Karin Hatzold, Mary K. Tumushime, Miriam Mutseta, Nancy Ruhode, Peach P. Indravudh, Frances M. Cowan, Melissa Neuman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-10-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08695-x
_version_ 1797637073570627584
author Katherine A. Thomas
Euphemia Lindelwe Sibanda
Cheryl Johnson
Constancia Watadzaushe
Getrude Ncube
Karin Hatzold
Mary K. Tumushime
Miriam Mutseta
Nancy Ruhode
Peach P. Indravudh
Frances M. Cowan
Melissa Neuman
author_facet Katherine A. Thomas
Euphemia Lindelwe Sibanda
Cheryl Johnson
Constancia Watadzaushe
Getrude Ncube
Karin Hatzold
Mary K. Tumushime
Miriam Mutseta
Nancy Ruhode
Peach P. Indravudh
Frances M. Cowan
Melissa Neuman
author_sort Katherine A. Thomas
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background There is a growing body of evidence for the role that communities can have in producing beneficial health outcomes. There is also an increasing recognition of the effectiveness and success of community-led interventions to promote public health efforts. This study investigated whether and how community-level measures facilitate a community-led intervention to achieve improved HIV outcomes. Methods This is a secondary analysis of survey data from a cluster randomised trial in 40 rural communities in Zimbabwe. The survey was conducted four months after the intervention was initiated. Communities were randomised 1:1 to either paid distribution arm, where HIV self-test (HIVST) kits were distributed by a paid distributor, or community-led whereby members of the community were responsible for organising and conducting the distribution of HIVST kits. We used mixed effects logistic regression to assess the effect of social cohesion, problem solving, and HIV awareness on HIV testing and prevention. Results We found no association between community measures and the three HIV outcomes (self-testing, new HIV diagnosis and linkage to VMMC or confirmatory testing). However, the interaction analyses highlighted that in high social cohesion communities, the odds of new HIV diagnosis was greater in the community-led arm than paid distribution arm (OR 2.06 95% CI 1.03–4.19). Conclusion We found some evidence that community-led interventions reached more undiagnosed people living with HIV in places with high social cohesion. Additional research should seek to understand whether the effect of social cohesion is persistent across other community interventions and outcomes. Trial registration PACTR201607001701788.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:44:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ce079130ee0b4fe6b2a8a4a3f8ba8f69
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2334
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:44:09Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj.art-ce079130ee0b4fe6b2a8a4a3f8ba8f692023-11-05T12:08:52ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342023-10-0122S111110.1186/s12879-023-08695-xDo community measures impact the effectiveness of a community led HIV testing intervention. Secondary analysis of an HIV self-testing intervention in rural communities in ZimbabweKatherine A. Thomas0Euphemia Lindelwe Sibanda1Cheryl Johnson2Constancia Watadzaushe3Getrude Ncube4Karin Hatzold5Mary K. Tumushime6Miriam Mutseta7Nancy Ruhode8Peach P. Indravudh9Frances M. Cowan10Melissa Neuman11London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)Centre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR) ZimbabweHIV, Hepatitis and STI Department, World Health OrganisationCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR) ZimbabweMinistry of Health and Child WelfarePopulation Services InternationalCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR) ZimbabweDepartment of Sexual Reproductive Health Rights and Innovations, Population Services International ZimbabweCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR) ZimbabweLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)Centre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR) ZimbabweLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)Abstract Background There is a growing body of evidence for the role that communities can have in producing beneficial health outcomes. There is also an increasing recognition of the effectiveness and success of community-led interventions to promote public health efforts. This study investigated whether and how community-level measures facilitate a community-led intervention to achieve improved HIV outcomes. Methods This is a secondary analysis of survey data from a cluster randomised trial in 40 rural communities in Zimbabwe. The survey was conducted four months after the intervention was initiated. Communities were randomised 1:1 to either paid distribution arm, where HIV self-test (HIVST) kits were distributed by a paid distributor, or community-led whereby members of the community were responsible for organising and conducting the distribution of HIVST kits. We used mixed effects logistic regression to assess the effect of social cohesion, problem solving, and HIV awareness on HIV testing and prevention. Results We found no association between community measures and the three HIV outcomes (self-testing, new HIV diagnosis and linkage to VMMC or confirmatory testing). However, the interaction analyses highlighted that in high social cohesion communities, the odds of new HIV diagnosis was greater in the community-led arm than paid distribution arm (OR 2.06 95% CI 1.03–4.19). Conclusion We found some evidence that community-led interventions reached more undiagnosed people living with HIV in places with high social cohesion. Additional research should seek to understand whether the effect of social cohesion is persistent across other community interventions and outcomes. Trial registration PACTR201607001701788.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08695-xCommunity cohesionHIV self-testingCommunity-led
spellingShingle Katherine A. Thomas
Euphemia Lindelwe Sibanda
Cheryl Johnson
Constancia Watadzaushe
Getrude Ncube
Karin Hatzold
Mary K. Tumushime
Miriam Mutseta
Nancy Ruhode
Peach P. Indravudh
Frances M. Cowan
Melissa Neuman
Do community measures impact the effectiveness of a community led HIV testing intervention. Secondary analysis of an HIV self-testing intervention in rural communities in Zimbabwe
BMC Infectious Diseases
Community cohesion
HIV self-testing
Community-led
title Do community measures impact the effectiveness of a community led HIV testing intervention. Secondary analysis of an HIV self-testing intervention in rural communities in Zimbabwe
title_full Do community measures impact the effectiveness of a community led HIV testing intervention. Secondary analysis of an HIV self-testing intervention in rural communities in Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Do community measures impact the effectiveness of a community led HIV testing intervention. Secondary analysis of an HIV self-testing intervention in rural communities in Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Do community measures impact the effectiveness of a community led HIV testing intervention. Secondary analysis of an HIV self-testing intervention in rural communities in Zimbabwe
title_short Do community measures impact the effectiveness of a community led HIV testing intervention. Secondary analysis of an HIV self-testing intervention in rural communities in Zimbabwe
title_sort do community measures impact the effectiveness of a community led hiv testing intervention secondary analysis of an hiv self testing intervention in rural communities in zimbabwe
topic Community cohesion
HIV self-testing
Community-led
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08695-x
work_keys_str_mv AT katherineathomas docommunitymeasuresimpacttheeffectivenessofacommunityledhivtestinginterventionsecondaryanalysisofanhivselftestinginterventioninruralcommunitiesinzimbabwe
AT euphemialindelwesibanda docommunitymeasuresimpacttheeffectivenessofacommunityledhivtestinginterventionsecondaryanalysisofanhivselftestinginterventioninruralcommunitiesinzimbabwe
AT cheryljohnson docommunitymeasuresimpacttheeffectivenessofacommunityledhivtestinginterventionsecondaryanalysisofanhivselftestinginterventioninruralcommunitiesinzimbabwe
AT constanciawatadzaushe docommunitymeasuresimpacttheeffectivenessofacommunityledhivtestinginterventionsecondaryanalysisofanhivselftestinginterventioninruralcommunitiesinzimbabwe
AT getrudencube docommunitymeasuresimpacttheeffectivenessofacommunityledhivtestinginterventionsecondaryanalysisofanhivselftestinginterventioninruralcommunitiesinzimbabwe
AT karinhatzold docommunitymeasuresimpacttheeffectivenessofacommunityledhivtestinginterventionsecondaryanalysisofanhivselftestinginterventioninruralcommunitiesinzimbabwe
AT maryktumushime docommunitymeasuresimpacttheeffectivenessofacommunityledhivtestinginterventionsecondaryanalysisofanhivselftestinginterventioninruralcommunitiesinzimbabwe
AT miriammutseta docommunitymeasuresimpacttheeffectivenessofacommunityledhivtestinginterventionsecondaryanalysisofanhivselftestinginterventioninruralcommunitiesinzimbabwe
AT nancyruhode docommunitymeasuresimpacttheeffectivenessofacommunityledhivtestinginterventionsecondaryanalysisofanhivselftestinginterventioninruralcommunitiesinzimbabwe
AT peachpindravudh docommunitymeasuresimpacttheeffectivenessofacommunityledhivtestinginterventionsecondaryanalysisofanhivselftestinginterventioninruralcommunitiesinzimbabwe
AT francesmcowan docommunitymeasuresimpacttheeffectivenessofacommunityledhivtestinginterventionsecondaryanalysisofanhivselftestinginterventioninruralcommunitiesinzimbabwe
AT melissaneuman docommunitymeasuresimpacttheeffectivenessofacommunityledhivtestinginterventionsecondaryanalysisofanhivselftestinginterventioninruralcommunitiesinzimbabwe