What impact do assumptions about missing data have on conclusions? A practical sensitivity analysis for a cancer survival registry
Abstract Background Within epidemiological and clinical research, missing data are a common issue and often over looked in publications. When the issue of missing observations is addressed it is usually assumed that the missing data are ‘missing at random’ (MAR). This assumption should be checked fo...
Main Authors: | M. Smuk, J. R. Carpenter, T. P. Morris |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0301-0 |
Similar Items
-
Model Selection with Missing Data Embedded in Missing-at-Random Data
by: Keiji Takai, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01) -
A simplified eye-opener on managing missing data and in evaluation of non-response bias in medical research: a narrative review
by: P. K. B. Mahesh, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Variable screening with missing covariates: a discussion of ‘statistical inference for nonignorable missing data problems: a selective review’ by Niansheng Tang and Yuanyuan Ju
by: Fang Fang, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Impact on Cronbach's alpha of simple treatment methods for missing data
by: Béland, Sébastien, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Filling the gap in food and nutrition security data: What imputation method is best for Africa's food and nutrition security?
by: Adusei Bofa, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)