Adapting Helping Babies Breathe into a Virtual Curriculum: Methods, Results, and Lessons Learned

Introduction . The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) curriculum is an established, effective method to combat neonatal mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted in-person HBB training sessions worldwide, portending deficits in the dissemination of this important intervention. Methods . A pilot study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Celia Sobelman MD, Kristen Richard MD, Patricia McQuilkin MD, Nisha Fahey DO
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-05-01
Series:Global Pediatric Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X211019698
_version_ 1818596666016530432
author Celia Sobelman MD
Kristen Richard MD
Patricia McQuilkin MD
Nisha Fahey DO
author_facet Celia Sobelman MD
Kristen Richard MD
Patricia McQuilkin MD
Nisha Fahey DO
author_sort Celia Sobelman MD
collection DOAJ
description Introduction . The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) curriculum is an established, effective method to combat neonatal mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted in-person HBB training sessions worldwide, portending deficits in the dissemination of this important intervention. Methods . A pilot study to compare in-person versus virtual HBB training among US-based pediatric and family medicine residents. Two HBB master trainers condensed the curriculum into an abbreviated course that was offered to 14 learners in-person (n = 6) and virtually via Zoom (n = 8). A standardized 10-item survey was administered before and after the session to measure reported self-efficacy of critical elements of HBB. Difference of difference analysis was performed to detect differences in post vs pre-training results among the 2 groups using STATA MP 15. Results . All learners showed improvement in preparedness, assessment, and skills subcomponents of self-efficacy with no notable differences based on the type of learning medium. At baseline, in-person learners had a 7-point higher self-efficacy score (69.7) in comparison to virtual learners (62.8; P  = .26). After training, the confidence score improved significantly; by 14.3 units for in-person learners ( P  = .01) and 12.9 for virtual learners ( P  = .04). There was no statistically significant difference in improvement between the 2 groups ( P  = .67). Furthermore, all learners passed the post-training knowledge assessment. Discussion . Virtual learning of HBB may be an alternative option in the setting of resource and travel limitations. Future work needs to assess possible differences in attainment of assessment skills and retention of the HBB curriculum among virtual learners.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T11:35:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ce1f5dfd9fc747919f91e2fb9ed0cea2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2333-794X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T11:35:32Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Global Pediatric Health
spelling doaj.art-ce1f5dfd9fc747919f91e2fb9ed0cea22022-12-21T22:33:07ZengSAGE PublishingGlobal Pediatric Health2333-794X2021-05-01810.1177/2333794X211019698Adapting Helping Babies Breathe into a Virtual Curriculum: Methods, Results, and Lessons LearnedCelia Sobelman MD0Kristen Richard MD1Patricia McQuilkin MD2Nisha Fahey DO3Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USADepartment of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USADepartment of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USADepartment of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USAIntroduction . The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) curriculum is an established, effective method to combat neonatal mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted in-person HBB training sessions worldwide, portending deficits in the dissemination of this important intervention. Methods . A pilot study to compare in-person versus virtual HBB training among US-based pediatric and family medicine residents. Two HBB master trainers condensed the curriculum into an abbreviated course that was offered to 14 learners in-person (n = 6) and virtually via Zoom (n = 8). A standardized 10-item survey was administered before and after the session to measure reported self-efficacy of critical elements of HBB. Difference of difference analysis was performed to detect differences in post vs pre-training results among the 2 groups using STATA MP 15. Results . All learners showed improvement in preparedness, assessment, and skills subcomponents of self-efficacy with no notable differences based on the type of learning medium. At baseline, in-person learners had a 7-point higher self-efficacy score (69.7) in comparison to virtual learners (62.8; P  = .26). After training, the confidence score improved significantly; by 14.3 units for in-person learners ( P  = .01) and 12.9 for virtual learners ( P  = .04). There was no statistically significant difference in improvement between the 2 groups ( P  = .67). Furthermore, all learners passed the post-training knowledge assessment. Discussion . Virtual learning of HBB may be an alternative option in the setting of resource and travel limitations. Future work needs to assess possible differences in attainment of assessment skills and retention of the HBB curriculum among virtual learners.https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X211019698
spellingShingle Celia Sobelman MD
Kristen Richard MD
Patricia McQuilkin MD
Nisha Fahey DO
Adapting Helping Babies Breathe into a Virtual Curriculum: Methods, Results, and Lessons Learned
Global Pediatric Health
title Adapting Helping Babies Breathe into a Virtual Curriculum: Methods, Results, and Lessons Learned
title_full Adapting Helping Babies Breathe into a Virtual Curriculum: Methods, Results, and Lessons Learned
title_fullStr Adapting Helping Babies Breathe into a Virtual Curriculum: Methods, Results, and Lessons Learned
title_full_unstemmed Adapting Helping Babies Breathe into a Virtual Curriculum: Methods, Results, and Lessons Learned
title_short Adapting Helping Babies Breathe into a Virtual Curriculum: Methods, Results, and Lessons Learned
title_sort adapting helping babies breathe into a virtual curriculum methods results and lessons learned
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X211019698
work_keys_str_mv AT celiasobelmanmd adaptinghelpingbabiesbreatheintoavirtualcurriculummethodsresultsandlessonslearned
AT kristenrichardmd adaptinghelpingbabiesbreatheintoavirtualcurriculummethodsresultsandlessonslearned
AT patriciamcquilkinmd adaptinghelpingbabiesbreatheintoavirtualcurriculummethodsresultsandlessonslearned
AT nishafaheydo adaptinghelpingbabiesbreatheintoavirtualcurriculummethodsresultsandlessonslearned