Material Deformation Behavior in T-Shape Hydroforming of Metal Microtubes

In this study, the material behavior in the T-shape microtube hydroforming (MTHF) of pure copper and stainless-steel SUS304 microtubes with an outer diameter of 500 µm and wall thickness of 100 µm was examined experimentally and numerically. This paper elucidates the basic deformat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hajime Yasui, Shoichiro Yoshihara, Shigeki Mori, Kazuo Tada, Ken-ichi Manabe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Metals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/10/2/199
_version_ 1811294396998483968
author Hajime Yasui
Shoichiro Yoshihara
Shigeki Mori
Kazuo Tada
Ken-ichi Manabe
author_facet Hajime Yasui
Shoichiro Yoshihara
Shigeki Mori
Kazuo Tada
Ken-ichi Manabe
author_sort Hajime Yasui
collection DOAJ
description In this study, the material behavior in the T-shape microtube hydroforming (MTHF) of pure copper and stainless-steel SUS304 microtubes with an outer diameter of 500 µm and wall thickness of 100 µm was examined experimentally and numerically. This paper elucidates the basic deformation characteristics, the forming defects, and the forming limit as well as the effects of lubrication/friction and tube length. The hydroformability (bulge height) of the SUS304 microtube was shown to be higher than that of the copper microtube because of the high buckling resistance of SUS304. Good lubrication experimentally led to the high hydroformability of T-shape forming. The length of the microtube significantly affects its hydroformability. Friction resistance increases with increasing tube length and restricts the flow of the microtube material into the die cavity. By comparing the T-shape and cross-shape MHTF characteristics, we verified the hydroformability of the T-shape microtube to be superior to that of the cross-shape microtube theoretically and experimentally. In addition, the process window for T-shape MTHF had a narrower “success” area and wider buckling and folding regions than that for cross-shape MTHF. Furthermore, conventional finite element (FE) modeling without consideration of the grains was valid for MTHF processes owing to the many grains in the thickness direction.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:16:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ce2bad2c00b44267bbfa7ca6f8732701
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4701
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:16:58Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Metals
spelling doaj.art-ce2bad2c00b44267bbfa7ca6f87327012022-12-22T03:00:52ZengMDPI AGMetals2075-47012020-01-0110219910.3390/met10020199met10020199Material Deformation Behavior in T-Shape Hydroforming of Metal MicrotubesHajime Yasui0Shoichiro Yoshihara1Shigeki Mori2Kazuo Tada3Ken-ichi Manabe4Faculty of Engineering, Integrated Graduate School of Medical, Engineering, and Agricultural Sciences, University of Yamanashi, 4-3-11 Takeda Kofu-shi, Yamanashi 400-8511, JapanDepartment of Engineering and Design, Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-9-14 Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8548, JapanMetal forming unit, Polytechnic University, 2-32-1 Ogawanishi-Machi, Kodaira-shi, Tokyo 187-0035, JapanDepartment of Mechanical System Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 192-0397, JapanDepartment of Mechanical System Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 192-0397, JapanIn this study, the material behavior in the T-shape microtube hydroforming (MTHF) of pure copper and stainless-steel SUS304 microtubes with an outer diameter of 500 µm and wall thickness of 100 µm was examined experimentally and numerically. This paper elucidates the basic deformation characteristics, the forming defects, and the forming limit as well as the effects of lubrication/friction and tube length. The hydroformability (bulge height) of the SUS304 microtube was shown to be higher than that of the copper microtube because of the high buckling resistance of SUS304. Good lubrication experimentally led to the high hydroformability of T-shape forming. The length of the microtube significantly affects its hydroformability. Friction resistance increases with increasing tube length and restricts the flow of the microtube material into the die cavity. By comparing the T-shape and cross-shape MHTF characteristics, we verified the hydroformability of the T-shape microtube to be superior to that of the cross-shape microtube theoretically and experimentally. In addition, the process window for T-shape MTHF had a narrower “success” area and wider buckling and folding regions than that for cross-shape MTHF. Furthermore, conventional finite element (FE) modeling without consideration of the grains was valid for MTHF processes owing to the many grains in the thickness direction.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/10/2/199microtubehydroformingt-shape bulgingtube materialsfrictiontube lengthmicro hydroformabilityprocess windowfe analysismicrostructure
spellingShingle Hajime Yasui
Shoichiro Yoshihara
Shigeki Mori
Kazuo Tada
Ken-ichi Manabe
Material Deformation Behavior in T-Shape Hydroforming of Metal Microtubes
Metals
microtube
hydroforming
t-shape bulging
tube materials
friction
tube length
micro hydroformability
process window
fe analysis
microstructure
title Material Deformation Behavior in T-Shape Hydroforming of Metal Microtubes
title_full Material Deformation Behavior in T-Shape Hydroforming of Metal Microtubes
title_fullStr Material Deformation Behavior in T-Shape Hydroforming of Metal Microtubes
title_full_unstemmed Material Deformation Behavior in T-Shape Hydroforming of Metal Microtubes
title_short Material Deformation Behavior in T-Shape Hydroforming of Metal Microtubes
title_sort material deformation behavior in t shape hydroforming of metal microtubes
topic microtube
hydroforming
t-shape bulging
tube materials
friction
tube length
micro hydroformability
process window
fe analysis
microstructure
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/10/2/199
work_keys_str_mv AT hajimeyasui materialdeformationbehaviorintshapehydroformingofmetalmicrotubes
AT shoichiroyoshihara materialdeformationbehaviorintshapehydroformingofmetalmicrotubes
AT shigekimori materialdeformationbehaviorintshapehydroformingofmetalmicrotubes
AT kazuotada materialdeformationbehaviorintshapehydroformingofmetalmicrotubes
AT kenichimanabe materialdeformationbehaviorintshapehydroformingofmetalmicrotubes