The limits of watershed delineation: implications of different DEMs, DEM resolutions, and area threshold values

Identifying and demarcating watershed areas provides a basis for designing and planning for water resources. In this study, DEMs-based estimates of watershed characteristics of three rivers of Bangladesh – Halda, Sangu, and Chengi – were derived using eight Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) of 30 m, 9...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Srijon Datta, Shyamal Karmakar, Symon Mezbahuddin, Mohammad Mozaffar Hossain, B. S. Chaudhary, Md. Enamul Hoque, M. M. Abdullah Al Mamun, Tarit Kumar Baul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IWA Publishing 2022-08-01
Series:Hydrology Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hr.iwaponline.com/content/53/8/1047
_version_ 1811209439056756736
author Srijon Datta
Shyamal Karmakar
Symon Mezbahuddin
Mohammad Mozaffar Hossain
B. S. Chaudhary
Md. Enamul Hoque
M. M. Abdullah Al Mamun
Tarit Kumar Baul
author_facet Srijon Datta
Shyamal Karmakar
Symon Mezbahuddin
Mohammad Mozaffar Hossain
B. S. Chaudhary
Md. Enamul Hoque
M. M. Abdullah Al Mamun
Tarit Kumar Baul
author_sort Srijon Datta
collection DOAJ
description Identifying and demarcating watershed areas provides a basis for designing and planning for water resources. In this study, DEMs-based estimates of watershed characteristics of three rivers of Bangladesh – Halda, Sangu, and Chengi – were derived using eight Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) of 30 m, 90 m, and 225 m resolution in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). We have assessed watershed characteristics concerning DEMs, resolutions, and Area Threshold Values (ATVs). Though the elevation data differed, high correlation values among DEMs and resolutions confirm the negligible effect of elevation in the watershed delineation. However, the slope and watershed delineation vary for different DEMs and resolutions. The 90 m DEMs estimated larger areas for Halda and Chengi and lower perimeter values for all three rivers. In watershed delineation, the area near the mouth and flat terrain did not coincide with DEMs. The common intersected area by DEMs can be used as the focal area of watershed management. ATV ≤ 40 km2 significantly influences sub-basin counts and stream network extraction for these watershed areas. Though watershed size and shape were independent of the different ATVs, the DEM-based watershed delineation process in SWAT needs optimum ATV values to represent the stream network precisely. HIGHLIGHTS DEM source influences the slope, and DEM resolution affects the basin perimeter of a watershed.; The flat terrain area influences watershed delineation.; The sub-basin counts and stream network extraction should consider an optimum ATV value (here, ≤40 km2).; The watershed size and shape were independent of the ATVs.; The common intersected area, independent of the DEMs and resolutions, can be used as the watershed management area.;
first_indexed 2024-04-12T04:39:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ce2cdbae5a934cc78ddd2bc9b6f59d84
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1998-9563
2224-7955
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T04:39:25Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher IWA Publishing
record_format Article
series Hydrology Research
spelling doaj.art-ce2cdbae5a934cc78ddd2bc9b6f59d842022-12-22T03:47:43ZengIWA PublishingHydrology Research1998-95632224-79552022-08-015381047106210.2166/nh.2022.126126The limits of watershed delineation: implications of different DEMs, DEM resolutions, and area threshold valuesSrijon Datta0Shyamal Karmakar1Symon Mezbahuddin2Mohammad Mozaffar Hossain3B. S. Chaudhary4Md. Enamul Hoque5M. M. Abdullah Al Mamun6Tarit Kumar Baul7 Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chattogram - 4331, Bangladesh Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chattogram - 4331, Bangladesh Natural Resource Management Branch, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, AB, Edmonton, Canada Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chattogram - 4331, Bangladesh Department of Geophysics, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana 136119, India Department of Oceanography, University of Chittagong, Chattogram - 4331, Bangladesh Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chattogram - 4331, Bangladesh Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chattogram - 4331, Bangladesh Identifying and demarcating watershed areas provides a basis for designing and planning for water resources. In this study, DEMs-based estimates of watershed characteristics of three rivers of Bangladesh – Halda, Sangu, and Chengi – were derived using eight Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) of 30 m, 90 m, and 225 m resolution in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). We have assessed watershed characteristics concerning DEMs, resolutions, and Area Threshold Values (ATVs). Though the elevation data differed, high correlation values among DEMs and resolutions confirm the negligible effect of elevation in the watershed delineation. However, the slope and watershed delineation vary for different DEMs and resolutions. The 90 m DEMs estimated larger areas for Halda and Chengi and lower perimeter values for all three rivers. In watershed delineation, the area near the mouth and flat terrain did not coincide with DEMs. The common intersected area by DEMs can be used as the focal area of watershed management. ATV ≤ 40 km2 significantly influences sub-basin counts and stream network extraction for these watershed areas. Though watershed size and shape were independent of the different ATVs, the DEM-based watershed delineation process in SWAT needs optimum ATV values to represent the stream network precisely. HIGHLIGHTS DEM source influences the slope, and DEM resolution affects the basin perimeter of a watershed.; The flat terrain area influences watershed delineation.; The sub-basin counts and stream network extraction should consider an optimum ATV value (here, ≤40 km2).; The watershed size and shape were independent of the ATVs.; The common intersected area, independent of the DEMs and resolutions, can be used as the watershed management area.;http://hr.iwaponline.com/content/53/8/1047catchmentdem resolutionhydrological modelnetworkstreamswat
spellingShingle Srijon Datta
Shyamal Karmakar
Symon Mezbahuddin
Mohammad Mozaffar Hossain
B. S. Chaudhary
Md. Enamul Hoque
M. M. Abdullah Al Mamun
Tarit Kumar Baul
The limits of watershed delineation: implications of different DEMs, DEM resolutions, and area threshold values
Hydrology Research
catchment
dem resolution
hydrological model
network
stream
swat
title The limits of watershed delineation: implications of different DEMs, DEM resolutions, and area threshold values
title_full The limits of watershed delineation: implications of different DEMs, DEM resolutions, and area threshold values
title_fullStr The limits of watershed delineation: implications of different DEMs, DEM resolutions, and area threshold values
title_full_unstemmed The limits of watershed delineation: implications of different DEMs, DEM resolutions, and area threshold values
title_short The limits of watershed delineation: implications of different DEMs, DEM resolutions, and area threshold values
title_sort limits of watershed delineation implications of different dems dem resolutions and area threshold values
topic catchment
dem resolution
hydrological model
network
stream
swat
url http://hr.iwaponline.com/content/53/8/1047
work_keys_str_mv AT srijondatta thelimitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT shyamalkarmakar thelimitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT symonmezbahuddin thelimitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT mohammadmozaffarhossain thelimitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT bschaudhary thelimitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT mdenamulhoque thelimitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT mmabdullahalmamun thelimitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT taritkumarbaul thelimitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT srijondatta limitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT shyamalkarmakar limitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT symonmezbahuddin limitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT mohammadmozaffarhossain limitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT bschaudhary limitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT mdenamulhoque limitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT mmabdullahalmamun limitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues
AT taritkumarbaul limitsofwatersheddelineationimplicationsofdifferentdemsdemresolutionsandareathresholdvalues