Forests as landscapes of social inequality: tropical forest cover and land distribution among shifting cultivators

Can social inequality be seen imprinted in a forest landscape? We studied the relationship between land holding, land use, and inequality in a peasant community in the Peruvian Amazon where farmers practice swidden-fallow cultivation. Longitudinal data on land holding, land use, and land cover were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oliver T. Coomes, Yoshito Takasaki, Jeanine M. Rhemtulla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2016-09-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss3/art20/
_version_ 1818825080770134016
author Oliver T. Coomes
Yoshito Takasaki
Jeanine M. Rhemtulla
author_facet Oliver T. Coomes
Yoshito Takasaki
Jeanine M. Rhemtulla
author_sort Oliver T. Coomes
collection DOAJ
description Can social inequality be seen imprinted in a forest landscape? We studied the relationship between land holding, land use, and inequality in a peasant community in the Peruvian Amazon where farmers practice swidden-fallow cultivation. Longitudinal data on land holding, land use, and land cover were gathered through field-level surveys (n = 316) and household interviews (n = 51) in 1994/1995 and 2007. Forest cover change between 1965 and 2007 was documented through interpretation of air photos and satellite imagery. We introduce the concept of "land use inequality" to capture differences across households in the distribution of forest fallowing and orchard raising as key land uses that affect household welfare and the sustainability of swidden-fallow agriculture. We find that land holding, land use, and forest cover distribution are correlated and that the forest today reflects social inequality a decade prior. Although initially land-poor households may catch up in terms of land holdings, their use and land cover remain impoverished. Differential land use investment through time links social inequality and forest cover. Implications are discussed for the study of forests as landscapes of inequality, the relationship between social inequality and forest composition, and the forest-poverty nexus.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T00:06:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ce388f724e3e44059636efc90cb25206
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1708-3087
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T00:06:05Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Resilience Alliance
record_format Article
series Ecology and Society
spelling doaj.art-ce388f724e3e44059636efc90cb252062022-12-21T20:46:14ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872016-09-012132010.5751/ES-08684-2103208684Forests as landscapes of social inequality: tropical forest cover and land distribution among shifting cultivatorsOliver T. Coomes0Yoshito Takasaki1Jeanine M. Rhemtulla2Department of Geography, McGill UniversityGraduate School of Economics, University of TokyoDepartment of Forest & Conservation Sciences, University of British ColumbiaCan social inequality be seen imprinted in a forest landscape? We studied the relationship between land holding, land use, and inequality in a peasant community in the Peruvian Amazon where farmers practice swidden-fallow cultivation. Longitudinal data on land holding, land use, and land cover were gathered through field-level surveys (n = 316) and household interviews (n = 51) in 1994/1995 and 2007. Forest cover change between 1965 and 2007 was documented through interpretation of air photos and satellite imagery. We introduce the concept of "land use inequality" to capture differences across households in the distribution of forest fallowing and orchard raising as key land uses that affect household welfare and the sustainability of swidden-fallow agriculture. We find that land holding, land use, and forest cover distribution are correlated and that the forest today reflects social inequality a decade prior. Although initially land-poor households may catch up in terms of land holdings, their use and land cover remain impoverished. Differential land use investment through time links social inequality and forest cover. Implications are discussed for the study of forests as landscapes of inequality, the relationship between social inequality and forest composition, and the forest-poverty nexus.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss3/art20/Amazonialand inequalityland use and land cover changepath dependencysecondary forests
spellingShingle Oliver T. Coomes
Yoshito Takasaki
Jeanine M. Rhemtulla
Forests as landscapes of social inequality: tropical forest cover and land distribution among shifting cultivators
Ecology and Society
Amazonia
land inequality
land use and land cover change
path dependency
secondary forests
title Forests as landscapes of social inequality: tropical forest cover and land distribution among shifting cultivators
title_full Forests as landscapes of social inequality: tropical forest cover and land distribution among shifting cultivators
title_fullStr Forests as landscapes of social inequality: tropical forest cover and land distribution among shifting cultivators
title_full_unstemmed Forests as landscapes of social inequality: tropical forest cover and land distribution among shifting cultivators
title_short Forests as landscapes of social inequality: tropical forest cover and land distribution among shifting cultivators
title_sort forests as landscapes of social inequality tropical forest cover and land distribution among shifting cultivators
topic Amazonia
land inequality
land use and land cover change
path dependency
secondary forests
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss3/art20/
work_keys_str_mv AT olivertcoomes forestsaslandscapesofsocialinequalitytropicalforestcoverandlanddistributionamongshiftingcultivators
AT yoshitotakasaki forestsaslandscapesofsocialinequalitytropicalforestcoverandlanddistributionamongshiftingcultivators
AT jeaninemrhemtulla forestsaslandscapesofsocialinequalitytropicalforestcoverandlanddistributionamongshiftingcultivators