Zooplankton-phytoplankton biomass and diversity relationships in the Great Lakes.

Quantifying the relationship between phytoplankton and zooplankton may offer insight into zooplankton sensitivity to shifting phytoplankton assemblages and the potential impacts of producer-consumer decoupling on the rest of the food web. We analyzed 18 years (2001-2018) of paired phytoplankton and...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: Katya E Kovalenko, Euan D Reavie, Stephanie Figary, Lars G Rudstam, James M Watkins, Anne Scofield, Christopher T Filstrup
Μορφή: Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:English
Έκδοση: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Σειρά:PLoS ONE
Διαθέσιμο Online:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292988
_version_ 1827773864329871360
author Katya E Kovalenko
Euan D Reavie
Stephanie Figary
Lars G Rudstam
James M Watkins
Anne Scofield
Christopher T Filstrup
author_facet Katya E Kovalenko
Euan D Reavie
Stephanie Figary
Lars G Rudstam
James M Watkins
Anne Scofield
Christopher T Filstrup
author_sort Katya E Kovalenko
collection DOAJ
description Quantifying the relationship between phytoplankton and zooplankton may offer insight into zooplankton sensitivity to shifting phytoplankton assemblages and the potential impacts of producer-consumer decoupling on the rest of the food web. We analyzed 18 years (2001-2018) of paired phytoplankton and zooplankton samples collected as part of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Great Lakes Biology Monitoring Program to examine both the long-term and seasonal relationships between zooplankton and phytoplankton across all five Laurentian Great Lakes. We also analyzed effects of phytoplankton diversity on zooplankton biomass, diversity, and predator-prey (zooplanktivore/grazer) ratios. Across the Great Lakes, there was a weak positive correlation between total algal biovolume and zooplankton biomass in both spring and summer. The relationship was weaker and not consistently positive within individual lakes. These trends were consistent over time, providing no evidence of increasing decoupling over the study period. Zooplankton biomass was weakly negatively correlated with algal diversity across lakes, whereas zooplankton diversity was unaffected. These relationships did not change when we considered only the edible phytoplankton fraction, possibly due to the high correlation between total and edible phytoplankton biovolume in most of these lakes. Lack of strong coupling between these producer and consumer assemblages may be related to lagging responses by the consumers, top-down effects from higher-level consumers, or other confounding factors. These results underscore the difficulty in predicting higher trophic level responses, including zooplankton, from changes in phytoplankton assemblages.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T13:28:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ce3de4055cfd4d90a53e8d9a02919aa2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T13:28:54Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-ce3de4055cfd4d90a53e8d9a02919aa22023-11-03T05:32:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-011810e029298810.1371/journal.pone.0292988Zooplankton-phytoplankton biomass and diversity relationships in the Great Lakes.Katya E KovalenkoEuan D ReavieStephanie FigaryLars G RudstamJames M WatkinsAnne ScofieldChristopher T FilstrupQuantifying the relationship between phytoplankton and zooplankton may offer insight into zooplankton sensitivity to shifting phytoplankton assemblages and the potential impacts of producer-consumer decoupling on the rest of the food web. We analyzed 18 years (2001-2018) of paired phytoplankton and zooplankton samples collected as part of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Great Lakes Biology Monitoring Program to examine both the long-term and seasonal relationships between zooplankton and phytoplankton across all five Laurentian Great Lakes. We also analyzed effects of phytoplankton diversity on zooplankton biomass, diversity, and predator-prey (zooplanktivore/grazer) ratios. Across the Great Lakes, there was a weak positive correlation between total algal biovolume and zooplankton biomass in both spring and summer. The relationship was weaker and not consistently positive within individual lakes. These trends were consistent over time, providing no evidence of increasing decoupling over the study period. Zooplankton biomass was weakly negatively correlated with algal diversity across lakes, whereas zooplankton diversity was unaffected. These relationships did not change when we considered only the edible phytoplankton fraction, possibly due to the high correlation between total and edible phytoplankton biovolume in most of these lakes. Lack of strong coupling between these producer and consumer assemblages may be related to lagging responses by the consumers, top-down effects from higher-level consumers, or other confounding factors. These results underscore the difficulty in predicting higher trophic level responses, including zooplankton, from changes in phytoplankton assemblages.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292988
spellingShingle Katya E Kovalenko
Euan D Reavie
Stephanie Figary
Lars G Rudstam
James M Watkins
Anne Scofield
Christopher T Filstrup
Zooplankton-phytoplankton biomass and diversity relationships in the Great Lakes.
PLoS ONE
title Zooplankton-phytoplankton biomass and diversity relationships in the Great Lakes.
title_full Zooplankton-phytoplankton biomass and diversity relationships in the Great Lakes.
title_fullStr Zooplankton-phytoplankton biomass and diversity relationships in the Great Lakes.
title_full_unstemmed Zooplankton-phytoplankton biomass and diversity relationships in the Great Lakes.
title_short Zooplankton-phytoplankton biomass and diversity relationships in the Great Lakes.
title_sort zooplankton phytoplankton biomass and diversity relationships in the great lakes
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292988
work_keys_str_mv AT katyaekovalenko zooplanktonphytoplanktonbiomassanddiversityrelationshipsinthegreatlakes
AT euandreavie zooplanktonphytoplanktonbiomassanddiversityrelationshipsinthegreatlakes
AT stephaniefigary zooplanktonphytoplanktonbiomassanddiversityrelationshipsinthegreatlakes
AT larsgrudstam zooplanktonphytoplanktonbiomassanddiversityrelationshipsinthegreatlakes
AT jamesmwatkins zooplanktonphytoplanktonbiomassanddiversityrelationshipsinthegreatlakes
AT annescofield zooplanktonphytoplanktonbiomassanddiversityrelationshipsinthegreatlakes
AT christophertfilstrup zooplanktonphytoplanktonbiomassanddiversityrelationshipsinthegreatlakes