Are We Focused on the Wrong Early Postoperative Quality Metrics? Optimal Realignment Outweighs Perioperative Risk in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Background: While reimbursement is centered on 90-day outcomes, many patients may still achieve optimal, long-term outcomes following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery despite transient short-term complications. Objective: Compare long-term clinical success and cost-utility between patients achie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter G. Passias, Tyler K. Williamson, Jamshaid M. Mir, Justin S. Smith, Virginie Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Breton Line, Alan H. Daniels, Jeffrey L. Gum, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, David Kojo Hamilton, Alex Soroceanu, Justin K. Scheer, Robert Eastlack, Gregory M. Mundis, Bassel Diebo, Khaled M. Kebaish, Richard A. Hostin, Munish C. Gupta, Han Jo Kim, Eric O. Klineberg, Christopher P. Ames, Robert A. Hart, Douglas C. Burton, Frank J. Schwab, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Shay Bess, on behalf of the International Spine Study Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/17/5565
_version_ 1797582352280453120
author Peter G. Passias
Tyler K. Williamson
Jamshaid M. Mir
Justin S. Smith
Virginie Lafage
Renaud Lafage
Breton Line
Alan H. Daniels
Jeffrey L. Gum
Andrew J. Schoenfeld
David Kojo Hamilton
Alex Soroceanu
Justin K. Scheer
Robert Eastlack
Gregory M. Mundis
Bassel Diebo
Khaled M. Kebaish
Richard A. Hostin
Munish C. Gupta
Han Jo Kim
Eric O. Klineberg
Christopher P. Ames
Robert A. Hart
Douglas C. Burton
Frank J. Schwab
Christopher I. Shaffrey
Shay Bess
on behalf of the International Spine Study Group
author_facet Peter G. Passias
Tyler K. Williamson
Jamshaid M. Mir
Justin S. Smith
Virginie Lafage
Renaud Lafage
Breton Line
Alan H. Daniels
Jeffrey L. Gum
Andrew J. Schoenfeld
David Kojo Hamilton
Alex Soroceanu
Justin K. Scheer
Robert Eastlack
Gregory M. Mundis
Bassel Diebo
Khaled M. Kebaish
Richard A. Hostin
Munish C. Gupta
Han Jo Kim
Eric O. Klineberg
Christopher P. Ames
Robert A. Hart
Douglas C. Burton
Frank J. Schwab
Christopher I. Shaffrey
Shay Bess
on behalf of the International Spine Study Group
author_sort Peter G. Passias
collection DOAJ
description Background: While reimbursement is centered on 90-day outcomes, many patients may still achieve optimal, long-term outcomes following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery despite transient short-term complications. Objective: Compare long-term clinical success and cost-utility between patients achieving optimal realignment and suboptimally aligned peers. Study Design/Setting: Retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected multicenter database. Methods: ASD patients with two-year (2Y) data included. Groups were propensity score matched (PSM) for age, frailty, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and baseline deformity. Optimal radiographic criteria are defined as meeting low deformity in all three (Scoliosis Research Society) SRS-Schwab parameters or being proportioned in Global Alignment and Proportionality (GAP). Cost-per-QALY was calculated for each time point. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) adjusting for baseline disability and deformity (pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL)) were used to determine the significance of surgical details, complications, clinical outcomes, and cost-utility. Results: A total of 930 patients were considered. Following PSM, 253 “optimal” (O) and 253 “not optimal” (NO) patients were assessed. The O group underwent more invasive procedures and had more levels fused. Analysis of complications by two years showed that the O group suffered less overall major (38% vs. 52%, <i>p</i> = 0.021) and major mechanical complications (12% vs. 22%, <i>p</i> = 0.002), and less reoperations (23% vs. 33%, <i>p</i> = 0.008). Adjusted analysis revealed O patients more often met MCID (minimal clinically important difference) in SF-36 PCS, SRS-22 Pain, and Appearance. Cost-utility-adjusted analysis determined that the O group generated better cost-utility by one year and maintained lower overall cost and costs per QALY (both <i>p</i> < 0.001) at two years. Conclusions: Fewer late complications (mechanical and reoperations) are seen in optimally aligned patients, leading to better long-term cost-utility overall. Therefore, the current focus on avoiding short-term complications may be counterproductive, as achieving optimal surgical correction is critical for long-term success.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T23:19:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ce508e3358b5473b93033b07d2ce202c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T23:19:52Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-ce508e3358b5473b93033b07d2ce202c2023-11-19T08:22:24ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-08-011217556510.3390/jcm12175565Are We Focused on the Wrong Early Postoperative Quality Metrics? Optimal Realignment Outweighs Perioperative Risk in Adult Spinal Deformity SurgeryPeter G. Passias0Tyler K. Williamson1Jamshaid M. Mir2Justin S. Smith3Virginie Lafage4Renaud Lafage5Breton Line6Alan H. Daniels7Jeffrey L. Gum8Andrew J. Schoenfeld9David Kojo Hamilton10Alex Soroceanu11Justin K. Scheer12Robert Eastlack13Gregory M. Mundis14Bassel Diebo15Khaled M. Kebaish16Richard A. Hostin17Munish C. Gupta18Han Jo Kim19Eric O. Klineberg20Christopher P. Ames21Robert A. Hart22Douglas C. Burton23Frank J. Schwab24Christopher I. Shaffrey25Shay Bess26on behalf of the International Spine Study Group27Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY 10003, USADepartments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY 10003, USADepartments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY 10003, USADepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USADepartment of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY 10075, USADepartment of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USADepartment of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke’s/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO 80205, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY 40202, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA 02120, USADepartments of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USADivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA 92037, USADivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA 92037, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21205, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Dallas, TX 75243, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USADepartment of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95819, USADepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA 98122, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USADepartment of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY 10075, USASpine Division, Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USADepartment of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke’s/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO 80205, USARocky Mountain Scoliosis and Spine, Denver, CO 80124, USABackground: While reimbursement is centered on 90-day outcomes, many patients may still achieve optimal, long-term outcomes following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery despite transient short-term complications. Objective: Compare long-term clinical success and cost-utility between patients achieving optimal realignment and suboptimally aligned peers. Study Design/Setting: Retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected multicenter database. Methods: ASD patients with two-year (2Y) data included. Groups were propensity score matched (PSM) for age, frailty, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and baseline deformity. Optimal radiographic criteria are defined as meeting low deformity in all three (Scoliosis Research Society) SRS-Schwab parameters or being proportioned in Global Alignment and Proportionality (GAP). Cost-per-QALY was calculated for each time point. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) adjusting for baseline disability and deformity (pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL)) were used to determine the significance of surgical details, complications, clinical outcomes, and cost-utility. Results: A total of 930 patients were considered. Following PSM, 253 “optimal” (O) and 253 “not optimal” (NO) patients were assessed. The O group underwent more invasive procedures and had more levels fused. Analysis of complications by two years showed that the O group suffered less overall major (38% vs. 52%, <i>p</i> = 0.021) and major mechanical complications (12% vs. 22%, <i>p</i> = 0.002), and less reoperations (23% vs. 33%, <i>p</i> = 0.008). Adjusted analysis revealed O patients more often met MCID (minimal clinically important difference) in SF-36 PCS, SRS-22 Pain, and Appearance. Cost-utility-adjusted analysis determined that the O group generated better cost-utility by one year and maintained lower overall cost and costs per QALY (both <i>p</i> < 0.001) at two years. Conclusions: Fewer late complications (mechanical and reoperations) are seen in optimally aligned patients, leading to better long-term cost-utility overall. Therefore, the current focus on avoiding short-term complications may be counterproductive, as achieving optimal surgical correction is critical for long-term success.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/17/5565adult spinal deformitycost-utilitycomplicationscomplex realignmentMedicareclinical improvement
spellingShingle Peter G. Passias
Tyler K. Williamson
Jamshaid M. Mir
Justin S. Smith
Virginie Lafage
Renaud Lafage
Breton Line
Alan H. Daniels
Jeffrey L. Gum
Andrew J. Schoenfeld
David Kojo Hamilton
Alex Soroceanu
Justin K. Scheer
Robert Eastlack
Gregory M. Mundis
Bassel Diebo
Khaled M. Kebaish
Richard A. Hostin
Munish C. Gupta
Han Jo Kim
Eric O. Klineberg
Christopher P. Ames
Robert A. Hart
Douglas C. Burton
Frank J. Schwab
Christopher I. Shaffrey
Shay Bess
on behalf of the International Spine Study Group
Are We Focused on the Wrong Early Postoperative Quality Metrics? Optimal Realignment Outweighs Perioperative Risk in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
Journal of Clinical Medicine
adult spinal deformity
cost-utility
complications
complex realignment
Medicare
clinical improvement
title Are We Focused on the Wrong Early Postoperative Quality Metrics? Optimal Realignment Outweighs Perioperative Risk in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
title_full Are We Focused on the Wrong Early Postoperative Quality Metrics? Optimal Realignment Outweighs Perioperative Risk in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
title_fullStr Are We Focused on the Wrong Early Postoperative Quality Metrics? Optimal Realignment Outweighs Perioperative Risk in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Are We Focused on the Wrong Early Postoperative Quality Metrics? Optimal Realignment Outweighs Perioperative Risk in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
title_short Are We Focused on the Wrong Early Postoperative Quality Metrics? Optimal Realignment Outweighs Perioperative Risk in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
title_sort are we focused on the wrong early postoperative quality metrics optimal realignment outweighs perioperative risk in adult spinal deformity surgery
topic adult spinal deformity
cost-utility
complications
complex realignment
Medicare
clinical improvement
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/17/5565
work_keys_str_mv AT petergpassias arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT tylerkwilliamson arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT jamshaidmmir arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT justinssmith arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT virginielafage arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT renaudlafage arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT bretonline arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT alanhdaniels arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT jeffreylgum arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT andrewjschoenfeld arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT davidkojohamilton arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT alexsoroceanu arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT justinkscheer arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT roberteastlack arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT gregorymmundis arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT basseldiebo arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT khaledmkebaish arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT richardahostin arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT munishcgupta arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT hanjokim arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT ericoklineberg arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT christopherpames arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT robertahart arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT douglascburton arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT frankjschwab arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT christopherishaffrey arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT shaybess arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery
AT onbehalfoftheinternationalspinestudygroup arewefocusedonthewrongearlypostoperativequalitymetricsoptimalrealignmentoutweighsperioperativeriskinadultspinaldeformitysurgery