The effect of differences in group composition on knowledge transfer, group achievement, and learners’ affective responses during reciprocal concept mapping with the Kit-Build Approach

Abstract Collaborative learning requires a structured and open environment where individuals can actively exchange and elaborate their ideas to achieve a high-quality problem-solving solution. The use of concept map has been extensively implemented to facilitate idea generation and maintain shared f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lia Sadita, Tsukasa Hirashima, Yusuke Hayashi, Pedro G. F. Furtado, Kasiyah Junus, Harry Budi Santoso
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE) 2020-06-01
Series:Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41039-020-00133-9
_version_ 1797722797010583552
author Lia Sadita
Tsukasa Hirashima
Yusuke Hayashi
Pedro G. F. Furtado
Kasiyah Junus
Harry Budi Santoso
author_facet Lia Sadita
Tsukasa Hirashima
Yusuke Hayashi
Pedro G. F. Furtado
Kasiyah Junus
Harry Budi Santoso
author_sort Lia Sadita
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Collaborative learning requires a structured and open environment where individuals can actively exchange and elaborate their ideas to achieve a high-quality problem-solving solution. The use of concept map has been extensively implemented to facilitate idea generation and maintain shared focus during discussion. This study employs the Reciprocal Kit-Build (RKB) approach as a designed activity to support collaborative concept mapping. Though previous studies show the RKB is promising to promote productive discussion and achieve high-quality group products, they have not investigated how individual knowledge differences may potentially influence the effectiveness of collaboration. This study aims to identify the effect of group composition on learning effectiveness at the level of interaction between individual and group and at the level of the group as a whole. At the interaction level, we investigate the amount of knowledge transfer from shared and unshared individual knowledge to group solutions, while at the group level, the quality of collaborative maps is evaluated. Moreover, we explore the affective responses of learners during designated activities. A single group design is applied to illustrate the learning activities in a practical classroom settings where all students receive the same treatment. Our findings show that the transfer of individual shared and unshared knowledge is considerably high in all group conditions. Group composition does not significantly affect knowledge transfer and final group-outcome products; however, it may induce learners to experience different affective states. The results are essential for practitioners who intend to apply the RKB in their classroom to determine the appropriate group settings.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:53:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ce585df638fa4c4cb5d30b94f94ac1e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1793-7078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:53:45Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher The Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE)
record_format Article
series Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
spelling doaj.art-ce585df638fa4c4cb5d30b94f94ac1e52023-09-02T12:22:44ZengThe Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE)Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning1793-70782020-06-0115111910.1186/s41039-020-00133-9The effect of differences in group composition on knowledge transfer, group achievement, and learners’ affective responses during reciprocal concept mapping with the Kit-Build ApproachLia Sadita0Tsukasa Hirashima1Yusuke Hayashi2Pedro G. F. Furtado3Kasiyah Junus4Harry Budi Santoso5Learning Engineering Laboratory, Department of Information Engineering, Hiroshima UniversityLearning Engineering Laboratory, Department of Information Engineering, Hiroshima UniversityLearning Engineering Laboratory, Department of Information Engineering, Hiroshima UniversityLearning Engineering Laboratory, Department of Information Engineering, Hiroshima UniversityDigital Library and Distance Learning Laboratory, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas IndonesiaDigital Library and Distance Learning Laboratory, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas IndonesiaAbstract Collaborative learning requires a structured and open environment where individuals can actively exchange and elaborate their ideas to achieve a high-quality problem-solving solution. The use of concept map has been extensively implemented to facilitate idea generation and maintain shared focus during discussion. This study employs the Reciprocal Kit-Build (RKB) approach as a designed activity to support collaborative concept mapping. Though previous studies show the RKB is promising to promote productive discussion and achieve high-quality group products, they have not investigated how individual knowledge differences may potentially influence the effectiveness of collaboration. This study aims to identify the effect of group composition on learning effectiveness at the level of interaction between individual and group and at the level of the group as a whole. At the interaction level, we investigate the amount of knowledge transfer from shared and unshared individual knowledge to group solutions, while at the group level, the quality of collaborative maps is evaluated. Moreover, we explore the affective responses of learners during designated activities. A single group design is applied to illustrate the learning activities in a practical classroom settings where all students receive the same treatment. Our findings show that the transfer of individual shared and unshared knowledge is considerably high in all group conditions. Group composition does not significantly affect knowledge transfer and final group-outcome products; however, it may induce learners to experience different affective states. The results are essential for practitioners who intend to apply the RKB in their classroom to determine the appropriate group settings.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41039-020-00133-9Collaborative concept mapConcept mapKit buildKnowledge convergence
spellingShingle Lia Sadita
Tsukasa Hirashima
Yusuke Hayashi
Pedro G. F. Furtado
Kasiyah Junus
Harry Budi Santoso
The effect of differences in group composition on knowledge transfer, group achievement, and learners’ affective responses during reciprocal concept mapping with the Kit-Build Approach
Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
Collaborative concept map
Concept map
Kit build
Knowledge convergence
title The effect of differences in group composition on knowledge transfer, group achievement, and learners’ affective responses during reciprocal concept mapping with the Kit-Build Approach
title_full The effect of differences in group composition on knowledge transfer, group achievement, and learners’ affective responses during reciprocal concept mapping with the Kit-Build Approach
title_fullStr The effect of differences in group composition on knowledge transfer, group achievement, and learners’ affective responses during reciprocal concept mapping with the Kit-Build Approach
title_full_unstemmed The effect of differences in group composition on knowledge transfer, group achievement, and learners’ affective responses during reciprocal concept mapping with the Kit-Build Approach
title_short The effect of differences in group composition on knowledge transfer, group achievement, and learners’ affective responses during reciprocal concept mapping with the Kit-Build Approach
title_sort effect of differences in group composition on knowledge transfer group achievement and learners affective responses during reciprocal concept mapping with the kit build approach
topic Collaborative concept map
Concept map
Kit build
Knowledge convergence
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41039-020-00133-9
work_keys_str_mv AT liasadita theeffectofdifferencesingroupcompositiononknowledgetransfergroupachievementandlearnersaffectiveresponsesduringreciprocalconceptmappingwiththekitbuildapproach
AT tsukasahirashima theeffectofdifferencesingroupcompositiononknowledgetransfergroupachievementandlearnersaffectiveresponsesduringreciprocalconceptmappingwiththekitbuildapproach
AT yusukehayashi theeffectofdifferencesingroupcompositiononknowledgetransfergroupachievementandlearnersaffectiveresponsesduringreciprocalconceptmappingwiththekitbuildapproach
AT pedrogffurtado theeffectofdifferencesingroupcompositiononknowledgetransfergroupachievementandlearnersaffectiveresponsesduringreciprocalconceptmappingwiththekitbuildapproach
AT kasiyahjunus theeffectofdifferencesingroupcompositiononknowledgetransfergroupachievementandlearnersaffectiveresponsesduringreciprocalconceptmappingwiththekitbuildapproach
AT harrybudisantoso theeffectofdifferencesingroupcompositiononknowledgetransfergroupachievementandlearnersaffectiveresponsesduringreciprocalconceptmappingwiththekitbuildapproach
AT liasadita effectofdifferencesingroupcompositiononknowledgetransfergroupachievementandlearnersaffectiveresponsesduringreciprocalconceptmappingwiththekitbuildapproach
AT tsukasahirashima effectofdifferencesingroupcompositiononknowledgetransfergroupachievementandlearnersaffectiveresponsesduringreciprocalconceptmappingwiththekitbuildapproach
AT yusukehayashi effectofdifferencesingroupcompositiononknowledgetransfergroupachievementandlearnersaffectiveresponsesduringreciprocalconceptmappingwiththekitbuildapproach
AT pedrogffurtado effectofdifferencesingroupcompositiononknowledgetransfergroupachievementandlearnersaffectiveresponsesduringreciprocalconceptmappingwiththekitbuildapproach
AT kasiyahjunus effectofdifferencesingroupcompositiononknowledgetransfergroupachievementandlearnersaffectiveresponsesduringreciprocalconceptmappingwiththekitbuildapproach
AT harrybudisantoso effectofdifferencesingroupcompositiononknowledgetransfergroupachievementandlearnersaffectiveresponsesduringreciprocalconceptmappingwiththekitbuildapproach