Nauka i wartościowania – uwagi o kondycji filozoficznej refleksji nad nauką
This text is an attempt at a more general look at twentieth‑century philosophical reflection on science conceived as persistent trials to eliminate the non‑eliminateable, i.e. valuations. In this article, I recall the most important concepts of knowledge developed in the twentieth‑century philosophy...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Pedagogical University of Krakow
2014-12-01
|
| Series: | Argument |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://argumentwp.vipserv.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/pdfv4n2/argument_v4_n2_TrelaG.pdf |
| Summary: | This text is an attempt at a more general look at twentieth‑century philosophical reflection on science conceived as persistent trials to eliminate the non‑eliminateable, i.e. valuations. In this article, I recall the most important concepts of knowledge developed in the twentieth‑century philosophy of science by exposing assumed axiology in, among other things: the Vienna Circle, Karl Raimund Popper’s falsificationism, the historical and social approach of Thomas S. Kuhn’s paradigm, and the concept of the ideals of knowledge by Stefan Amsterdamski. I argue that the axiology, and more broadly philosophy is an indelible component of each accepted concept of scientific knowledge. Each concept of knowledge assumes a form of its valuation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2083-6635 2084-1043 |