Rural-urban differences in the association between individual, facility, and clinical characteristics and travel time for cancer treatment

Abstract Background Greater travel time to cancer care has been identified as a potential barrier to care as well as associated with worse health outcomes. While rural cancer patients have been shown to travel farther for care, it is not known what patient, facility, and clinical characteristics may...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joel E. Segel, Eugene J. Lengerich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-02-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8282-z
_version_ 1818451538631196672
author Joel E. Segel
Eugene J. Lengerich
author_facet Joel E. Segel
Eugene J. Lengerich
author_sort Joel E. Segel
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Greater travel time to cancer care has been identified as a potential barrier to care as well as associated with worse health outcomes. While rural cancer patients have been shown to travel farther for care, it is not known what patient, facility, and clinical characteristics may differentially be associated with greater roundtrip travel times for cancer patients by rurality of residence. Identifying these factors will help providers understand which patients may be most in need of resources to assist with travel. Methods Using 2010–2014 Pennsylvania Cancer Registry data, we examined the association between patient, facility, and clinical characteristics with roundtrip patient travel time using multivariate linear regression models. We then estimated separate models by rural residence based on the Rural-Urban Continuum Code (RUCC) of a patient’s county of residence at diagnosis to understand how the association of each factor with travel time may vary for patients separated into metro residents (RUCC 1–3); and two categories of non-metro residents (RUCC 4–6) and (RUCC 7–9). Results In our sample (n = 197,498), we document large differences in mean roundtrip travel time—mean 41.5 min for RUCC 1–3 patients vs. 128.9 min for RUCC 7–9 patients. We show cervical/uterine and ovarian cancer patients travel significantly farther; as do patients traveling to higher volume and higher-ranked hospitals. Conclusions To better understand patient travel burden, providers need to understand that factors predicting longer travel time may vary by rurality of patient residence and cancer type.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T21:08:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ce8b1b8c748b4b1a85ccacf954716046
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T21:08:48Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-ce8b1b8c748b4b1a85ccacf9547160462022-12-21T22:47:19ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582020-02-0120111010.1186/s12889-020-8282-zRural-urban differences in the association between individual, facility, and clinical characteristics and travel time for cancer treatmentJoel E. Segel0Eugene J. Lengerich1Department of Health Policy and Administration, Pennsylvania State UniversityPenn State Cancer InstituteAbstract Background Greater travel time to cancer care has been identified as a potential barrier to care as well as associated with worse health outcomes. While rural cancer patients have been shown to travel farther for care, it is not known what patient, facility, and clinical characteristics may differentially be associated with greater roundtrip travel times for cancer patients by rurality of residence. Identifying these factors will help providers understand which patients may be most in need of resources to assist with travel. Methods Using 2010–2014 Pennsylvania Cancer Registry data, we examined the association between patient, facility, and clinical characteristics with roundtrip patient travel time using multivariate linear regression models. We then estimated separate models by rural residence based on the Rural-Urban Continuum Code (RUCC) of a patient’s county of residence at diagnosis to understand how the association of each factor with travel time may vary for patients separated into metro residents (RUCC 1–3); and two categories of non-metro residents (RUCC 4–6) and (RUCC 7–9). Results In our sample (n = 197,498), we document large differences in mean roundtrip travel time—mean 41.5 min for RUCC 1–3 patients vs. 128.9 min for RUCC 7–9 patients. We show cervical/uterine and ovarian cancer patients travel significantly farther; as do patients traveling to higher volume and higher-ranked hospitals. Conclusions To better understand patient travel burden, providers need to understand that factors predicting longer travel time may vary by rurality of patient residence and cancer type.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8282-zRural-urban disparitiesHealth services accessibilityRural health servicesCancerTravel time
spellingShingle Joel E. Segel
Eugene J. Lengerich
Rural-urban differences in the association between individual, facility, and clinical characteristics and travel time for cancer treatment
BMC Public Health
Rural-urban disparities
Health services accessibility
Rural health services
Cancer
Travel time
title Rural-urban differences in the association between individual, facility, and clinical characteristics and travel time for cancer treatment
title_full Rural-urban differences in the association between individual, facility, and clinical characteristics and travel time for cancer treatment
title_fullStr Rural-urban differences in the association between individual, facility, and clinical characteristics and travel time for cancer treatment
title_full_unstemmed Rural-urban differences in the association between individual, facility, and clinical characteristics and travel time for cancer treatment
title_short Rural-urban differences in the association between individual, facility, and clinical characteristics and travel time for cancer treatment
title_sort rural urban differences in the association between individual facility and clinical characteristics and travel time for cancer treatment
topic Rural-urban disparities
Health services accessibility
Rural health services
Cancer
Travel time
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8282-z
work_keys_str_mv AT joelesegel ruralurbandifferencesintheassociationbetweenindividualfacilityandclinicalcharacteristicsandtraveltimeforcancertreatment
AT eugenejlengerich ruralurbandifferencesintheassociationbetweenindividualfacilityandclinicalcharacteristicsandtraveltimeforcancertreatment