Risk factors for failing sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edema

Abstract Background Sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide (STA) is less effective than intravitreal corticosteroids in the treatment of uveitic macular edema (ME), but does have some relative advantages, including substantially lower cost and decreased risk of post-injection ocular hypertension. It wo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amit K. Reddy, Jennifer L. Patnaik, Alan G. Palestine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2024-02-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-024-00386-1
_version_ 1797273624193794048
author Amit K. Reddy
Jennifer L. Patnaik
Alan G. Palestine
author_facet Amit K. Reddy
Jennifer L. Patnaik
Alan G. Palestine
author_sort Amit K. Reddy
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide (STA) is less effective than intravitreal corticosteroids in the treatment of uveitic macular edema (ME), but does have some relative advantages, including substantially lower cost and decreased risk of post-injection ocular hypertension. It would be useful for clinicians to know which eyes may respond well to STA and not necessarily require intravitreal therapy. The objective of this study is to identify risk factors for failing STA for the treatment of uveitic ME. Main body A retrospective cohort study was performed. Medical records were reviewed of patients who underwent STA for the treatment of uveitic ME between January 1, 2013, and July 31, 2022, at the University of Colorado Hospital. Uveitic ME was defined by a central subfield thickness (CST) greater than 320 μm or the presence of intra-retinal cystoid spaces on optical coherence tomography (OCT), or by the presence of petaloid macular leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA). Data collected included age, race/ethnicity, sex, history of diabetes mellitus, anatomic classification of uveitis, use of corticosteroids, use of immunomodulatory therapy, presence of intra-retinal fluid on OCT, CST on OCT, and presence of petaloid macular leakage on FA. STA failure was defined as the need for additional therapy within 12 weeks of STA due to persistent or worsening uveitic ME. One hundred eighty eyes from 131 patients were included. Forty-two eyes (23.3%) were considered treatment failures. In univariate and multivariable analysis, higher baseline CST was associated with a higher likelihood of failing STA (OR 1.17 for each 30 μm increase in CST, P = 0.016). Conclusions STA, while not as potent as intravitreal corticosteroids for the treatment of uveitic ME, was still an effective therapy, particularly for patients with lower baseline CST. Given its lower side effect profile and cost compared to intravitreal treatments, clinicians could consider STA as an initial treatment for mild uveitic ME.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:47:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ce93175ac0264853bfdf11b18680ff32
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1869-5760
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:47:03Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
spelling doaj.art-ce93175ac0264853bfdf11b18680ff322024-03-05T19:57:59ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection1869-57602024-02-011411610.1186/s12348-024-00386-1Risk factors for failing sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edemaAmit K. Reddy0Jennifer L. Patnaik1Alan G. Palestine2Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of MedicineDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of MedicineAbstract Background Sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide (STA) is less effective than intravitreal corticosteroids in the treatment of uveitic macular edema (ME), but does have some relative advantages, including substantially lower cost and decreased risk of post-injection ocular hypertension. It would be useful for clinicians to know which eyes may respond well to STA and not necessarily require intravitreal therapy. The objective of this study is to identify risk factors for failing STA for the treatment of uveitic ME. Main body A retrospective cohort study was performed. Medical records were reviewed of patients who underwent STA for the treatment of uveitic ME between January 1, 2013, and July 31, 2022, at the University of Colorado Hospital. Uveitic ME was defined by a central subfield thickness (CST) greater than 320 μm or the presence of intra-retinal cystoid spaces on optical coherence tomography (OCT), or by the presence of petaloid macular leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA). Data collected included age, race/ethnicity, sex, history of diabetes mellitus, anatomic classification of uveitis, use of corticosteroids, use of immunomodulatory therapy, presence of intra-retinal fluid on OCT, CST on OCT, and presence of petaloid macular leakage on FA. STA failure was defined as the need for additional therapy within 12 weeks of STA due to persistent or worsening uveitic ME. One hundred eighty eyes from 131 patients were included. Forty-two eyes (23.3%) were considered treatment failures. In univariate and multivariable analysis, higher baseline CST was associated with a higher likelihood of failing STA (OR 1.17 for each 30 μm increase in CST, P = 0.016). Conclusions STA, while not as potent as intravitreal corticosteroids for the treatment of uveitic ME, was still an effective therapy, particularly for patients with lower baseline CST. Given its lower side effect profile and cost compared to intravitreal treatments, clinicians could consider STA as an initial treatment for mild uveitic ME.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-024-00386-1UveitisUveitic macular edemaCorticosteroid injectionsSub-tenon’s triamcinolone acetonideIntravitreal corticosteroidsIntravitreal dexamethasone implant
spellingShingle Amit K. Reddy
Jennifer L. Patnaik
Alan G. Palestine
Risk factors for failing sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edema
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
Uveitis
Uveitic macular edema
Corticosteroid injections
Sub-tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide
Intravitreal corticosteroids
Intravitreal dexamethasone implant
title Risk factors for failing sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edema
title_full Risk factors for failing sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edema
title_fullStr Risk factors for failing sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edema
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for failing sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edema
title_short Risk factors for failing sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edema
title_sort risk factors for failing sub tenon s triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edema
topic Uveitis
Uveitic macular edema
Corticosteroid injections
Sub-tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide
Intravitreal corticosteroids
Intravitreal dexamethasone implant
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-024-00386-1
work_keys_str_mv AT amitkreddy riskfactorsforfailingsubtenonstriamcinoloneacetonideforuveiticmacularedema
AT jenniferlpatnaik riskfactorsforfailingsubtenonstriamcinoloneacetonideforuveiticmacularedema
AT alangpalestine riskfactorsforfailingsubtenonstriamcinoloneacetonideforuveiticmacularedema