Resource competition may lead to effective treatment of antibiotic resistant infections.

Drug resistance is a common problem in the fight against infectious diseases. Recent studies have shown conditions (which we call antiR) that select against resistant strains. However, no specific drug administration strategies based on this property exist yet. Here, we mathematically compare growth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio L C Gomes, James E Galagan, Daniel Segrè
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3862480?pdf=render
_version_ 1831794488615370752
author Antonio L C Gomes
James E Galagan
Daniel Segrè
author_facet Antonio L C Gomes
James E Galagan
Daniel Segrè
author_sort Antonio L C Gomes
collection DOAJ
description Drug resistance is a common problem in the fight against infectious diseases. Recent studies have shown conditions (which we call antiR) that select against resistant strains. However, no specific drug administration strategies based on this property exist yet. Here, we mathematically compare growth of resistant versus sensitive strains under different treatments (no drugs, antibiotic, and antiR), and show how a precisely timed combination of treatments may help defeat resistant strains. Our analysis is based on a previously developed model of infection and immunity in which a costly plasmid confers antibiotic resistance. As expected, antibiotic treatment increases the frequency of the resistant strain, while the plasmid cost causes a reduction of resistance in the absence of antibiotic selection. Our analysis suggests that this reduction occurs under competition for limited resources. Based on this model, we estimate treatment schedules that would lead to a complete elimination of both sensitive and resistant strains. In particular, we derive an analytical expression for the rate of resistance loss, and hence for the time necessary to turn a resistant infection into sensitive (tclear). This time depends on the experimentally measurable rates of pathogen division, growth and plasmid loss. Finally, we estimated tclear for a specific case, using available empirical data, and found that resistance may be lost up to 15 times faster under antiR treatment when compared to a no treatment regime. This strategy may be particularly suitable to treat chronic infection. Finally, our analysis suggests that accounting explicitly for a resistance-decaying rate may drastically change predicted outcomes in host-population models.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T15:50:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ce95aa88dae5414ab4e543803ba36b32
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T15:50:09Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-ce95aa88dae5414ab4e543803ba36b322022-12-21T18:20:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8077510.1371/journal.pone.0080775Resource competition may lead to effective treatment of antibiotic resistant infections.Antonio L C GomesJames E GalaganDaniel SegrèDrug resistance is a common problem in the fight against infectious diseases. Recent studies have shown conditions (which we call antiR) that select against resistant strains. However, no specific drug administration strategies based on this property exist yet. Here, we mathematically compare growth of resistant versus sensitive strains under different treatments (no drugs, antibiotic, and antiR), and show how a precisely timed combination of treatments may help defeat resistant strains. Our analysis is based on a previously developed model of infection and immunity in which a costly plasmid confers antibiotic resistance. As expected, antibiotic treatment increases the frequency of the resistant strain, while the plasmid cost causes a reduction of resistance in the absence of antibiotic selection. Our analysis suggests that this reduction occurs under competition for limited resources. Based on this model, we estimate treatment schedules that would lead to a complete elimination of both sensitive and resistant strains. In particular, we derive an analytical expression for the rate of resistance loss, and hence for the time necessary to turn a resistant infection into sensitive (tclear). This time depends on the experimentally measurable rates of pathogen division, growth and plasmid loss. Finally, we estimated tclear for a specific case, using available empirical data, and found that resistance may be lost up to 15 times faster under antiR treatment when compared to a no treatment regime. This strategy may be particularly suitable to treat chronic infection. Finally, our analysis suggests that accounting explicitly for a resistance-decaying rate may drastically change predicted outcomes in host-population models.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3862480?pdf=render
spellingShingle Antonio L C Gomes
James E Galagan
Daniel Segrè
Resource competition may lead to effective treatment of antibiotic resistant infections.
PLoS ONE
title Resource competition may lead to effective treatment of antibiotic resistant infections.
title_full Resource competition may lead to effective treatment of antibiotic resistant infections.
title_fullStr Resource competition may lead to effective treatment of antibiotic resistant infections.
title_full_unstemmed Resource competition may lead to effective treatment of antibiotic resistant infections.
title_short Resource competition may lead to effective treatment of antibiotic resistant infections.
title_sort resource competition may lead to effective treatment of antibiotic resistant infections
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3862480?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniolcgomes resourcecompetitionmayleadtoeffectivetreatmentofantibioticresistantinfections
AT jamesegalagan resourcecompetitionmayleadtoeffectivetreatmentofantibioticresistantinfections
AT danielsegre resourcecompetitionmayleadtoeffectivetreatmentofantibioticresistantinfections