KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA DALAM KEGIATAN DISKUSI MAHASISWA ANGKATAN 2016 PROGRAM STUDI DIII KEPERAWATAN SOLOK POLTEKKES KEMENKES PADANG

<p><em>Background of this research was student do not pay attention to politeness anymore. Each of them just showed their emotions rather than etiquette in language. Moreover, the main key of etiquette is can communicate properly to the hearer and behave politely while discussion is goin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elan Halid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Ahmad Dahlan 2017-04-01
Series:Bahastra
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/BAHASTRA/article/view/5957
_version_ 1818826883941269504
author Elan Halid
author_facet Elan Halid
author_sort Elan Halid
collection DOAJ
description <p><em>Background of this research was student do not pay attention to politeness anymore. Each of them just showed their emotions rather than etiquette in language. Moreover, the main key of etiquette is can communicate properly to the hearer and behave politely while discussion is going on. Interruption is permitted in discussion if students are aware of etiquette behavior. Purpose of this research was: (1) to describe the form of polite and impolite utterance in discussion activity based on student politeness principal active years 2016, 3 – years diploma of Solok Nursing Program Study Health Ministry Padang, and (2) to describe the politeness and impoliteness language sign. Type of this research was qualitative research by using descriptive method. There was no change in data of this research to make any symptoms or any certain aspect appear. Techniques of collecting data were: (1) observation and recording, and (2) field record. Data analyzing was conducted by using observation, recording and interview techniques. This stage would show the result of realization in politeness of language and also the deviation form of maxim politeness. There were 15 cooperative principles by Leech, 6 utterances were categorized as tact maxim, 4 utterances were categorized as generosity maxim, 3 utterances were categorized as approbation maxim, and 2 utterances were categorized as agreement maxim.</em></p><p> </p>
first_indexed 2024-12-19T00:34:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cec02fedf13743d0a1ceac5eaf777d1f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0215-4994
2548-4583
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T00:34:45Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
record_format Article
series Bahastra
spelling doaj.art-cec02fedf13743d0a1ceac5eaf777d1f2022-12-21T20:44:52ZengUniversitas Ahmad DahlanBahastra0215-49942548-45832017-04-013711810.26555/bahastra.v37i1.59573467KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA DALAM KEGIATAN DISKUSI MAHASISWA ANGKATAN 2016 PROGRAM STUDI DIII KEPERAWATAN SOLOK POLTEKKES KEMENKES PADANGElan Halid0Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin<p><em>Background of this research was student do not pay attention to politeness anymore. Each of them just showed their emotions rather than etiquette in language. Moreover, the main key of etiquette is can communicate properly to the hearer and behave politely while discussion is going on. Interruption is permitted in discussion if students are aware of etiquette behavior. Purpose of this research was: (1) to describe the form of polite and impolite utterance in discussion activity based on student politeness principal active years 2016, 3 – years diploma of Solok Nursing Program Study Health Ministry Padang, and (2) to describe the politeness and impoliteness language sign. Type of this research was qualitative research by using descriptive method. There was no change in data of this research to make any symptoms or any certain aspect appear. Techniques of collecting data were: (1) observation and recording, and (2) field record. Data analyzing was conducted by using observation, recording and interview techniques. This stage would show the result of realization in politeness of language and also the deviation form of maxim politeness. There were 15 cooperative principles by Leech, 6 utterances were categorized as tact maxim, 4 utterances were categorized as generosity maxim, 3 utterances were categorized as approbation maxim, and 2 utterances were categorized as agreement maxim.</em></p><p> </p>http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/BAHASTRA/article/view/5957polite language, maxim politeness, politeness and impoliteness, discussion
spellingShingle Elan Halid
KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA DALAM KEGIATAN DISKUSI MAHASISWA ANGKATAN 2016 PROGRAM STUDI DIII KEPERAWATAN SOLOK POLTEKKES KEMENKES PADANG
Bahastra
polite language, maxim politeness, politeness and impoliteness, discussion
title KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA DALAM KEGIATAN DISKUSI MAHASISWA ANGKATAN 2016 PROGRAM STUDI DIII KEPERAWATAN SOLOK POLTEKKES KEMENKES PADANG
title_full KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA DALAM KEGIATAN DISKUSI MAHASISWA ANGKATAN 2016 PROGRAM STUDI DIII KEPERAWATAN SOLOK POLTEKKES KEMENKES PADANG
title_fullStr KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA DALAM KEGIATAN DISKUSI MAHASISWA ANGKATAN 2016 PROGRAM STUDI DIII KEPERAWATAN SOLOK POLTEKKES KEMENKES PADANG
title_full_unstemmed KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA DALAM KEGIATAN DISKUSI MAHASISWA ANGKATAN 2016 PROGRAM STUDI DIII KEPERAWATAN SOLOK POLTEKKES KEMENKES PADANG
title_short KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA DALAM KEGIATAN DISKUSI MAHASISWA ANGKATAN 2016 PROGRAM STUDI DIII KEPERAWATAN SOLOK POLTEKKES KEMENKES PADANG
title_sort kesantunan berbahasa dalam kegiatan diskusi mahasiswa angkatan 2016 program studi diii keperawatan solok poltekkes kemenkes padang
topic polite language, maxim politeness, politeness and impoliteness, discussion
url http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/BAHASTRA/article/view/5957
work_keys_str_mv AT elanhalid kesantunanberbahasadalamkegiatandiskusimahasiswaangkatan2016programstudidiiikeperawatansolokpoltekkeskemenkespadang