Spatial Variability of Antarctic Surface Snow Bacterial Communities

It was once a long-held view that the Antarctic was a pristine environment with low biomass, low biodiversity and low rates of microbial activity. However, as the intensity of scientific investigation has increased, so these views have started to change. In particular, the role and impact of human a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucie A. Malard, Marie Šabacká, Iordanis Magiopoulos, Matt Mowlem, Andy Hodson, Martyn Tranter, Martin J. Siegert, David A. Pearce
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00461/full
_version_ 1819137738632331264
author Lucie A. Malard
Marie Šabacká
Iordanis Magiopoulos
Iordanis Magiopoulos
Matt Mowlem
Andy Hodson
Andy Hodson
Martyn Tranter
Martin J. Siegert
David A. Pearce
David A. Pearce
author_facet Lucie A. Malard
Marie Šabacká
Iordanis Magiopoulos
Iordanis Magiopoulos
Matt Mowlem
Andy Hodson
Andy Hodson
Martyn Tranter
Martin J. Siegert
David A. Pearce
David A. Pearce
author_sort Lucie A. Malard
collection DOAJ
description It was once a long-held view that the Antarctic was a pristine environment with low biomass, low biodiversity and low rates of microbial activity. However, as the intensity of scientific investigation has increased, so these views have started to change. In particular, the role and impact of human activity toward indigenous microbial communities has started to come under more intense scrutiny. During the Subglacial Lake Ellsworth exploration campaign in December 2012, a microbiological survey was conducted to determine the extent and likelihood of exogenous input into the subglacial lake system during the hot-water drilling process. Snow was collected from the surface to represent that used for melt water production for hot-water drilling. The results of this study showed that snow used to provide melt water differed in its microbiological composition from that of the surrounding area and raised the question of how the biogeography of snow-borne microorganisms might influence the potential outcome of scientific analyses. In this study, we investigated the biogeography of microorganisms in snow around a series of Antarctic logistic hubs, where human activity was clearly apparent, and from which scientific investigations have been undertaken. A change in microbial community structure with geographical location was apparent and, notably, a decrease in alpha diversity at more remote southern latitudes. Soil-related microorganisms dominated microbial assemblages suggesting terrestrial input, most likely from long-range aeolian transport into continental Antarctica. We also observed that relic DNA was not a major issue when assessing snow samples. Overall, our observations might have profound implications for future scientific activities in Antarctica, such as the need to establish “no-go” protected areas, the need for better characterization of field sites and improved protocols for sterilization and verification of ice drilling equipment.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T10:55:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ced074b3a8f2496bab056ff21c08c8f7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-302X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T10:55:39Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-ced074b3a8f2496bab056ff21c08c8f72022-12-21T18:28:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2019-03-011010.3389/fmicb.2019.00461431749Spatial Variability of Antarctic Surface Snow Bacterial CommunitiesLucie A. Malard0Marie Šabacká1Iordanis Magiopoulos2Iordanis Magiopoulos3Matt Mowlem4Andy Hodson5Andy Hodson6Martyn Tranter7Martin J. Siegert8David A. Pearce9David A. Pearce10Department of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, United KingdomCentre for Polar Ecology, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, České Budějovice, CzechiaInstitute of Oceanography, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, GreeceOcean Technology and Engineering Group, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, Southampton, United KingdomOcean Technology and Engineering Group, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, Southampton, United KingdomArctic Geology, University Centre in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, NorwayDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, NorwayBristol Glaciology Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, United KingdomGrantham Institute, Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, United KingdomBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United KingdomIt was once a long-held view that the Antarctic was a pristine environment with low biomass, low biodiversity and low rates of microbial activity. However, as the intensity of scientific investigation has increased, so these views have started to change. In particular, the role and impact of human activity toward indigenous microbial communities has started to come under more intense scrutiny. During the Subglacial Lake Ellsworth exploration campaign in December 2012, a microbiological survey was conducted to determine the extent and likelihood of exogenous input into the subglacial lake system during the hot-water drilling process. Snow was collected from the surface to represent that used for melt water production for hot-water drilling. The results of this study showed that snow used to provide melt water differed in its microbiological composition from that of the surrounding area and raised the question of how the biogeography of snow-borne microorganisms might influence the potential outcome of scientific analyses. In this study, we investigated the biogeography of microorganisms in snow around a series of Antarctic logistic hubs, where human activity was clearly apparent, and from which scientific investigations have been undertaken. A change in microbial community structure with geographical location was apparent and, notably, a decrease in alpha diversity at more remote southern latitudes. Soil-related microorganisms dominated microbial assemblages suggesting terrestrial input, most likely from long-range aeolian transport into continental Antarctica. We also observed that relic DNA was not a major issue when assessing snow samples. Overall, our observations might have profound implications for future scientific activities in Antarctica, such as the need to establish “no-go” protected areas, the need for better characterization of field sites and improved protocols for sterilization and verification of ice drilling equipment.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00461/fullAntarcticsnowbiogeographyEllsworth Lakemicrobial diversityrelic DNA
spellingShingle Lucie A. Malard
Marie Šabacká
Iordanis Magiopoulos
Iordanis Magiopoulos
Matt Mowlem
Andy Hodson
Andy Hodson
Martyn Tranter
Martin J. Siegert
David A. Pearce
David A. Pearce
Spatial Variability of Antarctic Surface Snow Bacterial Communities
Frontiers in Microbiology
Antarctic
snow
biogeography
Ellsworth Lake
microbial diversity
relic DNA
title Spatial Variability of Antarctic Surface Snow Bacterial Communities
title_full Spatial Variability of Antarctic Surface Snow Bacterial Communities
title_fullStr Spatial Variability of Antarctic Surface Snow Bacterial Communities
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Variability of Antarctic Surface Snow Bacterial Communities
title_short Spatial Variability of Antarctic Surface Snow Bacterial Communities
title_sort spatial variability of antarctic surface snow bacterial communities
topic Antarctic
snow
biogeography
Ellsworth Lake
microbial diversity
relic DNA
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00461/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lucieamalard spatialvariabilityofantarcticsurfacesnowbacterialcommunities
AT mariesabacka spatialvariabilityofantarcticsurfacesnowbacterialcommunities
AT iordanismagiopoulos spatialvariabilityofantarcticsurfacesnowbacterialcommunities
AT iordanismagiopoulos spatialvariabilityofantarcticsurfacesnowbacterialcommunities
AT mattmowlem spatialvariabilityofantarcticsurfacesnowbacterialcommunities
AT andyhodson spatialvariabilityofantarcticsurfacesnowbacterialcommunities
AT andyhodson spatialvariabilityofantarcticsurfacesnowbacterialcommunities
AT martyntranter spatialvariabilityofantarcticsurfacesnowbacterialcommunities
AT martinjsiegert spatialvariabilityofantarcticsurfacesnowbacterialcommunities
AT davidapearce spatialvariabilityofantarcticsurfacesnowbacterialcommunities
AT davidapearce spatialvariabilityofantarcticsurfacesnowbacterialcommunities