Experimental distributive fluvial systems: Bridging the gap between river and rock record

Abstract A debate has called into question as to which fluvial channel patterns are most widely represented in the stratigraphic record, with some advocating that distributive fluvial systems (DFS) predominate and others that a broad diversity of fluvial styles may become preserved. Critical to both...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renske C. Terwisscha van Scheltinga, William J. McMahon, Wout M. vanDijk, Joris T. Eggenhuisen, Maarten G. Kleinhans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-09-01
Series:The Depositional Record
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/dep2.124
_version_ 1818176616532017152
author Renske C. Terwisscha van Scheltinga
William J. McMahon
Wout M. vanDijk
Joris T. Eggenhuisen
Maarten G. Kleinhans
author_facet Renske C. Terwisscha van Scheltinga
William J. McMahon
Wout M. vanDijk
Joris T. Eggenhuisen
Maarten G. Kleinhans
author_sort Renske C. Terwisscha van Scheltinga
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A debate has called into question as to which fluvial channel patterns are most widely represented in the stratigraphic record, with some advocating that distributive fluvial systems (DFS) predominate and others that a broad diversity of fluvial styles may become preserved. Critical to both sides is the adequate recognition of original channel planform from geological outcrops separated from their formative processes by millions or even billions of years. In this study the river and rock record are linked through experimentally created DFSs with both aggrading channel beds and floodplains. This approach allows depositing processes and deposited strata to be studied in tandem. Proximal areas comprise coarse, amalgamated channel‐fills with scarce fine‐grained floodplain material. The overall spread of sandbody dimensions become far more varied in medial stretches, with an overall reduction in mean width and depth. In these areas channel‐fills may be sand‐rich or mud‐rich and, following avulsion, all channels are covered by floodplain sediment. Channels, levees and splays form discrete depositional bodies each with varying aspect ratios; a novel breadth of deposits and morphologies in aggrading experiments largely concurrent with proposed trends indicative of DFSs. The proportion of floodplain material increases distally, resulting in decreased interconnectedness of distal channel‐fills. Muddy floodplain sediments significantly change DFSs behaviour and subsequent stratigraphic architecture by enhancing bank stability and reducing avulsion through the filling of floodbasins. The laboratory methods utilised here open up the possibility of controlled experimentation on the effects and mechanisms of DFSs sedimentation, which is important since the modelled stratigraphic trends are rarely so tractable in ancient geological outcrop belts.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T20:19:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ced9f885ae49486f9af32974979c09d6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-4877
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T20:19:01Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Depositional Record
spelling doaj.art-ced9f885ae49486f9af32974979c09d62022-12-22T00:52:08ZengWileyThe Depositional Record2055-48772020-09-016367068410.1002/dep2.124Experimental distributive fluvial systems: Bridging the gap between river and rock recordRenske C. Terwisscha van Scheltinga0William J. McMahon1Wout M. vanDijk2Joris T. Eggenhuisen3Maarten G. Kleinhans4Faculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsFaculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsFaculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsFaculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsFaculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsAbstract A debate has called into question as to which fluvial channel patterns are most widely represented in the stratigraphic record, with some advocating that distributive fluvial systems (DFS) predominate and others that a broad diversity of fluvial styles may become preserved. Critical to both sides is the adequate recognition of original channel planform from geological outcrops separated from their formative processes by millions or even billions of years. In this study the river and rock record are linked through experimentally created DFSs with both aggrading channel beds and floodplains. This approach allows depositing processes and deposited strata to be studied in tandem. Proximal areas comprise coarse, amalgamated channel‐fills with scarce fine‐grained floodplain material. The overall spread of sandbody dimensions become far more varied in medial stretches, with an overall reduction in mean width and depth. In these areas channel‐fills may be sand‐rich or mud‐rich and, following avulsion, all channels are covered by floodplain sediment. Channels, levees and splays form discrete depositional bodies each with varying aspect ratios; a novel breadth of deposits and morphologies in aggrading experiments largely concurrent with proposed trends indicative of DFSs. The proportion of floodplain material increases distally, resulting in decreased interconnectedness of distal channel‐fills. Muddy floodplain sediments significantly change DFSs behaviour and subsequent stratigraphic architecture by enhancing bank stability and reducing avulsion through the filling of floodbasins. The laboratory methods utilised here open up the possibility of controlled experimentation on the effects and mechanisms of DFSs sedimentation, which is important since the modelled stratigraphic trends are rarely so tractable in ancient geological outcrop belts.https://doi.org/10.1002/dep2.124avulsionchannelsfacies criteriafloodplainmorphodynamicsstratigraphic record
spellingShingle Renske C. Terwisscha van Scheltinga
William J. McMahon
Wout M. vanDijk
Joris T. Eggenhuisen
Maarten G. Kleinhans
Experimental distributive fluvial systems: Bridging the gap between river and rock record
The Depositional Record
avulsion
channels
facies criteria
floodplain
morphodynamics
stratigraphic record
title Experimental distributive fluvial systems: Bridging the gap between river and rock record
title_full Experimental distributive fluvial systems: Bridging the gap between river and rock record
title_fullStr Experimental distributive fluvial systems: Bridging the gap between river and rock record
title_full_unstemmed Experimental distributive fluvial systems: Bridging the gap between river and rock record
title_short Experimental distributive fluvial systems: Bridging the gap between river and rock record
title_sort experimental distributive fluvial systems bridging the gap between river and rock record
topic avulsion
channels
facies criteria
floodplain
morphodynamics
stratigraphic record
url https://doi.org/10.1002/dep2.124
work_keys_str_mv AT renskecterwisschavanscheltinga experimentaldistributivefluvialsystemsbridgingthegapbetweenriverandrockrecord
AT williamjmcmahon experimentaldistributivefluvialsystemsbridgingthegapbetweenriverandrockrecord
AT woutmvandijk experimentaldistributivefluvialsystemsbridgingthegapbetweenriverandrockrecord
AT joristeggenhuisen experimentaldistributivefluvialsystemsbridgingthegapbetweenriverandrockrecord
AT maartengkleinhans experimentaldistributivefluvialsystemsbridgingthegapbetweenriverandrockrecord