Why Kant’s “Ethical State” Might Prove Instrumental in Challenging Current Social Pathologies

As recent social research demonstrates, the life world is increasingly impacted by a corrosion of social bonds and aggressive habits expressed, for instance, in hate speech in the social media. Significantly, such phenomena have not been prevented from evolving within the framework of constitutional...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Herta Nagl-Docekal
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University 2021-12-01
Series:Кантовский сборник
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/4976/32143/
_version_ 1830228742207700992
author Herta Nagl-Docekal
author_facet Herta Nagl-Docekal
author_sort Herta Nagl-Docekal
collection DOAJ
description As recent social research demonstrates, the life world is increasingly impacted by a corrosion of social bonds and aggressive habits expressed, for instance, in hate speech in the social media. Significantly, such phenomena have not been prevented from evolving within the framework of constitutional liberal states. In search of an appropriate mode of challenging the current social pathologies, we should examine Kant’s claim that, alongside the “juridico-civil (political) state”, an “ethico-civil state”, uniting human beings “under laws of virtue alone”, needs to be established and cultivated. Kant’s claim is discussed in comparison with “postmetaphysical” conceptions of morality, as maintained by Rawls and Habermas. These prove deficient owing to their contract-based approach. Important in the examination of the key idea of the “state of virtue” is Kant’s thesis that such a state “cannot be realized (by human organization) except in the form of a church”. In view of the fact that, today, in many parts of the world significant segments of the population adhere to agnostic or atheistic convictions, the focus is placed on Kant’s specific conception of “church” that is clearly distinct from “historical” creeds and religious practices, and on the way in which he addresses non-believers, since he insists on the intrinsic relation between morality and the “purely moral religion”. Based on these reflections, the relevance of Kant’s argument that it is “a duty of the entire human race” to establish a community in which people mutually support one another in the cultivation of moral sensitivity is scrutinised.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T10:19:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cefec1b2b2bf4cdd8151eb78d8a1cae9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0207-6918
2310-3701
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-18T10:19:25Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
record_format Article
series Кантовский сборник
spelling doaj.art-cefec1b2b2bf4cdd8151eb78d8a1cae92022-12-21T21:11:11ZdeuImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityКантовский сборник0207-69182310-37012021-12-0140415618610.5922/0207-6918-2021-4-6Why Kant’s “Ethical State” Might Prove Instrumental in Challenging Current Social PathologiesHerta Nagl-Docekal0University of ViennaAs recent social research demonstrates, the life world is increasingly impacted by a corrosion of social bonds and aggressive habits expressed, for instance, in hate speech in the social media. Significantly, such phenomena have not been prevented from evolving within the framework of constitutional liberal states. In search of an appropriate mode of challenging the current social pathologies, we should examine Kant’s claim that, alongside the “juridico-civil (political) state”, an “ethico-civil state”, uniting human beings “under laws of virtue alone”, needs to be established and cultivated. Kant’s claim is discussed in comparison with “postmetaphysical” conceptions of morality, as maintained by Rawls and Habermas. These prove deficient owing to their contract-based approach. Important in the examination of the key idea of the “state of virtue” is Kant’s thesis that such a state “cannot be realized (by human organization) except in the form of a church”. In view of the fact that, today, in many parts of the world significant segments of the population adhere to agnostic or atheistic convictions, the focus is placed on Kant’s specific conception of “church” that is clearly distinct from “historical” creeds and religious practices, and on the way in which he addresses non-believers, since he insists on the intrinsic relation between morality and the “purely moral religion”. Based on these reflections, the relevance of Kant’s argument that it is “a duty of the entire human race” to establish a community in which people mutually support one another in the cultivation of moral sensitivity is scrutinised.https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/4976/32143/social atomismmoral theoryethico-civil statelaws of virtuechurchatheismhuman racekantrawlshabermashorkheimer
spellingShingle Herta Nagl-Docekal
Why Kant’s “Ethical State” Might Prove Instrumental in Challenging Current Social Pathologies
Кантовский сборник
social atomism
moral theory
ethico-civil state
laws of virtue
church
atheism
human race
kant
rawls
habermas
horkheimer
title Why Kant’s “Ethical State” Might Prove Instrumental in Challenging Current Social Pathologies
title_full Why Kant’s “Ethical State” Might Prove Instrumental in Challenging Current Social Pathologies
title_fullStr Why Kant’s “Ethical State” Might Prove Instrumental in Challenging Current Social Pathologies
title_full_unstemmed Why Kant’s “Ethical State” Might Prove Instrumental in Challenging Current Social Pathologies
title_short Why Kant’s “Ethical State” Might Prove Instrumental in Challenging Current Social Pathologies
title_sort why kant s ethical state might prove instrumental in challenging current social pathologies
topic social atomism
moral theory
ethico-civil state
laws of virtue
church
atheism
human race
kant
rawls
habermas
horkheimer
url https://journals.kantiana.ru/kant_collection/4976/32143/
work_keys_str_mv AT hertanagldocekal whykantsethicalstatemightproveinstrumentalinchallengingcurrentsocialpathologies