CRITÉRIOS DE ESTRATIFICAÇÃO E COMPARAÇÃO DE CLASSIFICADORES SOCIOECONÔMICOS NO BRASIL

The purpose of this study was to compare the conceptual and methodological features of five classification algorithms used to produce socioeconomic stratifications of the Brazilian society, and to measure misclassification tradeoffs between them. We applied these five algorithms to classify the 55,9...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wagner Kamakura, José Afonso Mazzon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo 2016-02-01
Series:RAE: Revista de Administração de Empresas
Subjects:
Online Access:http://rae.fgv.br/sites/rae.fgv.br/files/criterios_de_estratificacao_e_comparacao_de_classificadores_socioeconomicos_no_brasil_0.pdf
_version_ 1797716617361096704
author Wagner Kamakura
José Afonso Mazzon
author_facet Wagner Kamakura
José Afonso Mazzon
author_sort Wagner Kamakura
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study was to compare the conceptual and methodological features of five classification algorithms used to produce socioeconomic stratifications of the Brazilian society, and to measure misclassification tradeoffs between them. We applied these five algorithms to classify the 55,970 households covered in the survey of household budgets (Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares [POF]) conducted by Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [IBGE]). Our results allow us to conclude that maximum-likelihood classifier had the best performance in explaining Brazilian families’ consumption patterns across the socioeconomic strata, followed by the adaptive Bayesian, simplified ABEP, old ABEP, and SAE algorithms. The first three classifiers rely on the concept of permanent income, while the first two incorporate an important innovation: classifying a household by considering its geographic location and family composition, the latter defined by the number of adults and minors living in the household. These new classifiers allow researchers and marketers to segment and study markets based on a valid, unbiased, and reliable criterion of socioeconomic stratification.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T08:25:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cf3898b0da7b40999f2cac2e154eca46
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0034-7590
2178-938X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T08:25:04Z
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo
record_format Article
series RAE: Revista de Administração de Empresas
spelling doaj.art-cf3898b0da7b40999f2cac2e154eca462023-09-02T18:12:28ZengFundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São PauloRAE: Revista de Administração de Empresas0034-75902178-938X2016-02-015615570CRITÉRIOS DE ESTRATIFICAÇÃO E COMPARAÇÃO DE CLASSIFICADORES SOCIOECONÔMICOS NO BRASILWagner Kamakura0José Afonso Mazzon 1Professor da Rice University, Jones Graduate School of Business – Houston –Texas, Estados Unidos da AméricaProfessor da Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade – São Paulo – SP, BrasilThe purpose of this study was to compare the conceptual and methodological features of five classification algorithms used to produce socioeconomic stratifications of the Brazilian society, and to measure misclassification tradeoffs between them. We applied these five algorithms to classify the 55,970 households covered in the survey of household budgets (Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares [POF]) conducted by Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [IBGE]). Our results allow us to conclude that maximum-likelihood classifier had the best performance in explaining Brazilian families’ consumption patterns across the socioeconomic strata, followed by the adaptive Bayesian, simplified ABEP, old ABEP, and SAE algorithms. The first three classifiers rely on the concept of permanent income, while the first two incorporate an important innovation: classifying a household by considering its geographic location and family composition, the latter defined by the number of adults and minors living in the household. These new classifiers allow researchers and marketers to segment and study markets based on a valid, unbiased, and reliable criterion of socioeconomic stratification.http://rae.fgv.br/sites/rae.fgv.br/files/criterios_de_estratificacao_e_comparacao_de_classificadores_socioeconomicos_no_brasil_0.pdfMarket segmentationsocioeconomic classsocioeconomic statussocioeconomic classifieremerging markets
spellingShingle Wagner Kamakura
José Afonso Mazzon
CRITÉRIOS DE ESTRATIFICAÇÃO E COMPARAÇÃO DE CLASSIFICADORES SOCIOECONÔMICOS NO BRASIL
RAE: Revista de Administração de Empresas
Market segmentation
socioeconomic class
socioeconomic status
socioeconomic classifier
emerging markets
title CRITÉRIOS DE ESTRATIFICAÇÃO E COMPARAÇÃO DE CLASSIFICADORES SOCIOECONÔMICOS NO BRASIL
title_full CRITÉRIOS DE ESTRATIFICAÇÃO E COMPARAÇÃO DE CLASSIFICADORES SOCIOECONÔMICOS NO BRASIL
title_fullStr CRITÉRIOS DE ESTRATIFICAÇÃO E COMPARAÇÃO DE CLASSIFICADORES SOCIOECONÔMICOS NO BRASIL
title_full_unstemmed CRITÉRIOS DE ESTRATIFICAÇÃO E COMPARAÇÃO DE CLASSIFICADORES SOCIOECONÔMICOS NO BRASIL
title_short CRITÉRIOS DE ESTRATIFICAÇÃO E COMPARAÇÃO DE CLASSIFICADORES SOCIOECONÔMICOS NO BRASIL
title_sort criterios de estratificacao e comparacao de classificadores socioeconomicos no brasil
topic Market segmentation
socioeconomic class
socioeconomic status
socioeconomic classifier
emerging markets
url http://rae.fgv.br/sites/rae.fgv.br/files/criterios_de_estratificacao_e_comparacao_de_classificadores_socioeconomicos_no_brasil_0.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnerkamakura criteriosdeestratificacaoecomparacaodeclassificadoressocioeconomicosnobrasil
AT joseafonsomazzon criteriosdeestratificacaoecomparacaodeclassificadoressocioeconomicosnobrasil