Ways out of the economic theory of systemic crisis. General methodological approach

Objective: to determine the ways for the economic theory to come out of systemic crisis, which is determined by its empirical nature peculiar to a proto-science with its well-known structural constraints. Methods: systemic approach, method of analogy, model-based approach. Results: basing on the res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. V. Yakovlev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd. 2018-06-01
Series:Russian Journal of Economics and Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2156
_version_ 1797255892267171840
author A. V. Yakovlev
author_facet A. V. Yakovlev
author_sort A. V. Yakovlev
collection DOAJ
description Objective: to determine the ways for the economic theory to come out of systemic crisis, which is determined by its empirical nature peculiar to a proto-science with its well-known structural constraints. Methods: systemic approach, method of analogy, model-based approach. Results: basing on the research of relations classes, the authors consider the possibilities of using the general methodological scientific tools. To achieve the set goals, the authors analyzed the scientific works demonstrating the crisis in modern economic science. The problem is the desire of researchers to either use tools and methods already developed in Economics, or to transfer methods from other subject areas. In both cases, the disadvantage is a significant amount of time spent on finding the optimal solution to the problem. The authors see the solution of the problem in the study of various spheres of science using a single methodology, based on the method of analogy and the property of systems isomorphism. In this case, it becomes possible to consider it not as a science in the usual sense, focused on the study of various categories of phenomena in a narrow subject area. It is shown that scientific knowledge as a system consists of elements and various connections between them, while the elements are equivalent in terms of these connections. Therefore, by changing the system elements for their prototypes, it is possible to obtain a description of the dependencies between the new elements. It is emphasized that to study the multilateral relations it is necessary to build integral models enabling to detect the obvious discrepancy between the structure of the object and the functional depicting of the dependencies of its properties. Scientific novelty: the process of improving the economic theory acquires an interdisciplinary nature at the intersection of economic science, methodology and general systemic disciplines. At the same time, economic science acquires a new field of research (it studies various classes of relations), a new set of knowledge and methodology. It should be noted that in such aspect the problem stated in the work is currently insufficiently studied and requires further research. The results of the research extend the idea of possible directions of improving the economic theory. The work is of problematic, largely innovative character. Practical significance: the work may be of interest to specialists in the field of Economics and related disciplines.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:15:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cf3952e7c329421db0b32d28143343b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2782-2923
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T22:13:04Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.
record_format Article
series Russian Journal of Economics and Law
spelling doaj.art-cf3952e7c329421db0b32d28143343b02024-03-20T08:16:51ZengTatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.Russian Journal of Economics and Law2782-29232018-06-0112219120310.21202/1993-047X.12.2018.2.191-2032154Ways out of the economic theory of systemic crisis. General methodological approachA. V. Yakovlev0Department of Technical Provision of Communications and Automation, Military Academy of Communications named after the USSR Marshal S. M. BudenniyObjective: to determine the ways for the economic theory to come out of systemic crisis, which is determined by its empirical nature peculiar to a proto-science with its well-known structural constraints. Methods: systemic approach, method of analogy, model-based approach. Results: basing on the research of relations classes, the authors consider the possibilities of using the general methodological scientific tools. To achieve the set goals, the authors analyzed the scientific works demonstrating the crisis in modern economic science. The problem is the desire of researchers to either use tools and methods already developed in Economics, or to transfer methods from other subject areas. In both cases, the disadvantage is a significant amount of time spent on finding the optimal solution to the problem. The authors see the solution of the problem in the study of various spheres of science using a single methodology, based on the method of analogy and the property of systems isomorphism. In this case, it becomes possible to consider it not as a science in the usual sense, focused on the study of various categories of phenomena in a narrow subject area. It is shown that scientific knowledge as a system consists of elements and various connections between them, while the elements are equivalent in terms of these connections. Therefore, by changing the system elements for their prototypes, it is possible to obtain a description of the dependencies between the new elements. It is emphasized that to study the multilateral relations it is necessary to build integral models enabling to detect the obvious discrepancy between the structure of the object and the functional depicting of the dependencies of its properties. Scientific novelty: the process of improving the economic theory acquires an interdisciplinary nature at the intersection of economic science, methodology and general systemic disciplines. At the same time, economic science acquires a new field of research (it studies various classes of relations), a new set of knowledge and methodology. It should be noted that in such aspect the problem stated in the work is currently insufficiently studied and requires further research. The results of the research extend the idea of possible directions of improving the economic theory. The work is of problematic, largely innovative character. Practical significance: the work may be of interest to specialists in the field of Economics and related disciplines.https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2156экономическая теорияэкономическая наукаэкономическая модельметодологияаналогия через изоморфизмизоморфные системыаналогия отношенийонтологияпарадигмаобъяснительная модель
spellingShingle A. V. Yakovlev
Ways out of the economic theory of systemic crisis. General methodological approach
Russian Journal of Economics and Law
экономическая теория
экономическая наука
экономическая модель
методология
аналогия через изоморфизм
изоморфные системы
аналогия отношений
онтология
парадигма
объяснительная модель
title Ways out of the economic theory of systemic crisis. General methodological approach
title_full Ways out of the economic theory of systemic crisis. General methodological approach
title_fullStr Ways out of the economic theory of systemic crisis. General methodological approach
title_full_unstemmed Ways out of the economic theory of systemic crisis. General methodological approach
title_short Ways out of the economic theory of systemic crisis. General methodological approach
title_sort ways out of the economic theory of systemic crisis general methodological approach
topic экономическая теория
экономическая наука
экономическая модель
методология
аналогия через изоморфизм
изоморфные системы
аналогия отношений
онтология
парадигма
объяснительная модель
url https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/2156
work_keys_str_mv AT avyakovlev waysoutoftheeconomictheoryofsystemiccrisisgeneralmethodologicalapproach