Thermal air–sea coupling in hindcast simulations for the North Sea and Baltic Sea on the NW European shelf

This article compares interactively coupled atmosphere–ocean hindcast simulations with stand-alone runs of the atmosphere and ocean models using the recently developed regional ocean–atmosphere model NEMO-Nordic for the North Sea and Baltic Sea. In the interactively coupled run, the ocean and the at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthias Gröger, Christian Dieterich, Markus H. E. Meier, Semjon Schimanke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Stockholm University Press 2015-07-01
Series:Tellus: Series A, Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.tellusa.net/index.php/tellusa/article/view/26911/pdf_44
_version_ 1828365389388578816
author Matthias Gröger
Christian Dieterich
Markus H. E. Meier
Semjon Schimanke
author_facet Matthias Gröger
Christian Dieterich
Markus H. E. Meier
Semjon Schimanke
author_sort Matthias Gröger
collection DOAJ
description This article compares interactively coupled atmosphere–ocean hindcast simulations with stand-alone runs of the atmosphere and ocean models using the recently developed regional ocean–atmosphere model NEMO-Nordic for the North Sea and Baltic Sea. In the interactively coupled run, the ocean and the atmosphere components were allowed to exchange mass, momentum and heat every 3 h. Our results show that interactive coupling significantly improves simulated winter sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in the Baltic Sea. The ocean and atmosphere stand-alone runs, respectively, resulted in too low sea surface and air temperatures over the Baltic Sea. These two runs suffer from too cold prescribed ERA40 SSTs, which lower air temperatures and weaken winds in the atmosphere only run. In the ocean-only run, the weaker winds additionally lower the vertical mixing thereby lowering the upward transport of warmer subpycnocline waters. By contrast, in the interactively coupled run, the ocean–atmosphere heat exchange evolved freely and demonstrated good skills in reproducing observed surface temperatures. Despite the strong impact on oceanic and atmospheric variables in the coupling area, no far reaching influence on atmospheric variables over land can be identified. In perturbation experiments, the different dynamics of the two coupling techniques is investigated in more detail by implementing strong positive winter temperature anomalies in the ocean model. Here, interactive coupling results in a substantially higher preservation of heat anomalies because the atmosphere also warmed which damped the ocean to atmosphere heat transfer. In the passively coupled set-up, this atmospheric feedback is missing, which resulted in an unrealistically high oceanic heat loss. The main added value of interactive air–sea coupling is twofold: (1) the elimination of any boundary condition at the air–sea interface and (2) the more realistic dynamical response to perturbations in the ocean–atmosphere heat balance, which will be essential in climate warming scenarios.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T05:30:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cf4698084bed40ca971ec5f8e40378a4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1600-0870
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T05:30:26Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher Stockholm University Press
record_format Article
series Tellus: Series A, Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
spelling doaj.art-cf4698084bed40ca971ec5f8e40378a42022-12-22T02:09:50ZengStockholm University PressTellus: Series A, Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography1600-08702015-07-0167012210.3402/tellusa.v67.2691126911Thermal air–sea coupling in hindcast simulations for the North Sea and Baltic Sea on the NW European shelfMatthias Gröger0Christian Dieterich1Markus H. E. Meier2Semjon Schimanke3Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Folkborgsvägen 17, 601 76 Norrköping, SwedenSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Folkborgsvägen 17, 601 76 Norrköping, SwedenSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Folkborgsvägen 17, 601 76 Norrköping, SwedenSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Folkborgsvägen 17, 601 76 Norrköping, SwedenThis article compares interactively coupled atmosphere–ocean hindcast simulations with stand-alone runs of the atmosphere and ocean models using the recently developed regional ocean–atmosphere model NEMO-Nordic for the North Sea and Baltic Sea. In the interactively coupled run, the ocean and the atmosphere components were allowed to exchange mass, momentum and heat every 3 h. Our results show that interactive coupling significantly improves simulated winter sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in the Baltic Sea. The ocean and atmosphere stand-alone runs, respectively, resulted in too low sea surface and air temperatures over the Baltic Sea. These two runs suffer from too cold prescribed ERA40 SSTs, which lower air temperatures and weaken winds in the atmosphere only run. In the ocean-only run, the weaker winds additionally lower the vertical mixing thereby lowering the upward transport of warmer subpycnocline waters. By contrast, in the interactively coupled run, the ocean–atmosphere heat exchange evolved freely and demonstrated good skills in reproducing observed surface temperatures. Despite the strong impact on oceanic and atmospheric variables in the coupling area, no far reaching influence on atmospheric variables over land can be identified. In perturbation experiments, the different dynamics of the two coupling techniques is investigated in more detail by implementing strong positive winter temperature anomalies in the ocean model. Here, interactive coupling results in a substantially higher preservation of heat anomalies because the atmosphere also warmed which damped the ocean to atmosphere heat transfer. In the passively coupled set-up, this atmospheric feedback is missing, which resulted in an unrealistically high oceanic heat loss. The main added value of interactive air–sea coupling is twofold: (1) the elimination of any boundary condition at the air–sea interface and (2) the more realistic dynamical response to perturbations in the ocean–atmosphere heat balance, which will be essential in climate warming scenarios.http://www.tellusa.net/index.php/tellusa/article/view/26911/pdf_44air–sea interactiondynamical downscalingclimate modelling
spellingShingle Matthias Gröger
Christian Dieterich
Markus H. E. Meier
Semjon Schimanke
Thermal air–sea coupling in hindcast simulations for the North Sea and Baltic Sea on the NW European shelf
Tellus: Series A, Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
air–sea interaction
dynamical downscaling
climate modelling
title Thermal air–sea coupling in hindcast simulations for the North Sea and Baltic Sea on the NW European shelf
title_full Thermal air–sea coupling in hindcast simulations for the North Sea and Baltic Sea on the NW European shelf
title_fullStr Thermal air–sea coupling in hindcast simulations for the North Sea and Baltic Sea on the NW European shelf
title_full_unstemmed Thermal air–sea coupling in hindcast simulations for the North Sea and Baltic Sea on the NW European shelf
title_short Thermal air–sea coupling in hindcast simulations for the North Sea and Baltic Sea on the NW European shelf
title_sort thermal air sea coupling in hindcast simulations for the north sea and baltic sea on the nw european shelf
topic air–sea interaction
dynamical downscaling
climate modelling
url http://www.tellusa.net/index.php/tellusa/article/view/26911/pdf_44
work_keys_str_mv AT matthiasgroger thermalairseacouplinginhindcastsimulationsforthenorthseaandbalticseaonthenweuropeanshelf
AT christiandieterich thermalairseacouplinginhindcastsimulationsforthenorthseaandbalticseaonthenweuropeanshelf
AT markushemeier thermalairseacouplinginhindcastsimulationsforthenorthseaandbalticseaonthenweuropeanshelf
AT semjonschimanke thermalairseacouplinginhindcastsimulationsforthenorthseaandbalticseaonthenweuropeanshelf