“Non-Action” and “Assistance”: Laozi’s Thoughts on How to Treat Others

How to treat others is a key topic in Laozi’s thought. Laozi not only advocates “non-action” (<i>wuwei</i> 無爲), or not interfering with others, but also hopes that actors will take some positive responsibilities for others. He expects that actors can implement the instructions of Dao 道 a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shuxun Ye
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/10/914
Description
Summary:How to treat others is a key topic in Laozi’s thought. Laozi not only advocates “non-action” (<i>wuwei</i> 無爲), or not interfering with others, but also hopes that actors will take some positive responsibilities for others. He expects that actors can implement the instructions of Dao 道 and fulfill the role of “assisting others to achieve their self-so-ness but not daring to interfere” (chapter 64). He believes that “one person will become more abundant when he contributes to others” (chapter 81); that is to say, actors and others are always in the process of mutual attainment. What he claims can be summarized by the dual assertion “to do V<sub>1</sub>, but not to do V<sub>2</sub>” (V means a type of action), containing two kinds of responsibilities: the situations represented by “not to do V<sub>2</sub>” are concrete manifestations of “non-action,” which refers to the negative responsibility of non-interference with others, while the situations signified by “to do V<sub>1</sub>” are essentially a kind of action of assisting others, which is a positive responsibility for others. There is a subtle cooperative relationship between “assistance” and “non-action.” In a nutshell, what Laozi expects is a responsibility to support others to actualize their authentic self on the premise of earnestly respecting the spontaneity and autonomy of others. When the focus on “non-action” is broken through, we can grasp Laozi’s thinking deeply and expand our understanding of his thought.
ISSN:2077-1444