A retrospective descriptive analysis of non-physician-performed prehospital endotracheal intubation practices and performance in South Africa

Abstract Introduction Prehospital advanced airway management, including endotracheal intubation (ETI), is one of the most commonly performed advanced life support skills. In South Africa, prehospital ETI is performed by non-physician prehospital providers. This practice has recently come under scrut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Craig A. Wylie, Farzana Araie, Clint Hendrikse, Jan Burke, Ivan Joubert, Anneli Hardy, Willem Stassen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-07-01
Series:BMC Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00688-4
_version_ 1828450665663299584
author Craig A. Wylie
Farzana Araie
Clint Hendrikse
Jan Burke
Ivan Joubert
Anneli Hardy
Willem Stassen
author_facet Craig A. Wylie
Farzana Araie
Clint Hendrikse
Jan Burke
Ivan Joubert
Anneli Hardy
Willem Stassen
author_sort Craig A. Wylie
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Prehospital advanced airway management, including endotracheal intubation (ETI), is one of the most commonly performed advanced life support skills. In South Africa, prehospital ETI is performed by non-physician prehospital providers. This practice has recently come under scrutiny due to lower first pass (FPS) and overall success rates, a high incidence of adverse events (AEs), and limited evidence regarding the impact of ETI on mortality. The aim of this study was to describe non-physician ETI in a South African national sample in terms of patient demographics, indications for intubation, means of intubation and success rates. A secondary aim was to determine what factors were predictive of first pass success. Methods This study was a retrospective chart review of prehospital ETIs performed by non-physician prehospital providers, between 01 January 2017 and 31 December 2017. Two national private Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and one provincial public EMS were sampled. Data were analysed descriptively and summarised. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate factors that affect the likelihood of FPS. Results A total of 926 cases were included. The majority of cases were adults (n = 781, 84.3%) and male (n = 553, 57.6%). The most common pathologies requiring emergency treatment were head injury, including traumatic brain injury (n = 328, 35.4%), followed by cardiac arrest (n = 204, 22.0%). The mean time on scene was 46 minutes (SD = 28.3). The most cited indication for intubation was decreased level of consciousness (n = 515, 55.6%), followed by cardiac arrest (n = 242, 26.9%) and ineffective ventilation (n = 96, 10.4%). Rapid sequence intubation (RSI, n = 344, 37.2%) was the most common approach. The FPS rate was 75.3%, with an overall success rate of 95.7%. Intubation failed in 33 (3.6%) patients. The need for ventilation was inversely associated with FPS (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20–0.88, p = 0.02); while deep sedation (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36–0.88, p = 0.13) and no drugs (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25–0.90, p = 0.02) compared to RSI was less likely to result in FPS. Increased scene time (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.985–0.997, p < 0.01) was inversely associated FPS. Conclusion This is one of the first and largest studies evaluating prehospital ETI in Africa. In this sample of ground-based EMS non-physician ETI, we found success rates similar to those reported in the literature. More research is needed to determine AE rates and the impact of ETI on patient outcome. There is an urgent need to standardise prehospital ETI reporting in South Africa to facilitate future research.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T23:26:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cf52826e6aaa423192636027a66d7431
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-227X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T23:26:37Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-cf52826e6aaa423192636027a66d74312022-12-22T01:29:34ZengBMCBMC Emergency Medicine1471-227X2022-07-0122111010.1186/s12873-022-00688-4A retrospective descriptive analysis of non-physician-performed prehospital endotracheal intubation practices and performance in South AfricaCraig A. Wylie0Farzana Araie1Clint Hendrikse2Jan Burke3Ivan Joubert4Anneli Hardy5Willem Stassen6Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape TownDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape TownDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape TownDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape TownDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape TownDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape TownDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape TownAbstract Introduction Prehospital advanced airway management, including endotracheal intubation (ETI), is one of the most commonly performed advanced life support skills. In South Africa, prehospital ETI is performed by non-physician prehospital providers. This practice has recently come under scrutiny due to lower first pass (FPS) and overall success rates, a high incidence of adverse events (AEs), and limited evidence regarding the impact of ETI on mortality. The aim of this study was to describe non-physician ETI in a South African national sample in terms of patient demographics, indications for intubation, means of intubation and success rates. A secondary aim was to determine what factors were predictive of first pass success. Methods This study was a retrospective chart review of prehospital ETIs performed by non-physician prehospital providers, between 01 January 2017 and 31 December 2017. Two national private Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and one provincial public EMS were sampled. Data were analysed descriptively and summarised. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate factors that affect the likelihood of FPS. Results A total of 926 cases were included. The majority of cases were adults (n = 781, 84.3%) and male (n = 553, 57.6%). The most common pathologies requiring emergency treatment were head injury, including traumatic brain injury (n = 328, 35.4%), followed by cardiac arrest (n = 204, 22.0%). The mean time on scene was 46 minutes (SD = 28.3). The most cited indication for intubation was decreased level of consciousness (n = 515, 55.6%), followed by cardiac arrest (n = 242, 26.9%) and ineffective ventilation (n = 96, 10.4%). Rapid sequence intubation (RSI, n = 344, 37.2%) was the most common approach. The FPS rate was 75.3%, with an overall success rate of 95.7%. Intubation failed in 33 (3.6%) patients. The need for ventilation was inversely associated with FPS (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20–0.88, p = 0.02); while deep sedation (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36–0.88, p = 0.13) and no drugs (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25–0.90, p = 0.02) compared to RSI was less likely to result in FPS. Increased scene time (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.985–0.997, p < 0.01) was inversely associated FPS. Conclusion This is one of the first and largest studies evaluating prehospital ETI in Africa. In this sample of ground-based EMS non-physician ETI, we found success rates similar to those reported in the literature. More research is needed to determine AE rates and the impact of ETI on patient outcome. There is an urgent need to standardise prehospital ETI reporting in South Africa to facilitate future research.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00688-4Prehospital emergency careAirway managementEndotracheal intubationSouth Africa
spellingShingle Craig A. Wylie
Farzana Araie
Clint Hendrikse
Jan Burke
Ivan Joubert
Anneli Hardy
Willem Stassen
A retrospective descriptive analysis of non-physician-performed prehospital endotracheal intubation practices and performance in South Africa
BMC Emergency Medicine
Prehospital emergency care
Airway management
Endotracheal intubation
South Africa
title A retrospective descriptive analysis of non-physician-performed prehospital endotracheal intubation practices and performance in South Africa
title_full A retrospective descriptive analysis of non-physician-performed prehospital endotracheal intubation practices and performance in South Africa
title_fullStr A retrospective descriptive analysis of non-physician-performed prehospital endotracheal intubation practices and performance in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective descriptive analysis of non-physician-performed prehospital endotracheal intubation practices and performance in South Africa
title_short A retrospective descriptive analysis of non-physician-performed prehospital endotracheal intubation practices and performance in South Africa
title_sort retrospective descriptive analysis of non physician performed prehospital endotracheal intubation practices and performance in south africa
topic Prehospital emergency care
Airway management
Endotracheal intubation
South Africa
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00688-4
work_keys_str_mv AT craigawylie aretrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT farzanaaraie aretrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT clinthendrikse aretrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT janburke aretrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT ivanjoubert aretrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT annelihardy aretrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT willemstassen aretrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT craigawylie retrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT farzanaaraie retrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT clinthendrikse retrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT janburke retrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT ivanjoubert retrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT annelihardy retrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica
AT willemstassen retrospectivedescriptiveanalysisofnonphysicianperformedprehospitalendotrachealintubationpracticesandperformanceinsouthafrica