Comparison of Climate Model Large Ensembles With Observations in the Arctic Using Simple Neural Networks

Abstract Evaluating historical simulations from global climate models (GCMs) remains an important exercise for better understanding future projections of climate change and variability in rapidly warming regions, such as the Arctic. As an alternative approach for comparing climate models and observa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zachary M. Labe, Elizabeth A. Barnes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2022-07-01
Series:Earth and Space Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002348
_version_ 1811223140285546496
author Zachary M. Labe
Elizabeth A. Barnes
author_facet Zachary M. Labe
Elizabeth A. Barnes
author_sort Zachary M. Labe
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Evaluating historical simulations from global climate models (GCMs) remains an important exercise for better understanding future projections of climate change and variability in rapidly warming regions, such as the Arctic. As an alternative approach for comparing climate models and observations, we set up a machine learning classification task using a shallow artificial neural network (ANN). Specifically, we train an ANN on maps of annual mean near‐surface temperature in the Arctic from a multi‐model large ensemble archive in order to classify which GCM produced each temperature map. After training our ANN on data from the large ensembles, we input annual mean maps of Arctic temperature from observational reanalysis and sort the prediction output according to increasing values of the ANN's confidence for each GCM class. To attempt to understand how the ANN is classifying each temperature map with a GCM, we leverage a feature attribution method from explainable artificial intelligence. By comparing composites from the attribution method for every GCM classification, we find that the ANN is learning regional temperature patterns in the Arctic that are unique to each GCM relative to the multi‐model mean ensemble. In agreement with recent studies, we show that ANNs can be useful tools for extracting regional climate signals in GCMs and observations.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T08:27:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cf620f9103e24d9395268b24e70de808
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2333-5084
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T08:27:59Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series Earth and Space Science
spelling doaj.art-cf620f9103e24d9395268b24e70de8082022-12-22T03:40:20ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth and Space Science2333-50842022-07-0197n/an/a10.1029/2022EA002348Comparison of Climate Model Large Ensembles With Observations in the Arctic Using Simple Neural NetworksZachary M. Labe0Elizabeth A. Barnes1Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USADepartment of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USAAbstract Evaluating historical simulations from global climate models (GCMs) remains an important exercise for better understanding future projections of climate change and variability in rapidly warming regions, such as the Arctic. As an alternative approach for comparing climate models and observations, we set up a machine learning classification task using a shallow artificial neural network (ANN). Specifically, we train an ANN on maps of annual mean near‐surface temperature in the Arctic from a multi‐model large ensemble archive in order to classify which GCM produced each temperature map. After training our ANN on data from the large ensembles, we input annual mean maps of Arctic temperature from observational reanalysis and sort the prediction output according to increasing values of the ANN's confidence for each GCM class. To attempt to understand how the ANN is classifying each temperature map with a GCM, we leverage a feature attribution method from explainable artificial intelligence. By comparing composites from the attribution method for every GCM classification, we find that the ANN is learning regional temperature patterns in the Arctic that are unique to each GCM relative to the multi‐model mean ensemble. In agreement with recent studies, we show that ANNs can be useful tools for extracting regional climate signals in GCMs and observations.https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002348neural networksclimate model evaluationclimate patternslarge ensemblesexplainable AIclimate change
spellingShingle Zachary M. Labe
Elizabeth A. Barnes
Comparison of Climate Model Large Ensembles With Observations in the Arctic Using Simple Neural Networks
Earth and Space Science
neural networks
climate model evaluation
climate patterns
large ensembles
explainable AI
climate change
title Comparison of Climate Model Large Ensembles With Observations in the Arctic Using Simple Neural Networks
title_full Comparison of Climate Model Large Ensembles With Observations in the Arctic Using Simple Neural Networks
title_fullStr Comparison of Climate Model Large Ensembles With Observations in the Arctic Using Simple Neural Networks
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Climate Model Large Ensembles With Observations in the Arctic Using Simple Neural Networks
title_short Comparison of Climate Model Large Ensembles With Observations in the Arctic Using Simple Neural Networks
title_sort comparison of climate model large ensembles with observations in the arctic using simple neural networks
topic neural networks
climate model evaluation
climate patterns
large ensembles
explainable AI
climate change
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002348
work_keys_str_mv AT zacharymlabe comparisonofclimatemodellargeensembleswithobservationsinthearcticusingsimpleneuralnetworks
AT elizabethabarnes comparisonofclimatemodellargeensembleswithobservationsinthearcticusingsimpleneuralnetworks