Indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates: an implementation in pigs growth rate

An alternative implementation of the animal model including indirect genetic effect (IGE) is presented considering pair-mate-specific interaction degrees to improve the performance of the model. Data consisted of average daily gain (ADG) records from 663 pigs kept in groups of 10 to 14 mates during...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Ragab, M. Piles, R. Quintanilla, J.P. Sánchez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-01-01
Series:Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731118001192
_version_ 1818665585224974336
author M. Ragab
M. Piles
R. Quintanilla
J.P. Sánchez
author_facet M. Ragab
M. Piles
R. Quintanilla
J.P. Sánchez
author_sort M. Ragab
collection DOAJ
description An alternative implementation of the animal model including indirect genetic effect (IGE) is presented considering pair-mate-specific interaction degrees to improve the performance of the model. Data consisted of average daily gain (ADG) records from 663 pigs kept in groups of 10 to 14 mates during the fattening period. Three types of models were used to fit ADG data: (i) animal model (AM); (ii) AM with classical IGE (AM-IGE); and (iii) AM fitting IGE with a specific degree of interaction between each pair of mates (AM-IGEi). Several feeding behavior phenotypes were used to define the pair-mate-specific degree of interaction in AM-IGEi: feeding rate (g/min), feeding frequency (min/day), the time between consecutive visits to the feeder (min/day), occupation time (min/day) and an index considering all these variables. All models included systematic effects batch, initial age (covariate), final age (covariate), number of pigs per pen (covariate), plus the random effect of the pen. Estimated posterior mean (posterior SD) of heritability was 0.47 (0.15) using AM. Including social genetic effects in the model, total heritable variance expressed as a proportion of total phenotypic variance (T2) was 0.54 (0.29) using AM-IGE, whereas it ranged from 0.51 to 0.55 (0.12 to 0.14) with AM-IGEi, depending on the behavior trait used to define social interactions. These results confirm the contribution of IGEs to the total heritable variation of ADG. Moreover, important differences between models were observed in EBV rankings. The percentage of coincidence of top 10% animals between AM and AM-IGEi ranged from 0.44 to 0.89 and from 0.41to 0.68 between AM-IGE and AM-IGEi. Based on the goodness of fit and predictive ability, social models are preferred for the genetic evaluation of ADG. Among models including IGEs, when the pair-specific degree of interaction was defined using feeding behavior phenotypes we obtained an increase in the accuracy of genetic parameters estimates, the better goodness of fit and higher predictive ability. We conclude that feeding behavior variables can be used to measure the interaction between pen mates and to improve the performance of models including IGEs.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T05:50:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cf7331e3af7c4f1faca52fb6b3c78935
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1751-7311
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T05:50:58Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Animal
spelling doaj.art-cf7331e3af7c4f1faca52fb6b3c789352022-12-21T22:01:10ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112019-01-01132231239Indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates: an implementation in pigs growth rateM. Ragab0M. Piles1R. Quintanilla2J.P. Sánchez3Genetica i Millora Animal, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon s/n, Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, 08140, Spain; Poultry Production Department, Kafr El-Sheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, EgyptGenetica i Millora Animal, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon s/n, Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, 08140, SpainGenetica i Millora Animal, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon s/n, Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, 08140, SpainGenetica i Millora Animal, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon s/n, Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, 08140, SpainAn alternative implementation of the animal model including indirect genetic effect (IGE) is presented considering pair-mate-specific interaction degrees to improve the performance of the model. Data consisted of average daily gain (ADG) records from 663 pigs kept in groups of 10 to 14 mates during the fattening period. Three types of models were used to fit ADG data: (i) animal model (AM); (ii) AM with classical IGE (AM-IGE); and (iii) AM fitting IGE with a specific degree of interaction between each pair of mates (AM-IGEi). Several feeding behavior phenotypes were used to define the pair-mate-specific degree of interaction in AM-IGEi: feeding rate (g/min), feeding frequency (min/day), the time between consecutive visits to the feeder (min/day), occupation time (min/day) and an index considering all these variables. All models included systematic effects batch, initial age (covariate), final age (covariate), number of pigs per pen (covariate), plus the random effect of the pen. Estimated posterior mean (posterior SD) of heritability was 0.47 (0.15) using AM. Including social genetic effects in the model, total heritable variance expressed as a proportion of total phenotypic variance (T2) was 0.54 (0.29) using AM-IGE, whereas it ranged from 0.51 to 0.55 (0.12 to 0.14) with AM-IGEi, depending on the behavior trait used to define social interactions. These results confirm the contribution of IGEs to the total heritable variation of ADG. Moreover, important differences between models were observed in EBV rankings. The percentage of coincidence of top 10% animals between AM and AM-IGEi ranged from 0.44 to 0.89 and from 0.41to 0.68 between AM-IGE and AM-IGEi. Based on the goodness of fit and predictive ability, social models are preferred for the genetic evaluation of ADG. Among models including IGEs, when the pair-specific degree of interaction was defined using feeding behavior phenotypes we obtained an increase in the accuracy of genetic parameters estimates, the better goodness of fit and higher predictive ability. We conclude that feeding behavior variables can be used to measure the interaction between pen mates and to improve the performance of models including IGEs.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731118001192genetic parameterssocial interactionsgenetic selectionanimal welfarefeeding behavior
spellingShingle M. Ragab
M. Piles
R. Quintanilla
J.P. Sánchez
Indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates: an implementation in pigs growth rate
Animal
genetic parameters
social interactions
genetic selection
animal welfare
feeding behavior
title Indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates: an implementation in pigs growth rate
title_full Indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates: an implementation in pigs growth rate
title_fullStr Indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates: an implementation in pigs growth rate
title_full_unstemmed Indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates: an implementation in pigs growth rate
title_short Indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates: an implementation in pigs growth rate
title_sort indirect genetic effect model using feeding behaviour traits to define the degree of interaction between mates an implementation in pigs growth rate
topic genetic parameters
social interactions
genetic selection
animal welfare
feeding behavior
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731118001192
work_keys_str_mv AT mragab indirectgeneticeffectmodelusingfeedingbehaviourtraitstodefinethedegreeofinteractionbetweenmatesanimplementationinpigsgrowthrate
AT mpiles indirectgeneticeffectmodelusingfeedingbehaviourtraitstodefinethedegreeofinteractionbetweenmatesanimplementationinpigsgrowthrate
AT rquintanilla indirectgeneticeffectmodelusingfeedingbehaviourtraitstodefinethedegreeofinteractionbetweenmatesanimplementationinpigsgrowthrate
AT jpsanchez indirectgeneticeffectmodelusingfeedingbehaviourtraitstodefinethedegreeofinteractionbetweenmatesanimplementationinpigsgrowthrate