The Delvigne judgment and the European franchise: going boldly… but perhaps not boldly enough
<p>In it’s recent „Delvigne“ decision, the Court took a rather bold stance on the material scope of the right to vote and to stand as a candidate at elections to the European Parliament. I will however also argue that, in some respect, this stance was not bold eno...
Main Author: | Sébastien Platon |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/the-delvigne-judgment-of-the-cjeu-going-boldly-but-perhaps-not-boldly-enough/ |
Similar Items
-
What Schrems, Delvigne and Celaj tell us about the state of fundamental rights in the EU
by: Daniel Sarmiento -
After Brexit: Time for a further Decoupling of European and National Citizenship?
by: Mark Dawson, et al. -
Empty Seats in the European Parliament: What About EU Citizenship?
by: Peter van Elsuwege -
EU Citizenship as a Means of Empowerment for Fundamental Rights During the Financial Crisis
by: Katerina Kalaitzaki
Published: (2019-02-01) -
The Penetration of Human Rights into the Agenda of the European Union
by: Hubert Smekal
Published: (2014-12-01)