Nanocarriers of Miconazole or Fluconazole: Effects on Three-Species <i>Candida</i> Biofilms and Cytotoxic Effects In Vitro

The contribution of different <i>Candida</i> species in oral fungal infections has stimulated the search for more effective therapies. This study assessed the antibiofilm effects of nanocarriers of miconazole (MCZ) or fluconazole (FLZ) on <i>Candida</i> biofilms, and their cy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Caroline Morais Caldeirão, Heitor Ceolin Araujo, Laís Salomão Arias, Wilmer Ramírez Carmona, Gustavo Porangaba Miranda, Sandra Helena Penha Oliveira, Juliano Pelim Pessan, Douglas Roberto Monteiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Fungi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/7/500
_version_ 1797529118041964544
author Anne Caroline Morais Caldeirão
Heitor Ceolin Araujo
Laís Salomão Arias
Wilmer Ramírez Carmona
Gustavo Porangaba Miranda
Sandra Helena Penha Oliveira
Juliano Pelim Pessan
Douglas Roberto Monteiro
author_facet Anne Caroline Morais Caldeirão
Heitor Ceolin Araujo
Laís Salomão Arias
Wilmer Ramírez Carmona
Gustavo Porangaba Miranda
Sandra Helena Penha Oliveira
Juliano Pelim Pessan
Douglas Roberto Monteiro
author_sort Anne Caroline Morais Caldeirão
collection DOAJ
description The contribution of different <i>Candida</i> species in oral fungal infections has stimulated the search for more effective therapies. This study assessed the antibiofilm effects of nanocarriers of miconazole (MCZ) or fluconazole (FLZ) on <i>Candida</i> biofilms, and their cytotoxic effects on murine fibroblasts. Three-species biofilms (<i>Candida albicans/Candida glabrata/Candida tropicalis</i>) were formed on 96-well plates, and they were treated with nanocarriers (iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan—“IONPs-CS”) of MCZ or FLZ at 39/78/156 µg/mL; antifungals alone at 156 µg/mL and artificial saliva were tested as positive and negative controls, respectively. Biofilms were analyzed by colony forming units (CFU), biomass, metabolic activity, and structure/viability. The cytotoxicity (L929 cells) of all treatments was determined via 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction assay. Data were submitted to one- or two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s or Fisher LSD’s tests (<i>p</i> < 0.05). IONPs-CS-MCZ at 78 µg/mL promoted similar antibiofilm and cytotoxic effects compared with MCZ at 156 µg/mL. In turn, IONPs-CS-FLZ at 156 µg/mL was overall the most effective FLZ antibiofilm treatment, surpassing the effects of FLZ alone; this nanocarrier was also less cytotoxic compared with FLZ alone. It can be concluded that both nanocarriers are more effective alternatives to fight <i>Candida</i> biofilms compared with their respective positive controls in vitro, being a promising alternative for the treatment of oral fungal infections.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:08:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cf89129e483a49a58d998334813877b1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2309-608X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:08:53Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Fungi
spelling doaj.art-cf89129e483a49a58d998334813877b12023-11-22T01:22:36ZengMDPI AGJournal of Fungi2309-608X2021-06-017750010.3390/jof7070500Nanocarriers of Miconazole or Fluconazole: Effects on Three-Species <i>Candida</i> Biofilms and Cytotoxic Effects In VitroAnne Caroline Morais Caldeirão0Heitor Ceolin Araujo1Laís Salomão Arias2Wilmer Ramírez Carmona3Gustavo Porangaba Miranda4Sandra Helena Penha Oliveira5Juliano Pelim Pessan6Douglas Roberto Monteiro7Graduate Program in Dentistry, University of Western São Paulo (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente 19050-920, SP, BrazilDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, BrazilDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, BrazilDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, BrazilSchool of Dentistry, University of Western São Paulo (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente 19050-920, SP, BrazilDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, BrazilDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araçatuba 16015-050, SP, BrazilGraduate Program in Dentistry, University of Western São Paulo (UNOESTE), Presidente Prudente 19050-920, SP, BrazilThe contribution of different <i>Candida</i> species in oral fungal infections has stimulated the search for more effective therapies. This study assessed the antibiofilm effects of nanocarriers of miconazole (MCZ) or fluconazole (FLZ) on <i>Candida</i> biofilms, and their cytotoxic effects on murine fibroblasts. Three-species biofilms (<i>Candida albicans/Candida glabrata/Candida tropicalis</i>) were formed on 96-well plates, and they were treated with nanocarriers (iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan—“IONPs-CS”) of MCZ or FLZ at 39/78/156 µg/mL; antifungals alone at 156 µg/mL and artificial saliva were tested as positive and negative controls, respectively. Biofilms were analyzed by colony forming units (CFU), biomass, metabolic activity, and structure/viability. The cytotoxicity (L929 cells) of all treatments was determined via 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction assay. Data were submitted to one- or two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s or Fisher LSD’s tests (<i>p</i> < 0.05). IONPs-CS-MCZ at 78 µg/mL promoted similar antibiofilm and cytotoxic effects compared with MCZ at 156 µg/mL. In turn, IONPs-CS-FLZ at 156 µg/mL was overall the most effective FLZ antibiofilm treatment, surpassing the effects of FLZ alone; this nanocarrier was also less cytotoxic compared with FLZ alone. It can be concluded that both nanocarriers are more effective alternatives to fight <i>Candida</i> biofilms compared with their respective positive controls in vitro, being a promising alternative for the treatment of oral fungal infections.https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/7/500antifungalsbiofilms<i>Candida</i>chitosancytotoxicityfluconazole
spellingShingle Anne Caroline Morais Caldeirão
Heitor Ceolin Araujo
Laís Salomão Arias
Wilmer Ramírez Carmona
Gustavo Porangaba Miranda
Sandra Helena Penha Oliveira
Juliano Pelim Pessan
Douglas Roberto Monteiro
Nanocarriers of Miconazole or Fluconazole: Effects on Three-Species <i>Candida</i> Biofilms and Cytotoxic Effects In Vitro
Journal of Fungi
antifungals
biofilms
<i>Candida</i>
chitosan
cytotoxicity
fluconazole
title Nanocarriers of Miconazole or Fluconazole: Effects on Three-Species <i>Candida</i> Biofilms and Cytotoxic Effects In Vitro
title_full Nanocarriers of Miconazole or Fluconazole: Effects on Three-Species <i>Candida</i> Biofilms and Cytotoxic Effects In Vitro
title_fullStr Nanocarriers of Miconazole or Fluconazole: Effects on Three-Species <i>Candida</i> Biofilms and Cytotoxic Effects In Vitro
title_full_unstemmed Nanocarriers of Miconazole or Fluconazole: Effects on Three-Species <i>Candida</i> Biofilms and Cytotoxic Effects In Vitro
title_short Nanocarriers of Miconazole or Fluconazole: Effects on Three-Species <i>Candida</i> Biofilms and Cytotoxic Effects In Vitro
title_sort nanocarriers of miconazole or fluconazole effects on three species i candida i biofilms and cytotoxic effects in vitro
topic antifungals
biofilms
<i>Candida</i>
chitosan
cytotoxicity
fluconazole
url https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/7/500
work_keys_str_mv AT annecarolinemoraiscaldeirao nanocarriersofmiconazoleorfluconazoleeffectsonthreespeciesicandidaibiofilmsandcytotoxiceffectsinvitro
AT heitorceolinaraujo nanocarriersofmiconazoleorfluconazoleeffectsonthreespeciesicandidaibiofilmsandcytotoxiceffectsinvitro
AT laissalomaoarias nanocarriersofmiconazoleorfluconazoleeffectsonthreespeciesicandidaibiofilmsandcytotoxiceffectsinvitro
AT wilmerramirezcarmona nanocarriersofmiconazoleorfluconazoleeffectsonthreespeciesicandidaibiofilmsandcytotoxiceffectsinvitro
AT gustavoporangabamiranda nanocarriersofmiconazoleorfluconazoleeffectsonthreespeciesicandidaibiofilmsandcytotoxiceffectsinvitro
AT sandrahelenapenhaoliveira nanocarriersofmiconazoleorfluconazoleeffectsonthreespeciesicandidaibiofilmsandcytotoxiceffectsinvitro
AT julianopelimpessan nanocarriersofmiconazoleorfluconazoleeffectsonthreespeciesicandidaibiofilmsandcytotoxiceffectsinvitro
AT douglasrobertomonteiro nanocarriersofmiconazoleorfluconazoleeffectsonthreespeciesicandidaibiofilmsandcytotoxiceffectsinvitro