Recovering Hidden Responder Groups in Individuals Receiving Neurofeedback for Tinnitus

The widespread understanding that chronic tinnitus is a heterogeneous phenomenon with various neural oscillatory profiles has spurred investigations into individualized approaches in its treatment. Neurofeedback, as a non-invasive tool for altering neural activity, has become increasingly popular in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Constanze Riha, Dominik Güntensperger, Tobias Kleinjung, Martin Meyer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.867704/full
_version_ 1828315102042914816
author Constanze Riha
Constanze Riha
Dominik Güntensperger
Tobias Kleinjung
Tobias Kleinjung
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer
author_facet Constanze Riha
Constanze Riha
Dominik Güntensperger
Tobias Kleinjung
Tobias Kleinjung
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer
author_sort Constanze Riha
collection DOAJ
description The widespread understanding that chronic tinnitus is a heterogeneous phenomenon with various neural oscillatory profiles has spurred investigations into individualized approaches in its treatment. Neurofeedback, as a non-invasive tool for altering neural activity, has become increasingly popular in the personalized treatment of a wide range of neuropsychological disorders. Despite the success of neurofeedback on the group level, the variability in the treatment efficacy on the individual level is high, and evidence from recent studies shows that only a small number of people can effectively modulate the desired aspects of neural activity. To reveal who may be more suitable, and hence benefit most from neurofeedback treatment, we classified individuals into unobserved subgroups with similar oscillatory trajectories during the treatment and investigated how subgroup membership was predicted by a series of characteristics. Growth mixture modeling was used to identify distinct latent subgroups with similar oscillatory trajectories among 50 individuals suffering from chronic subjective tinnitus (38 male, 12 female, mean age = 47.1 ± 12.84) across 15 neurofeedback training sessions. Further, the impact of characteristics and how they predicted the affiliation in the identified subgroups was evaluated by including measures of demographics, tinnitus-specific (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory) and depression variables, as well as subjective quality of life subscales (World Health Organization—Quality of Life Questionnaire), and health-related quality of life subscales (Short Form-36) in a logistic regression analysis. A latent class model could be fitted to the longitudinal data with a high probability of correctly classifying distinct oscillatory patterns into 3 different groups: non-responder (80%), responder (16%), and decliner (4%). Further, our results show that the health-related wellbeing subscale of the Short Form-36 questionnaire was differentially associated with the groups. However, due to the small sample size in the Responder group, we are not able to provide sufficient evidence for a distinct responder profile. Nevertheless, the identification of oscillatory change-rate differences across distinct groups of individuals provides the groundwork from which to tease apart the complex and heterogeneous oscillatory processes underlying tinnitus and the attempts to modify these through neurofeedback. While more research is needed, our results and the analytical approach presented may bring clarity to contradictory past findings in the field of tinnitus research, and eventually influence clinical practice.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T16:55:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cf9c7ea3d23243c0b32757886a24a7ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T16:55:23Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-cf9c7ea3d23243c0b32757886a24a7ea2022-12-22T02:38:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2022-06-011610.3389/fnins.2022.867704867704Recovering Hidden Responder Groups in Individuals Receiving Neurofeedback for TinnitusConstanze Riha0Constanze Riha1Dominik Güntensperger2Tobias Kleinjung3Tobias Kleinjung4Martin Meyer5Martin Meyer6Martin Meyer7Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandResearch Priority Program “ESIT—European School of Interdisciplinary Tinnitus Research,” Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandNeuroscience Center Zurich (ZNZ), ETH Zürich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandNeuroscience Center Zurich (ZNZ), ETH Zürich, Zurich, SwitzerlandUniversity Research Priority Program “Dynamics of Healthy Aging,” University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandThe widespread understanding that chronic tinnitus is a heterogeneous phenomenon with various neural oscillatory profiles has spurred investigations into individualized approaches in its treatment. Neurofeedback, as a non-invasive tool for altering neural activity, has become increasingly popular in the personalized treatment of a wide range of neuropsychological disorders. Despite the success of neurofeedback on the group level, the variability in the treatment efficacy on the individual level is high, and evidence from recent studies shows that only a small number of people can effectively modulate the desired aspects of neural activity. To reveal who may be more suitable, and hence benefit most from neurofeedback treatment, we classified individuals into unobserved subgroups with similar oscillatory trajectories during the treatment and investigated how subgroup membership was predicted by a series of characteristics. Growth mixture modeling was used to identify distinct latent subgroups with similar oscillatory trajectories among 50 individuals suffering from chronic subjective tinnitus (38 male, 12 female, mean age = 47.1 ± 12.84) across 15 neurofeedback training sessions. Further, the impact of characteristics and how they predicted the affiliation in the identified subgroups was evaluated by including measures of demographics, tinnitus-specific (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory) and depression variables, as well as subjective quality of life subscales (World Health Organization—Quality of Life Questionnaire), and health-related quality of life subscales (Short Form-36) in a logistic regression analysis. A latent class model could be fitted to the longitudinal data with a high probability of correctly classifying distinct oscillatory patterns into 3 different groups: non-responder (80%), responder (16%), and decliner (4%). Further, our results show that the health-related wellbeing subscale of the Short Form-36 questionnaire was differentially associated with the groups. However, due to the small sample size in the Responder group, we are not able to provide sufficient evidence for a distinct responder profile. Nevertheless, the identification of oscillatory change-rate differences across distinct groups of individuals provides the groundwork from which to tease apart the complex and heterogeneous oscillatory processes underlying tinnitus and the attempts to modify these through neurofeedback. While more research is needed, our results and the analytical approach presented may bring clarity to contradictory past findings in the field of tinnitus research, and eventually influence clinical practice.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.867704/fulltinnitusneurofeedback (NFB)inefficacy problemEEGbrain computer interfacegrowth mixture model
spellingShingle Constanze Riha
Constanze Riha
Dominik Güntensperger
Tobias Kleinjung
Tobias Kleinjung
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer
Recovering Hidden Responder Groups in Individuals Receiving Neurofeedback for Tinnitus
Frontiers in Neuroscience
tinnitus
neurofeedback (NFB)
inefficacy problem
EEG
brain computer interface
growth mixture model
title Recovering Hidden Responder Groups in Individuals Receiving Neurofeedback for Tinnitus
title_full Recovering Hidden Responder Groups in Individuals Receiving Neurofeedback for Tinnitus
title_fullStr Recovering Hidden Responder Groups in Individuals Receiving Neurofeedback for Tinnitus
title_full_unstemmed Recovering Hidden Responder Groups in Individuals Receiving Neurofeedback for Tinnitus
title_short Recovering Hidden Responder Groups in Individuals Receiving Neurofeedback for Tinnitus
title_sort recovering hidden responder groups in individuals receiving neurofeedback for tinnitus
topic tinnitus
neurofeedback (NFB)
inefficacy problem
EEG
brain computer interface
growth mixture model
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.867704/full
work_keys_str_mv AT constanzeriha recoveringhiddenrespondergroupsinindividualsreceivingneurofeedbackfortinnitus
AT constanzeriha recoveringhiddenrespondergroupsinindividualsreceivingneurofeedbackfortinnitus
AT dominikguntensperger recoveringhiddenrespondergroupsinindividualsreceivingneurofeedbackfortinnitus
AT tobiaskleinjung recoveringhiddenrespondergroupsinindividualsreceivingneurofeedbackfortinnitus
AT tobiaskleinjung recoveringhiddenrespondergroupsinindividualsreceivingneurofeedbackfortinnitus
AT martinmeyer recoveringhiddenrespondergroupsinindividualsreceivingneurofeedbackfortinnitus
AT martinmeyer recoveringhiddenrespondergroupsinindividualsreceivingneurofeedbackfortinnitus
AT martinmeyer recoveringhiddenrespondergroupsinindividualsreceivingneurofeedbackfortinnitus