Examining Alternatives to Painful Piglet Castration Within the Contexts of Markets and Stakeholders: A Comparison of Four EU Countries

To avoid the occurrence of boar taint in pork, the castration of piglets without pain relief is a common practice in many European countries. The public has been calling for more animal-friendly alternatives, which include anesthesia/analgesia, immunocastration, and the raising of entire males. To p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li Lin-Schilstra, Paul T.M. Ingenbleek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/2/486
_version_ 1797396816360112128
author Li Lin-Schilstra
Paul T.M. Ingenbleek
author_facet Li Lin-Schilstra
Paul T.M. Ingenbleek
author_sort Li Lin-Schilstra
collection DOAJ
description To avoid the occurrence of boar taint in pork, the castration of piglets without pain relief is a common practice in many European countries. The public has been calling for more animal-friendly alternatives, which include anesthesia/analgesia, immunocastration, and the raising of entire males. To prevent potential trade barriers, the European Commission was initially more in favour of a single method. To date, however, only six countries have passed laws banning castration, and the pig farmers in these countries have chosen different alternatives. To understand the reasons behind the continuing fragmentation, this study examines the issue of castration within the context of four national pork production systems: in the Netherlands, France, Slovenia, and Germany. Drawing on in-depth qualitative data, the study demonstrates that stakeholders are generally willing to abandon the practice of piglet castration without anesthesia/analgesia. Their preferences for alternatives are largely dependent on contextual factors, however, including the structure, scale, and cost and quality orientation of the production system. The results imply that, although a single solution for castration is unlikely to evolve amongst the diverse pork-production systems in Europe, a future without the painful castration of piglets is possible if alternatives are accepted to coexist.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T00:56:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cf9fb8f0626b4ae0924196925046177e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T00:56:02Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-cf9fb8f0626b4ae0924196925046177e2023-12-11T16:53:42ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-02-0111248610.3390/ani11020486Examining Alternatives to Painful Piglet Castration Within the Contexts of Markets and Stakeholders: A Comparison of Four EU CountriesLi Lin-Schilstra0Paul T.M. Ingenbleek1College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, ChinaMarketing and Consumer Behaviour Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6706KN Wageningen, The NetherlandsTo avoid the occurrence of boar taint in pork, the castration of piglets without pain relief is a common practice in many European countries. The public has been calling for more animal-friendly alternatives, which include anesthesia/analgesia, immunocastration, and the raising of entire males. To prevent potential trade barriers, the European Commission was initially more in favour of a single method. To date, however, only six countries have passed laws banning castration, and the pig farmers in these countries have chosen different alternatives. To understand the reasons behind the continuing fragmentation, this study examines the issue of castration within the context of four national pork production systems: in the Netherlands, France, Slovenia, and Germany. Drawing on in-depth qualitative data, the study demonstrates that stakeholders are generally willing to abandon the practice of piglet castration without anesthesia/analgesia. Their preferences for alternatives are largely dependent on contextual factors, however, including the structure, scale, and cost and quality orientation of the production system. The results imply that, although a single solution for castration is unlikely to evolve amongst the diverse pork-production systems in Europe, a future without the painful castration of piglets is possible if alternatives are accepted to coexist.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/2/486animal welfarepig castrationEuropean unionmultiple case studies
spellingShingle Li Lin-Schilstra
Paul T.M. Ingenbleek
Examining Alternatives to Painful Piglet Castration Within the Contexts of Markets and Stakeholders: A Comparison of Four EU Countries
Animals
animal welfare
pig castration
European union
multiple case studies
title Examining Alternatives to Painful Piglet Castration Within the Contexts of Markets and Stakeholders: A Comparison of Four EU Countries
title_full Examining Alternatives to Painful Piglet Castration Within the Contexts of Markets and Stakeholders: A Comparison of Four EU Countries
title_fullStr Examining Alternatives to Painful Piglet Castration Within the Contexts of Markets and Stakeholders: A Comparison of Four EU Countries
title_full_unstemmed Examining Alternatives to Painful Piglet Castration Within the Contexts of Markets and Stakeholders: A Comparison of Four EU Countries
title_short Examining Alternatives to Painful Piglet Castration Within the Contexts of Markets and Stakeholders: A Comparison of Four EU Countries
title_sort examining alternatives to painful piglet castration within the contexts of markets and stakeholders a comparison of four eu countries
topic animal welfare
pig castration
European union
multiple case studies
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/2/486
work_keys_str_mv AT lilinschilstra examiningalternativestopainfulpigletcastrationwithinthecontextsofmarketsandstakeholdersacomparisonoffoureucountries
AT paultmingenbleek examiningalternativestopainfulpigletcastrationwithinthecontextsofmarketsandstakeholdersacomparisonoffoureucountries