Pragmatization of Narrative in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy: A Modern Perspective
The main views on the nature of narrative in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy are analyzed. It is shown how, realizing the research narrative, he paid attention to the linguistic means of expression of our thoughts, reference to the actual reality, the logical component of argumentation. It is shown...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | ces |
| Published: |
Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
2023-08-01
|
| Series: | Organon F |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/09241032orgf.2022.29302.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797945700380573696 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrii Synytsia |
| author_facet | Andrii Synytsia |
| author_sort | Andrii Synytsia |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The main views on the nature of narrative in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy are analyzed. It is shown how, realizing the research narrative, he paid attention to the linguistic means of expression of our thoughts, reference to the actual reality, the logical component of argumentation. It is shown that in order to place worldview ac-cents more clearly and strengthen the expressive effect of thought, Wittgenstein pragmatized the narrative, in particular, used metaphors, images of learning, took into account the historico-cultural context. It is important for him to show that the form of the narrative influences what meanings the interlocutor will comprehend. Through a system of micro- and macro-narratives, Wittgenstein intended to express his opinion as clearly as possible, although he made the reader an active participant in the narrative. The thinker did not deviate from the analytico-scientific standards of philosophizing, although he showed that the relevant analysis of the narrative is significantly complicated by the ambiguities of its interpretation, the uniqueness of human experience and the identity of each narrator’s value system. It is argued that a pragmatic approach to narrative analysis significantly expands the research methodology of the analytic thinker and, accordingly, makes it possible to deepen our understanding of reality and human existence, as well as more clearly define the specifics of their knowledge. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T20:59:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-cfb74425a6e7483cade5e82b10ff2fea |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1335-0668 2585-7150 |
| language | ces |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T20:59:15Z |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Organon F |
| spelling | doaj.art-cfb74425a6e7483cade5e82b10ff2fea2023-01-22T12:49:22ZcesInstitute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of SciencesOrganon F1335-06682585-71502023-08-01293327347https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2022.29302Pragmatization of Narrative in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy: A Modern PerspectiveAndrii Synytsia0Ivan Franko National University of LvivThe main views on the nature of narrative in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy are analyzed. It is shown how, realizing the research narrative, he paid attention to the linguistic means of expression of our thoughts, reference to the actual reality, the logical component of argumentation. It is shown that in order to place worldview ac-cents more clearly and strengthen the expressive effect of thought, Wittgenstein pragmatized the narrative, in particular, used metaphors, images of learning, took into account the historico-cultural context. It is important for him to show that the form of the narrative influences what meanings the interlocutor will comprehend. Through a system of micro- and macro-narratives, Wittgenstein intended to express his opinion as clearly as possible, although he made the reader an active participant in the narrative. The thinker did not deviate from the analytico-scientific standards of philosophizing, although he showed that the relevant analysis of the narrative is significantly complicated by the ambiguities of its interpretation, the uniqueness of human experience and the identity of each narrator’s value system. It is argued that a pragmatic approach to narrative analysis significantly expands the research methodology of the analytic thinker and, accordingly, makes it possible to deepen our understanding of reality and human existence, as well as more clearly define the specifics of their knowledge.https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/09241032orgf.2022.29302.pdfnarrativepragmatic analysisform of lifelanguagewittgenstein |
| spellingShingle | Andrii Synytsia Pragmatization of Narrative in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy: A Modern Perspective Organon F narrative pragmatic analysis form of life language wittgenstein |
| title | Pragmatization of Narrative in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy: A Modern Perspective |
| title_full | Pragmatization of Narrative in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy: A Modern Perspective |
| title_fullStr | Pragmatization of Narrative in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy: A Modern Perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pragmatization of Narrative in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy: A Modern Perspective |
| title_short | Pragmatization of Narrative in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy: A Modern Perspective |
| title_sort | pragmatization of narrative in wittgenstein s later philosophy a modern perspective |
| topic | narrative pragmatic analysis form of life language wittgenstein |
| url | https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/09241032orgf.2022.29302.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andriisynytsia pragmatizationofnarrativeinwittgensteinslaterphilosophyamodernperspective |