Public and decision-maker stated preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy decisions in Iran: an application of the discrete choice experiment
Background The argument about funding criteria poses challenges for health decision-makers in all countries. This study aimed to investigate the public and decision-maker preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy decisions in Iran. Methods A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used for eliciting the p...
Main Authors: | Gita Afsharmanesh, Farimah Rahimi, Leila Zarei, Farzad Peiravian, Gholamhossein Mehralian |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-021-00365-0 |
Similar Items
-
Eliciting the public preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy in Iran: a discrete choice experiment study
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Pharmaceutical subsidy policy in Iran: a qualitative stakeholder analysis
by: Alireza Olyaaeemanesh, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Rural job preferences of graduate class medical students in Ethiopia—a discrete choice experiment (DCE)
by: Mamo Engidaw, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Not all subsidies are equal: measuring preferences for electric vehicle financial incentives
by: Laura Roberson, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
An application of analytic network process model in supporting decision making to address pharmaceutical shortage
by: Leila Zarei, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)