Learning Transfer, Peer Feedback, and Massive Open Online Courses

Peer-to-peer interaction is a key component of learning across nearly all educational contexts, from face-to-face and hybrid courses to flipped, online, and distance education. [1] Peer feedback on writing is a form of peer interaction that has been shown across learning contexts to have considerabl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Denise Comer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics 2017-02-01
Series:Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.iiisci.org/Journal/CV$/sci/pdfs/SA611XH16.pdf
_version_ 1819119574625288192
author Denise Comer
author_facet Denise Comer
author_sort Denise Comer
collection DOAJ
description Peer-to-peer interaction is a key component of learning across nearly all educational contexts, from face-to-face and hybrid courses to flipped, online, and distance education. [1] Peer feedback on writing is a form of peer interaction that has been shown across learning contexts to have considerable positive impacts. [2] The potential for peer feedback acquires heightened potential and complexity in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) due to their scale and learner diversity. [3] One ongoing and oft-cited concern surrounding peer feedback involves negative attitudes about whether peers have the capacities needed to provide meaningful, reliable response to one another. [4] Such a problem is, arguably, magnified in a MOOC with the diversity of learners. This study proposes refocusing this problem by exploring instead the learning outcomes learners gain from providing peer feedback. This paper will present the background, methods, and emerging results of an IRB-approved qualitative coding study of over 6,000 discursive comments from students enrolled in a MOOC about what they learned from providing peer feedback. [1] Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science. New York: Routledge. [2] Holt, M. (1992). The value of written peer criticism. College Composition and Communication, 43(3), 384- 392. [3] Comer, D. K., Clark, C. R., and Canelas, D. A. (2014). Writing to learn and learning to write across the disciplines: Peer-to-peer writing in introductory-level MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5). [4] Furman, B., and Robinson, W. (2003). Improving engineering report writing with Calibrated Peer Review™. In D. Budny (Ed.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Digital Library.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T06:06:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cfc5d449d1fd4af7b011f7ac23b1b5a1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1690-4524
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T06:06:56Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics
record_format Article
series Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
spelling doaj.art-cfc5d449d1fd4af7b011f7ac23b1b5a12022-12-21T18:36:23ZengInternational Institute of Informatics and CyberneticsJournal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics1690-45242017-02-011514452Learning Transfer, Peer Feedback, and Massive Open Online CoursesDenise ComerPeer-to-peer interaction is a key component of learning across nearly all educational contexts, from face-to-face and hybrid courses to flipped, online, and distance education. [1] Peer feedback on writing is a form of peer interaction that has been shown across learning contexts to have considerable positive impacts. [2] The potential for peer feedback acquires heightened potential and complexity in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) due to their scale and learner diversity. [3] One ongoing and oft-cited concern surrounding peer feedback involves negative attitudes about whether peers have the capacities needed to provide meaningful, reliable response to one another. [4] Such a problem is, arguably, magnified in a MOOC with the diversity of learners. This study proposes refocusing this problem by exploring instead the learning outcomes learners gain from providing peer feedback. This paper will present the background, methods, and emerging results of an IRB-approved qualitative coding study of over 6,000 discursive comments from students enrolled in a MOOC about what they learned from providing peer feedback. [1] Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science. New York: Routledge. [2] Holt, M. (1992). The value of written peer criticism. College Composition and Communication, 43(3), 384- 392. [3] Comer, D. K., Clark, C. R., and Canelas, D. A. (2014). Writing to learn and learning to write across the disciplines: Peer-to-peer writing in introductory-level MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5). [4] Furman, B., and Robinson, W. (2003). Improving engineering report writing with Calibrated Peer Review™. In D. Budny (Ed.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Digital Library.http://www.iiisci.org/Journal/CV$/sci/pdfs/SA611XH16.pdf Peer FeedbackWritingMassive Open Online Courses
spellingShingle Denise Comer
Learning Transfer, Peer Feedback, and Massive Open Online Courses
Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
Peer Feedback
Writing
Massive Open Online Courses
title Learning Transfer, Peer Feedback, and Massive Open Online Courses
title_full Learning Transfer, Peer Feedback, and Massive Open Online Courses
title_fullStr Learning Transfer, Peer Feedback, and Massive Open Online Courses
title_full_unstemmed Learning Transfer, Peer Feedback, and Massive Open Online Courses
title_short Learning Transfer, Peer Feedback, and Massive Open Online Courses
title_sort learning transfer peer feedback and massive open online courses
topic Peer Feedback
Writing
Massive Open Online Courses
url http://www.iiisci.org/Journal/CV$/sci/pdfs/SA611XH16.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT denisecomer learningtransferpeerfeedbackandmassiveopenonlinecourses