A State of Art Review on Methodologies of Occupancy Estimating in Buildings from 2011 to 2021

Occupancy information is important to building facility managers in terms of building energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality, comfort conditions, and safety management of buildings. When combing the distribution characteristics of the literature, it is found that the field of estimating occ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liang Zhao, Yuxin Li, Ruobing Liang, Peng Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Electronics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/19/3173
_version_ 1797479818164436992
author Liang Zhao
Yuxin Li
Ruobing Liang
Peng Wang
author_facet Liang Zhao
Yuxin Li
Ruobing Liang
Peng Wang
author_sort Liang Zhao
collection DOAJ
description Occupancy information is important to building facility managers in terms of building energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality, comfort conditions, and safety management of buildings. When combing the distribution characteristics of the literature, it is found that the field of estimating occupancy counts is a very active area. Researchers from various countries have undertaken extensive explorations to obtain more research results. In this survey, the commonly used occupancy measurement systems and algorithms are described. Through the analysis and research of different occupancy measurement systems and algorithms, their advantages, disadvantages, and limitations are summarized, so that researchers can use them selectively. As for how to choose the method of estimating occupancy counts, suggestions are given in terms of the range of people, accuracy, cost, and privacy. There are still many pressing issues relating to high-density crowd occupancy counting, complex environmental impact, and system robustness. According to the current research progress and technology development trend, the possible future research directions are pointed out. The innovation of this review is the quantitative analysis of the selection of occupancy measurement systems for different ranges of people, and the occupancy counting accuracy situation of different measurement systems and algorithms. It provides more informed opinions on the selection of practical applications. It can be used by other researchers as a starting point for their research and/or project work.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T21:51:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cfcaf7ff1be6413fb4edff7a2a02c418
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-9292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T21:51:16Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Electronics
spelling doaj.art-cfcaf7ff1be6413fb4edff7a2a02c4182023-11-23T20:07:35ZengMDPI AGElectronics2079-92922022-10-011119317310.3390/electronics11193173A State of Art Review on Methodologies of Occupancy Estimating in Buildings from 2011 to 2021Liang Zhao0Yuxin Li1Ruobing Liang2Peng Wang3School of Control Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, ChinaSchool of Control Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, ChinaFaculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, ChinaFaculty of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, ChinaOccupancy information is important to building facility managers in terms of building energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality, comfort conditions, and safety management of buildings. When combing the distribution characteristics of the literature, it is found that the field of estimating occupancy counts is a very active area. Researchers from various countries have undertaken extensive explorations to obtain more research results. In this survey, the commonly used occupancy measurement systems and algorithms are described. Through the analysis and research of different occupancy measurement systems and algorithms, their advantages, disadvantages, and limitations are summarized, so that researchers can use them selectively. As for how to choose the method of estimating occupancy counts, suggestions are given in terms of the range of people, accuracy, cost, and privacy. There are still many pressing issues relating to high-density crowd occupancy counting, complex environmental impact, and system robustness. According to the current research progress and technology development trend, the possible future research directions are pointed out. The innovation of this review is the quantitative analysis of the selection of occupancy measurement systems for different ranges of people, and the occupancy counting accuracy situation of different measurement systems and algorithms. It provides more informed opinions on the selection of practical applications. It can be used by other researchers as a starting point for their research and/or project work.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/19/3173occupancy countingoccupancy measurementmachine learning
spellingShingle Liang Zhao
Yuxin Li
Ruobing Liang
Peng Wang
A State of Art Review on Methodologies of Occupancy Estimating in Buildings from 2011 to 2021
Electronics
occupancy counting
occupancy measurement
machine learning
title A State of Art Review on Methodologies of Occupancy Estimating in Buildings from 2011 to 2021
title_full A State of Art Review on Methodologies of Occupancy Estimating in Buildings from 2011 to 2021
title_fullStr A State of Art Review on Methodologies of Occupancy Estimating in Buildings from 2011 to 2021
title_full_unstemmed A State of Art Review on Methodologies of Occupancy Estimating in Buildings from 2011 to 2021
title_short A State of Art Review on Methodologies of Occupancy Estimating in Buildings from 2011 to 2021
title_sort state of art review on methodologies of occupancy estimating in buildings from 2011 to 2021
topic occupancy counting
occupancy measurement
machine learning
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/19/3173
work_keys_str_mv AT liangzhao astateofartreviewonmethodologiesofoccupancyestimatinginbuildingsfrom2011to2021
AT yuxinli astateofartreviewonmethodologiesofoccupancyestimatinginbuildingsfrom2011to2021
AT ruobingliang astateofartreviewonmethodologiesofoccupancyestimatinginbuildingsfrom2011to2021
AT pengwang astateofartreviewonmethodologiesofoccupancyestimatinginbuildingsfrom2011to2021
AT liangzhao stateofartreviewonmethodologiesofoccupancyestimatinginbuildingsfrom2011to2021
AT yuxinli stateofartreviewonmethodologiesofoccupancyestimatinginbuildingsfrom2011to2021
AT ruobingliang stateofartreviewonmethodologiesofoccupancyestimatinginbuildingsfrom2011to2021
AT pengwang stateofartreviewonmethodologiesofoccupancyestimatinginbuildingsfrom2011to2021