A comparison of visual outcomes at age 8 years in children detected by pre-school screening with those detected at reception screening

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of screening for visual defects in a cohort of pre-school children (3–3.5 years) versus screening in primary school children (4–5.25 years). Specifically we compared the numbers attending in each group and the visual outcomes at age 8 years. Methods: The design was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carol Y. Buckley, Allyson M. Perkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: White Rose University Press 2010-08-01
Series:British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/22
_version_ 1819263158470049792
author Carol Y. Buckley
Allyson M. Perkins
author_facet Carol Y. Buckley
Allyson M. Perkins
author_sort Carol Y. Buckley
collection DOAJ
description Aim: To compare the effectiveness of screening for visual defects in a cohort of pre-school children (3–3.5 years) versus screening in primary school children (4–5.25 years). Specifically we compared the numbers attending in each group and the visual outcomes at age 8 years. Methods: The design was an observational prospective cohort study comparing children screened and treated in two age groups on visual outcome in the worse seeing eye at 8 years of age. The cohorts were matched for socio-economic status by area of residence. A positive outcome was defined as an improvement in vision of 0.3 logMAR or more in the worse seeing eye from the baseline visual acuity to final follow-up. Results: In the pre-school group, 414 (52.3%) children were screened out of 792 invitees. In the school group, 785 (94.9%) children were screened out of 827 invitees. Sensitivity and specificity of the screening were similar for the two groups, but the increased uptake at school enabled many more children to be screened. After treatment, a positive outcome in the worse seeing eye was achieved in 18 of 42 children (43%) of the pre-school group and in 41 of 84 children (49%) of the school group. Conclusion: Our study suggests that it may be better to screen children at school because it is much easier to achieve coverage of the population. Visual outcome at age 8 years appears to be similar in children screened at pre-school age and those screened at school.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T20:09:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cfcfda5988274664be17948531cb5235
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2516-3590
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T20:09:08Z
publishDate 2010-08-01
publisher White Rose University Press
record_format Article
series British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
spelling doaj.art-cfcfda5988274664be17948531cb52352022-12-21T17:32:51ZengWhite Rose University PressBritish and Irish Orthoptic Journal2516-35902010-08-017303610.22599/bioj.2221A comparison of visual outcomes at age 8 years in children detected by pre-school screening with those detected at reception screeningCarol Y. Buckley0Allyson M. Perkins1Orthoptic Department, Royal Preston Hospital, PrestonOrthoptic Department, Royal Preston Hospital, PrestonAim: To compare the effectiveness of screening for visual defects in a cohort of pre-school children (3–3.5 years) versus screening in primary school children (4–5.25 years). Specifically we compared the numbers attending in each group and the visual outcomes at age 8 years. Methods: The design was an observational prospective cohort study comparing children screened and treated in two age groups on visual outcome in the worse seeing eye at 8 years of age. The cohorts were matched for socio-economic status by area of residence. A positive outcome was defined as an improvement in vision of 0.3 logMAR or more in the worse seeing eye from the baseline visual acuity to final follow-up. Results: In the pre-school group, 414 (52.3%) children were screened out of 792 invitees. In the school group, 785 (94.9%) children were screened out of 827 invitees. Sensitivity and specificity of the screening were similar for the two groups, but the increased uptake at school enabled many more children to be screened. After treatment, a positive outcome in the worse seeing eye was achieved in 18 of 42 children (43%) of the pre-school group and in 41 of 84 children (49%) of the school group. Conclusion: Our study suggests that it may be better to screen children at school because it is much easier to achieve coverage of the population. Visual outcome at age 8 years appears to be similar in children screened at pre-school age and those screened at school.https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/22Pre-schoolSchoolVisual defectsVisual outcomeVisual screening
spellingShingle Carol Y. Buckley
Allyson M. Perkins
A comparison of visual outcomes at age 8 years in children detected by pre-school screening with those detected at reception screening
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
Pre-school
School
Visual defects
Visual outcome
Visual screening
title A comparison of visual outcomes at age 8 years in children detected by pre-school screening with those detected at reception screening
title_full A comparison of visual outcomes at age 8 years in children detected by pre-school screening with those detected at reception screening
title_fullStr A comparison of visual outcomes at age 8 years in children detected by pre-school screening with those detected at reception screening
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of visual outcomes at age 8 years in children detected by pre-school screening with those detected at reception screening
title_short A comparison of visual outcomes at age 8 years in children detected by pre-school screening with those detected at reception screening
title_sort comparison of visual outcomes at age 8 years in children detected by pre school screening with those detected at reception screening
topic Pre-school
School
Visual defects
Visual outcome
Visual screening
url https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/22
work_keys_str_mv AT carolybuckley acomparisonofvisualoutcomesatage8yearsinchildrendetectedbypreschoolscreeningwiththosedetectedatreceptionscreening
AT allysonmperkins acomparisonofvisualoutcomesatage8yearsinchildrendetectedbypreschoolscreeningwiththosedetectedatreceptionscreening
AT carolybuckley comparisonofvisualoutcomesatage8yearsinchildrendetectedbypreschoolscreeningwiththosedetectedatreceptionscreening
AT allysonmperkins comparisonofvisualoutcomesatage8yearsinchildrendetectedbypreschoolscreeningwiththosedetectedatreceptionscreening