The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network

Mobile traffic volumes have grown exponentially because of the increase in services and applications. Traditional networks are complex to manage because the forwarding, control, and management planes are all bundled together and, thus, administrators are supposed to deploy high-level policies, as ea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zahraa Zakariya Saleh, Qahhar Muhammad Qadir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Univeristy of Kurdistan Hewler 2020-12-01
Series:UKH Journal of Science and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.ukh.edu.krd/index.php/ukhjse/article/view/237
_version_ 1818454921583788032
author Zahraa Zakariya Saleh
Qahhar Muhammad Qadir
author_facet Zahraa Zakariya Saleh
Qahhar Muhammad Qadir
author_sort Zahraa Zakariya Saleh
collection DOAJ
description Mobile traffic volumes have grown exponentially because of the increase in services and applications. Traditional networks are complex to manage because the forwarding, control, and management planes are all bundled together and, thus, administrators are supposed to deploy high-level policies, as each vendor has its own configuration methods. Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is considered the future paradigm of communication networks. It decouples control logic from its underlying hardware, thereby promoting logically centralized network control and making the network more programmable and easy to configure. Low-power wireless technologies are moving toward a multitenant and multiapplication Internet of Things (IoT), which requires an architecture with scalable, reliable, and configured solutions. However, employing an SDN-based centralized architecture in the environment of a low-power wireless IoT network introduces significant challenges, such as difficult-to-control traffic, unreliable links, network contention, and high associated overheads that can significantly affect the performance of the network. This paper is a contribution toward a performance evaluation for the use of SDN in wireless networking by evaluating the latency, packet drop ratio (PDR), data extraction rate (DER), and overheads. The results show that SDN adds a high percentage of overheads to the network, which is about 43% of the 57% user packets, and the DER drops when the number of mesh nodes are increased, in addition to the high loss that was observed for packets that traveled over more hops.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T22:02:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cfe53271d4ce4d2d9bc4a72c436d22a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2520-7792
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T22:02:34Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Univeristy of Kurdistan Hewler
record_format Article
series UKH Journal of Science and Engineering
spelling doaj.art-cfe53271d4ce4d2d9bc4a72c436d22a52022-12-21T22:45:56ZengUniveristy of Kurdistan HewlerUKH Journal of Science and Engineering2520-77922020-12-014714715610.25079/ukhjse.v4n2y2020.pp147-156The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless NetworkZahraa Zakariya Saleh0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9547-5329Qahhar Muhammad Qadir1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-8712Department of English, College of Education and Language, Lebanese French University, Erbil 44001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Salahaddin University - Erbil, Erbil 44001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. and Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Science and Engineering, University of Kurdistan Hewler, Erbil 44001, Kurdistan Region, IraqMobile traffic volumes have grown exponentially because of the increase in services and applications. Traditional networks are complex to manage because the forwarding, control, and management planes are all bundled together and, thus, administrators are supposed to deploy high-level policies, as each vendor has its own configuration methods. Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is considered the future paradigm of communication networks. It decouples control logic from its underlying hardware, thereby promoting logically centralized network control and making the network more programmable and easy to configure. Low-power wireless technologies are moving toward a multitenant and multiapplication Internet of Things (IoT), which requires an architecture with scalable, reliable, and configured solutions. However, employing an SDN-based centralized architecture in the environment of a low-power wireless IoT network introduces significant challenges, such as difficult-to-control traffic, unreliable links, network contention, and high associated overheads that can significantly affect the performance of the network. This paper is a contribution toward a performance evaluation for the use of SDN in wireless networking by evaluating the latency, packet drop ratio (PDR), data extraction rate (DER), and overheads. The results show that SDN adds a high percentage of overheads to the network, which is about 43% of the 57% user packets, and the DER drops when the number of mesh nodes are increased, in addition to the high loss that was observed for packets that traveled over more hops.https://journals.ukh.edu.krd/index.php/ukhjse/article/view/237sdnsoftware defined networkcsmawsniot
spellingShingle Zahraa Zakariya Saleh
Qahhar Muhammad Qadir
The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network
UKH Journal of Science and Engineering
sdn
software defined network
csma
wsn
iot
title The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network
title_full The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network
title_fullStr The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network
title_full_unstemmed The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network
title_short The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network
title_sort downside of software defined networking in wireless network
topic sdn
software defined network
csma
wsn
iot
url https://journals.ukh.edu.krd/index.php/ukhjse/article/view/237
work_keys_str_mv AT zahraazakariyasaleh thedownsideofsoftwaredefinednetworkinginwirelessnetwork
AT qahharmuhammadqadir thedownsideofsoftwaredefinednetworkinginwirelessnetwork
AT zahraazakariyasaleh downsideofsoftwaredefinednetworkinginwirelessnetwork
AT qahharmuhammadqadir downsideofsoftwaredefinednetworkinginwirelessnetwork