The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network
Mobile traffic volumes have grown exponentially because of the increase in services and applications. Traditional networks are complex to manage because the forwarding, control, and management planes are all bundled together and, thus, administrators are supposed to deploy high-level policies, as ea...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Univeristy of Kurdistan Hewler
2020-12-01
|
Series: | UKH Journal of Science and Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.ukh.edu.krd/index.php/ukhjse/article/view/237 |
_version_ | 1818454921583788032 |
---|---|
author | Zahraa Zakariya Saleh Qahhar Muhammad Qadir |
author_facet | Zahraa Zakariya Saleh Qahhar Muhammad Qadir |
author_sort | Zahraa Zakariya Saleh |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Mobile traffic volumes have grown exponentially because of the increase in services and applications. Traditional networks are complex to manage because the forwarding, control, and management planes are all bundled together and, thus, administrators are supposed to deploy high-level policies, as each vendor has its own configuration methods. Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is considered the future paradigm of communication networks. It decouples control logic from its underlying hardware, thereby promoting logically centralized network control and making the network more programmable and easy to configure. Low-power wireless technologies are moving toward a multitenant and multiapplication Internet of Things (IoT), which requires an architecture with scalable, reliable, and configured solutions. However, employing an SDN-based centralized architecture in the environment of a low-power wireless IoT network introduces significant challenges, such as difficult-to-control traffic, unreliable links, network contention, and high associated overheads that can significantly affect the performance of the network. This paper is a contribution toward a performance evaluation for the use of SDN in wireless networking by evaluating the latency, packet drop ratio (PDR), data extraction rate (DER), and overheads. The results show that SDN adds a high percentage of overheads to the network, which is about 43% of the 57% user packets, and the DER drops when the number of mesh nodes are increased, in addition to the high loss that was observed for packets that traveled over more hops. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T22:02:34Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-cfe53271d4ce4d2d9bc4a72c436d22a5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2520-7792 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T22:02:34Z |
publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
publisher | Univeristy of Kurdistan Hewler |
record_format | Article |
series | UKH Journal of Science and Engineering |
spelling | doaj.art-cfe53271d4ce4d2d9bc4a72c436d22a52022-12-21T22:45:56ZengUniveristy of Kurdistan HewlerUKH Journal of Science and Engineering2520-77922020-12-014714715610.25079/ukhjse.v4n2y2020.pp147-156The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless NetworkZahraa Zakariya Saleh0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9547-5329Qahhar Muhammad Qadir1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-8712Department of English, College of Education and Language, Lebanese French University, Erbil 44001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Salahaddin University - Erbil, Erbil 44001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. and Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Science and Engineering, University of Kurdistan Hewler, Erbil 44001, Kurdistan Region, IraqMobile traffic volumes have grown exponentially because of the increase in services and applications. Traditional networks are complex to manage because the forwarding, control, and management planes are all bundled together and, thus, administrators are supposed to deploy high-level policies, as each vendor has its own configuration methods. Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is considered the future paradigm of communication networks. It decouples control logic from its underlying hardware, thereby promoting logically centralized network control and making the network more programmable and easy to configure. Low-power wireless technologies are moving toward a multitenant and multiapplication Internet of Things (IoT), which requires an architecture with scalable, reliable, and configured solutions. However, employing an SDN-based centralized architecture in the environment of a low-power wireless IoT network introduces significant challenges, such as difficult-to-control traffic, unreliable links, network contention, and high associated overheads that can significantly affect the performance of the network. This paper is a contribution toward a performance evaluation for the use of SDN in wireless networking by evaluating the latency, packet drop ratio (PDR), data extraction rate (DER), and overheads. The results show that SDN adds a high percentage of overheads to the network, which is about 43% of the 57% user packets, and the DER drops when the number of mesh nodes are increased, in addition to the high loss that was observed for packets that traveled over more hops.https://journals.ukh.edu.krd/index.php/ukhjse/article/view/237sdnsoftware defined networkcsmawsniot |
spellingShingle | Zahraa Zakariya Saleh Qahhar Muhammad Qadir The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network UKH Journal of Science and Engineering sdn software defined network csma wsn iot |
title | The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network |
title_full | The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network |
title_fullStr | The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network |
title_full_unstemmed | The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network |
title_short | The Downside of Software-Defined Networking in Wireless Network |
title_sort | downside of software defined networking in wireless network |
topic | sdn software defined network csma wsn iot |
url | https://journals.ukh.edu.krd/index.php/ukhjse/article/view/237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zahraazakariyasaleh thedownsideofsoftwaredefinednetworkinginwirelessnetwork AT qahharmuhammadqadir thedownsideofsoftwaredefinednetworkinginwirelessnetwork AT zahraazakariyasaleh downsideofsoftwaredefinednetworkinginwirelessnetwork AT qahharmuhammadqadir downsideofsoftwaredefinednetworkinginwirelessnetwork |