Behavioral Attributes of Social Groups Determine the Strength and Direction of Selection on Neural Investment
The evolution of social systems can place novel selective forces on investment in expensive neural tissue by changing cognitive demands. Previous hypotheses about the impact of sociality on neural investment have received equivocal support when tested across diverse taxonomic groups and social struc...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.733228/full |
_version_ | 1818344871475281920 |
---|---|
author | Virginia Caponera Leticia Avilés Meghan Barrett Sean O’Donnell Sean O’Donnell |
author_facet | Virginia Caponera Leticia Avilés Meghan Barrett Sean O’Donnell Sean O’Donnell |
author_sort | Virginia Caponera |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The evolution of social systems can place novel selective forces on investment in expensive neural tissue by changing cognitive demands. Previous hypotheses about the impact of sociality on neural investment have received equivocal support when tested across diverse taxonomic groups and social structures. We suggest previous models for social behavior-brain relationships have overlooked important variation in social groups. Social groups vary significantly in structure and function, and the specific attributes of a social group may be more relevant to setting cognitive demands than sociality in general. We have identified intragroup competition, relationship differentiation, information sharing, dominance hierarchies, and task specialization and redundancy as attributes of social behavior which may impact selection for neural investment, and outline how variation in these attributes can result in increased or decreased neural investment with transitions to sociality in different taxa. Finally, we test some of the predictions generated using this framework in a phylogenetic comparison of neural tissue investment in Anelosimus social spiders. Social Anelosimus spiders engage in cooperative prey capture and brood care, which allows for individual redundancy in the completion of these tasks. We hypothesized that in social spider species, the presence of redundancy would reduce selection for individual neural investment relative to subsocial species. We found that social species had significantly decreased investment in the arcuate body, the cognitive center of the spider brain, supporting our predictions. Future comparative tests of brain evolution in social species should account for the special behavioral characteristics that accompany social groups in the subject taxa. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-13T16:53:22Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-cff19717b5d34280b69c07c0a1ac8b12 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2296-701X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-13T16:53:22Z |
publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution |
spelling | doaj.art-cff19717b5d34280b69c07c0a1ac8b122022-12-21T23:37:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2021-11-01910.3389/fevo.2021.733228733228Behavioral Attributes of Social Groups Determine the Strength and Direction of Selection on Neural InvestmentVirginia Caponera0Leticia Avilés1Meghan Barrett2Sean O’Donnell3Sean O’Donnell4Department of Biodiversity, Earth, and Environmental Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United StatesDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaDepartment of Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United StatesDepartment of Biodiversity, Earth, and Environmental Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United StatesDepartment of Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United StatesThe evolution of social systems can place novel selective forces on investment in expensive neural tissue by changing cognitive demands. Previous hypotheses about the impact of sociality on neural investment have received equivocal support when tested across diverse taxonomic groups and social structures. We suggest previous models for social behavior-brain relationships have overlooked important variation in social groups. Social groups vary significantly in structure and function, and the specific attributes of a social group may be more relevant to setting cognitive demands than sociality in general. We have identified intragroup competition, relationship differentiation, information sharing, dominance hierarchies, and task specialization and redundancy as attributes of social behavior which may impact selection for neural investment, and outline how variation in these attributes can result in increased or decreased neural investment with transitions to sociality in different taxa. Finally, we test some of the predictions generated using this framework in a phylogenetic comparison of neural tissue investment in Anelosimus social spiders. Social Anelosimus spiders engage in cooperative prey capture and brood care, which allows for individual redundancy in the completion of these tasks. We hypothesized that in social spider species, the presence of redundancy would reduce selection for individual neural investment relative to subsocial species. We found that social species had significantly decreased investment in the arcuate body, the cognitive center of the spider brain, supporting our predictions. Future comparative tests of brain evolution in social species should account for the special behavioral characteristics that accompany social groups in the subject taxa.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.733228/fullneuroecologysocial behaviorsocial brain evolutionsocial spidersdistributed cognition hypothesis |
spellingShingle | Virginia Caponera Leticia Avilés Meghan Barrett Sean O’Donnell Sean O’Donnell Behavioral Attributes of Social Groups Determine the Strength and Direction of Selection on Neural Investment Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution neuroecology social behavior social brain evolution social spiders distributed cognition hypothesis |
title | Behavioral Attributes of Social Groups Determine the Strength and Direction of Selection on Neural Investment |
title_full | Behavioral Attributes of Social Groups Determine the Strength and Direction of Selection on Neural Investment |
title_fullStr | Behavioral Attributes of Social Groups Determine the Strength and Direction of Selection on Neural Investment |
title_full_unstemmed | Behavioral Attributes of Social Groups Determine the Strength and Direction of Selection on Neural Investment |
title_short | Behavioral Attributes of Social Groups Determine the Strength and Direction of Selection on Neural Investment |
title_sort | behavioral attributes of social groups determine the strength and direction of selection on neural investment |
topic | neuroecology social behavior social brain evolution social spiders distributed cognition hypothesis |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.733228/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT virginiacaponera behavioralattributesofsocialgroupsdeterminethestrengthanddirectionofselectiononneuralinvestment AT leticiaaviles behavioralattributesofsocialgroupsdeterminethestrengthanddirectionofselectiononneuralinvestment AT meghanbarrett behavioralattributesofsocialgroupsdeterminethestrengthanddirectionofselectiononneuralinvestment AT seanodonnell behavioralattributesofsocialgroupsdeterminethestrengthanddirectionofselectiononneuralinvestment AT seanodonnell behavioralattributesofsocialgroupsdeterminethestrengthanddirectionofselectiononneuralinvestment |