LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY?

Goal-free is a learning strategy to present a problem without specific questions, in contrary to a goal-given problem. This research examined the goal-free effects during mathematics collaborative learning measured by cognitive load ratings and transfer performance. An experiment was conducted in au...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sugiman Sugiman, Endah Retnowati, Paul Ayres, Murdanu Murdanu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta 2019-10-01
Series:Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/26914
_version_ 1818335240470396928
author Sugiman Sugiman
Endah Retnowati
Paul Ayres
Murdanu Murdanu
author_facet Sugiman Sugiman
Endah Retnowati
Paul Ayres
Murdanu Murdanu
author_sort Sugiman Sugiman
collection DOAJ
description Goal-free is a learning strategy to present a problem without specific questions, in contrary to a goal-given problem. This research examined the goal-free effects during mathematics collaborative learning measured by cognitive load ratings and transfer performance. An experiment was conducted in authentic mathematics classrooms employing a factorial design with 2 problem presentations (goal-free vs. goal-given problems) ´ 2 learning environments (collaboratively vs. individually) using a Geometry topic. This consisted of four consecutive phases: introductory, acquisition, near and far transfer tests. 111 seventh graders (Average: 12.8 y.o.) who were novices, participated voluntary. The findings showed that students who learned by goal-free problems had significantly higher far-transfer scores than when the goal was given. Interestingly, in the acquisition phase, the students in goal-free problems experienced significantly higher cognitive load than their counterparts. Further, it was found that overall, individuals scored significantly higher in a far-transfer test than those who learned collaboratively; however, during the acquisition phase individuals experienced significantly higher cognitive load than collaborative learning. No pattern of interaction effects was indicated. Overall, it was concluded that goal-free problems may be learned either collaborativelly or individually. Nevertheless, the goal-free problems stimulated higher cognitive load during learning, which seemed to have a positive influence.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T14:20:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cff648b5c2ab464084c0c366deba6730
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0216-1370
2442-8620
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T14:20:17Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
record_format Article
series Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan
spelling doaj.art-cff648b5c2ab464084c0c366deba67302022-12-21T23:42:06ZengUniversitas Negeri YogyakartaCakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan0216-13702442-86202019-10-0138359060010.21831/cp.v38i3.2691412206LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY?Sugiman Sugiman0Endah Retnowati1Paul Ayres2Murdanu Murdanu3(Scopus ID: 57204035834) Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri YogyakartaUniversitas Negeri YogyakartaUniversity of New South WalesUniversitas Negeri YogyakartaGoal-free is a learning strategy to present a problem without specific questions, in contrary to a goal-given problem. This research examined the goal-free effects during mathematics collaborative learning measured by cognitive load ratings and transfer performance. An experiment was conducted in authentic mathematics classrooms employing a factorial design with 2 problem presentations (goal-free vs. goal-given problems) ´ 2 learning environments (collaboratively vs. individually) using a Geometry topic. This consisted of four consecutive phases: introductory, acquisition, near and far transfer tests. 111 seventh graders (Average: 12.8 y.o.) who were novices, participated voluntary. The findings showed that students who learned by goal-free problems had significantly higher far-transfer scores than when the goal was given. Interestingly, in the acquisition phase, the students in goal-free problems experienced significantly higher cognitive load than their counterparts. Further, it was found that overall, individuals scored significantly higher in a far-transfer test than those who learned collaboratively; however, during the acquisition phase individuals experienced significantly higher cognitive load than collaborative learning. No pattern of interaction effects was indicated. Overall, it was concluded that goal-free problems may be learned either collaborativelly or individually. Nevertheless, the goal-free problems stimulated higher cognitive load during learning, which seemed to have a positive influence.https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/26914goal-free problemscognitive loadcollaborativemathematics
spellingShingle Sugiman Sugiman
Endah Retnowati
Paul Ayres
Murdanu Murdanu
LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY?
Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan
goal-free problems
cognitive load
collaborative
mathematics
title LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY?
title_full LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY?
title_fullStr LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY?
title_full_unstemmed LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY?
title_short LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY?
title_sort learning goal free problems collaboratively or individually
topic goal-free problems
cognitive load
collaborative
mathematics
url https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/26914
work_keys_str_mv AT sugimansugiman learninggoalfreeproblemscollaborativelyorindividually
AT endahretnowati learninggoalfreeproblemscollaborativelyorindividually
AT paulayres learninggoalfreeproblemscollaborativelyorindividually
AT murdanumurdanu learninggoalfreeproblemscollaborativelyorindividually