Comparative Evaluation of Immune Responses and Protection of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Oil-Emulsion Adjuvants in Avian Coronavirus Inactivated Vaccines in Chickens
Efficient vaccines are the main strategy to control the avian coronavirus (AvCoV), although several drawbacks related to traditional attenuated and inactivated vaccines have been reported. These counterpoints highlight the importance of developing new alternative vaccines against AvCoV, especially t...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Vaccines |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/12/1457 |
| _version_ | 1797500066478424064 |
|---|---|
| author | Priscila Diniz Lopes Cintia Hiromi Okino Filipe Santos Fernando Caren Pavani Viviane Casagrande Mariguela Maria de Fátima Silva Montassier Hélio José Montassier |
| author_facet | Priscila Diniz Lopes Cintia Hiromi Okino Filipe Santos Fernando Caren Pavani Viviane Casagrande Mariguela Maria de Fátima Silva Montassier Hélio José Montassier |
| author_sort | Priscila Diniz Lopes |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Efficient vaccines are the main strategy to control the avian coronavirus (AvCoV), although several drawbacks related to traditional attenuated and inactivated vaccines have been reported. These counterpoints highlight the importance of developing new alternative vaccines against AvCoV, especially those able to induce long-lasting immune responses. This study evaluated and compared two inactivated vaccines formulated with AvCoV BR-I variants, one composed of chitosan nanoparticles (AvCoV-CS) and the second by Montanide oily adjuvant (AvCoV-O). Both developed vaccines were administered in a single dose or associated with the traditional Mass attenuated vaccine. The AvCoV-CS vaccine administered alone or associated with the Mass vaccine was able to induce strong humoral and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses and complete protection against IBV virulent infection, wherein single administration was characterized by high IgA antibody levels in the mucosa, whereas when associated with the Mass vaccine, the serum IgG antibody was predominantly observed. On the other hand, single administration of the oily vaccine presented poor humoral and CMI responses and consequently incomplete protection against virulent challenge, but when associated with the Mass vaccine, immune responses were developed, and complete protection against infection was observed. Both of our experimental vaccines were able to induce full protection against virulent IBV challenge. A single dose of AvCoV-CS vaccine was sufficient to achieve complete protection, while AvCoV-O required a previous priming by a Mass strain to complete the protection. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T03:56:31Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-cff7bcf8caef4b6f8321f01ae8ed461d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2076-393X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T03:56:31Z |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Vaccines |
| spelling | doaj.art-cff7bcf8caef4b6f8321f01ae8ed461d2023-11-23T10:54:37ZengMDPI AGVaccines2076-393X2021-12-01912145710.3390/vaccines9121457Comparative Evaluation of Immune Responses and Protection of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Oil-Emulsion Adjuvants in Avian Coronavirus Inactivated Vaccines in ChickensPriscila Diniz Lopes0Cintia Hiromi Okino1Filipe Santos Fernando2Caren Pavani3Viviane Casagrande Mariguela4Maria de Fátima Silva Montassier5Hélio José Montassier6Department of Veterinary Pathology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal 14884-900, BrazilEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), Canchim Farm, São Carlos 13560-970, BrazilDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal 14884-900, BrazilDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal 14884-900, BrazilDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal 14884-900, BrazilDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal 14884-900, BrazilDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal 14884-900, BrazilEfficient vaccines are the main strategy to control the avian coronavirus (AvCoV), although several drawbacks related to traditional attenuated and inactivated vaccines have been reported. These counterpoints highlight the importance of developing new alternative vaccines against AvCoV, especially those able to induce long-lasting immune responses. This study evaluated and compared two inactivated vaccines formulated with AvCoV BR-I variants, one composed of chitosan nanoparticles (AvCoV-CS) and the second by Montanide oily adjuvant (AvCoV-O). Both developed vaccines were administered in a single dose or associated with the traditional Mass attenuated vaccine. The AvCoV-CS vaccine administered alone or associated with the Mass vaccine was able to induce strong humoral and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses and complete protection against IBV virulent infection, wherein single administration was characterized by high IgA antibody levels in the mucosa, whereas when associated with the Mass vaccine, the serum IgG antibody was predominantly observed. On the other hand, single administration of the oily vaccine presented poor humoral and CMI responses and consequently incomplete protection against virulent challenge, but when associated with the Mass vaccine, immune responses were developed, and complete protection against infection was observed. Both of our experimental vaccines were able to induce full protection against virulent IBV challenge. A single dose of AvCoV-CS vaccine was sufficient to achieve complete protection, while AvCoV-O required a previous priming by a Mass strain to complete the protection.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/12/1457avian infectious bronchitiscellular immune responsedelivery carrier-adjuvantmucosal immunizationoil adjuvant |
| spellingShingle | Priscila Diniz Lopes Cintia Hiromi Okino Filipe Santos Fernando Caren Pavani Viviane Casagrande Mariguela Maria de Fátima Silva Montassier Hélio José Montassier Comparative Evaluation of Immune Responses and Protection of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Oil-Emulsion Adjuvants in Avian Coronavirus Inactivated Vaccines in Chickens Vaccines avian infectious bronchitis cellular immune response delivery carrier-adjuvant mucosal immunization oil adjuvant |
| title | Comparative Evaluation of Immune Responses and Protection of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Oil-Emulsion Adjuvants in Avian Coronavirus Inactivated Vaccines in Chickens |
| title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Immune Responses and Protection of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Oil-Emulsion Adjuvants in Avian Coronavirus Inactivated Vaccines in Chickens |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Immune Responses and Protection of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Oil-Emulsion Adjuvants in Avian Coronavirus Inactivated Vaccines in Chickens |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Immune Responses and Protection of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Oil-Emulsion Adjuvants in Avian Coronavirus Inactivated Vaccines in Chickens |
| title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Immune Responses and Protection of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Oil-Emulsion Adjuvants in Avian Coronavirus Inactivated Vaccines in Chickens |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of immune responses and protection of chitosan nanoparticles and oil emulsion adjuvants in avian coronavirus inactivated vaccines in chickens |
| topic | avian infectious bronchitis cellular immune response delivery carrier-adjuvant mucosal immunization oil adjuvant |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/12/1457 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT prisciladinizlopes comparativeevaluationofimmuneresponsesandprotectionofchitosannanoparticlesandoilemulsionadjuvantsinaviancoronavirusinactivatedvaccinesinchickens AT cintiahiromiokino comparativeevaluationofimmuneresponsesandprotectionofchitosannanoparticlesandoilemulsionadjuvantsinaviancoronavirusinactivatedvaccinesinchickens AT filipesantosfernando comparativeevaluationofimmuneresponsesandprotectionofchitosannanoparticlesandoilemulsionadjuvantsinaviancoronavirusinactivatedvaccinesinchickens AT carenpavani comparativeevaluationofimmuneresponsesandprotectionofchitosannanoparticlesandoilemulsionadjuvantsinaviancoronavirusinactivatedvaccinesinchickens AT vivianecasagrandemariguela comparativeevaluationofimmuneresponsesandprotectionofchitosannanoparticlesandoilemulsionadjuvantsinaviancoronavirusinactivatedvaccinesinchickens AT mariadefatimasilvamontassier comparativeevaluationofimmuneresponsesandprotectionofchitosannanoparticlesandoilemulsionadjuvantsinaviancoronavirusinactivatedvaccinesinchickens AT heliojosemontassier comparativeevaluationofimmuneresponsesandprotectionofchitosannanoparticlesandoilemulsionadjuvantsinaviancoronavirusinactivatedvaccinesinchickens |