Combined test versus logrank/Cox test in 50 randomised trials
Abstract Background The logrank test and the Cox proportional hazards model are routinely applied in the design and analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with time-to-event outcomes. Usually, sample size and power calculations assume proportional hazards (PH) of the treatment effect, i.e....
Main Authors: | Patrick Royston, Babak Choodari-Oskooei, Mahesh K. B. Parmar, Jennifer K. Rogers |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3251-5 |
Similar Items
-
Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated
by: Patrick Royston, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01) -
A simulation study comparing the power of nine tests of the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials with a time-to-event outcome
by: Patrick Royston, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Combined test versus logrank/Cox test in 50 randomised trials
by: Royston, P, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Exact and Asymptotic Weighted Logrank Tests for Interval Censored Data: The interval R Package
by: Michael P. Fay, et al.
Published: (2010-10-01) -
Testing and interpreting assumptions of COX regression analysis
by: Sampada Dessai, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)