A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis

When the Expanded Programme on Immunization was established and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) was introduced for developing countries to use exclusively, national leaders of public health had no opportunity to make an informed choice between OPV and the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). Today, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: T. Jacob John
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The World Health Organization
Series:Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862004000100011&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1827334733221068800
author T. Jacob John
author_facet T. Jacob John
author_sort T. Jacob John
collection DOAJ
description When the Expanded Programme on Immunization was established and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) was introduced for developing countries to use exclusively, national leaders of public health had no opportunity to make an informed choice between OPV and the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). Today, as progress is made towards the goal of global eradication of poliomyelitis attributable to wild polioviruses, all developing countries where OPV is used face the risk of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP). Until recently, awareness of VAPP has been poor and quantitative risk analysis scanty but it is now well known that the continued use of OPV perpetuates the risk of VAPP. Discontinuation or declining immunization coverage of OPV will increase the risk of emergence of circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPV) that re-acquire wild virus-like properties and may cause outbreaks of polio. To eliminate the risk of cVDPV, either very high immunization coverage must be maintained as long as OPV is in use, or IPV should replace OPV. Stopping OPV without first achieving high immunization coverage with IPV is unwise on account of the possibility of emergence of cVDPV. Increasing numbers of developed nations prefer IPV, and manufacturing capacities have not been scaled up, so its price remains prohibitively high and unaffordable by developing countries, where, in addition, large-scale field experience with IPV is lacking. Under these circumstances, a policy shift to increase the use of IPV in national immunization programmes in developing countries is a necessary first step; once IPV coverage reaches high levels (over 85%), the withdrawal of OPV may begin.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T18:02:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-cffa6e2feccb4c939ddd09ae18f116be
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0042-9686
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T18:02:01Z
publisher The World Health Organization
record_format Article
series Bulletin of the World Health Organization
spelling doaj.art-cffa6e2feccb4c939ddd09ae18f116be2024-03-02T10:39:54ZengThe World Health OrganizationBulletin of the World Health Organization0042-9686821535710.1590/S0042-96862004000100011S0042-96862004000100011A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitisT. Jacob John0Kerala State Institute of Virology and Infectious DiseasesWhen the Expanded Programme on Immunization was established and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) was introduced for developing countries to use exclusively, national leaders of public health had no opportunity to make an informed choice between OPV and the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). Today, as progress is made towards the goal of global eradication of poliomyelitis attributable to wild polioviruses, all developing countries where OPV is used face the risk of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP). Until recently, awareness of VAPP has been poor and quantitative risk analysis scanty but it is now well known that the continued use of OPV perpetuates the risk of VAPP. Discontinuation or declining immunization coverage of OPV will increase the risk of emergence of circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPV) that re-acquire wild virus-like properties and may cause outbreaks of polio. To eliminate the risk of cVDPV, either very high immunization coverage must be maintained as long as OPV is in use, or IPV should replace OPV. Stopping OPV without first achieving high immunization coverage with IPV is unwise on account of the possibility of emergence of cVDPV. Increasing numbers of developed nations prefer IPV, and manufacturing capacities have not been scaled up, so its price remains prohibitively high and unaffordable by developing countries, where, in addition, large-scale field experience with IPV is lacking. Under these circumstances, a policy shift to increase the use of IPV in national immunization programmes in developing countries is a necessary first step; once IPV coverage reaches high levels (over 85%), the withdrawal of OPV may begin.http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862004000100011&lng=en&tlng=envacuna antipolio oralpoliomielitispoliomielitisvacuna antipolio de virus inactivadosvacuna antipolio de virus inactivadospoliovirusprogramas de inmunizaciónpaíses en desarrollo
spellingShingle T. Jacob John
A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
vacuna antipolio oral
poliomielitis
poliomielitis
vacuna antipolio de virus inactivados
vacuna antipolio de virus inactivados
poliovirus
programas de inmunización
países en desarrollo
title A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
title_full A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
title_fullStr A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
title_full_unstemmed A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
title_short A developing country perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
title_sort developing country perspective on vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis
topic vacuna antipolio oral
poliomielitis
poliomielitis
vacuna antipolio de virus inactivados
vacuna antipolio de virus inactivados
poliovirus
programas de inmunización
países en desarrollo
url http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862004000100011&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT tjacobjohn adevelopingcountryperspectiveonvaccineassociatedparalyticpoliomyelitis
AT tjacobjohn developingcountryperspectiveonvaccineassociatedparalyticpoliomyelitis