Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND:Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol are well established in many surgical disciplines, leading to decrease in morbidity and length of hospital stay. These multi-modal protocols have been also introduced to oesophageal cancer surgery. This review aimed to evaluate current liter...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5370110?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1828885248094502912 |
|---|---|
| author | Magdalena Pisarska Piotr Małczak Piotr Major Michał Wysocki Andrzej Budzyński Michał Pędziwiatr |
| author_facet | Magdalena Pisarska Piotr Małczak Piotr Major Michał Wysocki Andrzej Budzyński Michał Pędziwiatr |
| author_sort | Magdalena Pisarska |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | BACKGROUND:Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol are well established in many surgical disciplines, leading to decrease in morbidity and length of hospital stay. These multi-modal protocols have been also introduced to oesophageal cancer surgery. This review aimed to evaluate current literature on ERAS in oesophageal cancer surgery and conduct a meta-analysis on primary and secondary outcomes. METHODS:MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. We analyzed data up to May 2016. Eligible studies had to contain four described ERAS protocol elements. The primary outcome was overall morbidity. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, specific complications, mortality and readmissions. Random effect meta-analyses were undertaken. RESULTS:Initial search yielded 1,064 articles. Thorough evaluation resulted in 13 eligible articles which were analyzed. A total of 2,042 patients were included in the analysis (1,058 ERAS group and 984 treated with traditional protocols). Analysis of overall morbidity as well as complication rate did not show any significant reduction. Non-surgical complications and pulmonary complications were significantly lower in the ERAS group, RR = 0.71 95% CI 0.62-0.80, p < 0.00001 and RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94, p = 0.01, respectively. Meta-analysis on length of stay presented significant reduction Mean difference = -3.55, 95% CI -4.41 to -2.69, p for effect<0.00001. CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review with a meta-analysis on ERAS in oesophageal surgery indicates a reduction of non-surgical complications and no negative influence on overall morbidity. Moreover, a reduction in the length of hospital stay was presented. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T11:23:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d00883f148854fddb0cd73ac496d60bb |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T11:23:04Z |
| publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-d00883f148854fddb0cd73ac496d60bb2022-12-21T23:48:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01123e017438210.1371/journal.pone.0174382Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Magdalena PisarskaPiotr MałczakPiotr MajorMichał WysockiAndrzej BudzyńskiMichał PędziwiatrBACKGROUND:Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol are well established in many surgical disciplines, leading to decrease in morbidity and length of hospital stay. These multi-modal protocols have been also introduced to oesophageal cancer surgery. This review aimed to evaluate current literature on ERAS in oesophageal cancer surgery and conduct a meta-analysis on primary and secondary outcomes. METHODS:MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. We analyzed data up to May 2016. Eligible studies had to contain four described ERAS protocol elements. The primary outcome was overall morbidity. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, specific complications, mortality and readmissions. Random effect meta-analyses were undertaken. RESULTS:Initial search yielded 1,064 articles. Thorough evaluation resulted in 13 eligible articles which were analyzed. A total of 2,042 patients were included in the analysis (1,058 ERAS group and 984 treated with traditional protocols). Analysis of overall morbidity as well as complication rate did not show any significant reduction. Non-surgical complications and pulmonary complications were significantly lower in the ERAS group, RR = 0.71 95% CI 0.62-0.80, p < 0.00001 and RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94, p = 0.01, respectively. Meta-analysis on length of stay presented significant reduction Mean difference = -3.55, 95% CI -4.41 to -2.69, p for effect<0.00001. CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review with a meta-analysis on ERAS in oesophageal surgery indicates a reduction of non-surgical complications and no negative influence on overall morbidity. Moreover, a reduction in the length of hospital stay was presented.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5370110?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Magdalena Pisarska Piotr Małczak Piotr Major Michał Wysocki Andrzej Budzyński Michał Pędziwiatr Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE |
| title | Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| title_full | Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| title_fullStr | Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| title_short | Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. |
| title_sort | enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery systematic review and meta analysis |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5370110?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT magdalenapisarska enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinoesophagealcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT piotrmałczak enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinoesophagealcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT piotrmajor enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinoesophagealcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT michałwysocki enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinoesophagealcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT andrzejbudzynski enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinoesophagealcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT michałpedziwiatr enhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolinoesophagealcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |