Learning from microarray interlaboratory studies: measures of precision for gene expression
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The ability to demonstrate the reproducibility of gene expression microarray results is a critical consideration for the use of microarray technology in clinical applications. While studies have asserted that microarray data can be &...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2009-04-01
|
| Series: | BMC Genomics |
| Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/10/153 |
| _version_ | 1811286639094267904 |
|---|---|
| author | Reid Laura H Jones Wendell D Duewer David L Salit Marc |
| author_facet | Reid Laura H Jones Wendell D Duewer David L Salit Marc |
| author_sort | Reid Laura H |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The ability to demonstrate the reproducibility of gene expression microarray results is a critical consideration for the use of microarray technology in clinical applications. While studies have asserted that microarray data can be "highly reproducible" under given conditions, there is little ability to quantitatively compare amongst the various metrics and terminology used to characterize and express measurement performance. Use of standardized conceptual tools can greatly facilitate communication among the user, developer, and regulator stakeholders of the microarray community. While shaped by less highly multiplexed systems, measurement science (metrology) is devoted to establishing a coherent and internationally recognized vocabulary and quantitative practice for the characterization of measurement processes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The two independent aspects of the metrological concept of "accuracy" are "trueness" (closeness of a measurement to an accepted reference value) and "precision" (the closeness of measurement results to each other). A carefully designed collaborative study enables estimation of a variety of gene expression measurement precision metrics: repeatability, several flavors of intermediate precision, and reproducibility. The three 2004 Expression Analysis Pilot Proficiency Test collaborative studies, each with 13 to 16 participants, provide triplicate microarray measurements on each of two reference RNA pools. Using and modestly extending the consensus ISO 5725 documentary standard, we evaluate the metrological precision figures of merit for individual microarray signal measurement, building from calculations appropriate to single measurement processes, such as technical replicate expression values for individual probes on a microarray, to the estimation and display of precision functions representing all of the probes in a given platform.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>With only modest extensions, the established metrological framework can be fruitfully used to characterize the measurement performance of microarray and other highly multiplexed systems. Precision functions, summarizing routine precision metrics estimated from appropriately repeated measurements of one or more reference materials as functions of signal level, are demonstrated and merit further development for characterizing measurement platforms, monitoring changes in measurement system performance, and comparing performance among laboratories or analysts.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T03:04:35Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d008efe3906347aea31e60db54999554 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2164 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T03:04:35Z |
| publishDate | 2009-04-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Genomics |
| spelling | doaj.art-d008efe3906347aea31e60db549995542022-12-22T03:05:19ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642009-04-0110115310.1186/1471-2164-10-153Learning from microarray interlaboratory studies: measures of precision for gene expressionReid Laura HJones Wendell DDuewer David LSalit Marc<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The ability to demonstrate the reproducibility of gene expression microarray results is a critical consideration for the use of microarray technology in clinical applications. While studies have asserted that microarray data can be "highly reproducible" under given conditions, there is little ability to quantitatively compare amongst the various metrics and terminology used to characterize and express measurement performance. Use of standardized conceptual tools can greatly facilitate communication among the user, developer, and regulator stakeholders of the microarray community. While shaped by less highly multiplexed systems, measurement science (metrology) is devoted to establishing a coherent and internationally recognized vocabulary and quantitative practice for the characterization of measurement processes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The two independent aspects of the metrological concept of "accuracy" are "trueness" (closeness of a measurement to an accepted reference value) and "precision" (the closeness of measurement results to each other). A carefully designed collaborative study enables estimation of a variety of gene expression measurement precision metrics: repeatability, several flavors of intermediate precision, and reproducibility. The three 2004 Expression Analysis Pilot Proficiency Test collaborative studies, each with 13 to 16 participants, provide triplicate microarray measurements on each of two reference RNA pools. Using and modestly extending the consensus ISO 5725 documentary standard, we evaluate the metrological precision figures of merit for individual microarray signal measurement, building from calculations appropriate to single measurement processes, such as technical replicate expression values for individual probes on a microarray, to the estimation and display of precision functions representing all of the probes in a given platform.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>With only modest extensions, the established metrological framework can be fruitfully used to characterize the measurement performance of microarray and other highly multiplexed systems. Precision functions, summarizing routine precision metrics estimated from appropriately repeated measurements of one or more reference materials as functions of signal level, are demonstrated and merit further development for characterizing measurement platforms, monitoring changes in measurement system performance, and comparing performance among laboratories or analysts.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/10/153 |
| spellingShingle | Reid Laura H Jones Wendell D Duewer David L Salit Marc Learning from microarray interlaboratory studies: measures of precision for gene expression BMC Genomics |
| title | Learning from microarray interlaboratory studies: measures of precision for gene expression |
| title_full | Learning from microarray interlaboratory studies: measures of precision for gene expression |
| title_fullStr | Learning from microarray interlaboratory studies: measures of precision for gene expression |
| title_full_unstemmed | Learning from microarray interlaboratory studies: measures of precision for gene expression |
| title_short | Learning from microarray interlaboratory studies: measures of precision for gene expression |
| title_sort | learning from microarray interlaboratory studies measures of precision for gene expression |
| url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/10/153 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT reidlaurah learningfrommicroarrayinterlaboratorystudiesmeasuresofprecisionforgeneexpression AT joneswendelld learningfrommicroarrayinterlaboratorystudiesmeasuresofprecisionforgeneexpression AT duewerdavidl learningfrommicroarrayinterlaboratorystudiesmeasuresofprecisionforgeneexpression AT salitmarc learningfrommicroarrayinterlaboratorystudiesmeasuresofprecisionforgeneexpression |