Comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand laceration

Objective: Hand lacerations are among the most frequent causes of visiting emergency departments (EDs). Wound infection is one of its complications. There is still an ongoing disagreement on the administration of oral versus intravenous (IV) antibiotics (ABs). The objective of this study is to compa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehdi Momeni, Elnaz Vahidi, Neda Karimi Tafti, Zeinab Naderpour, Javad Seyedhosseini, Morteza Saeedi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jept.ir/article_92104_e09eb5b705ba3ac217a7b164ac7c3f38.pdf
_version_ 1797828076630966272
author Mehdi Momeni
Elnaz Vahidi
Neda Karimi Tafti
Zeinab Naderpour
Javad Seyedhosseini
Morteza Saeedi
author_facet Mehdi Momeni
Elnaz Vahidi
Neda Karimi Tafti
Zeinab Naderpour
Javad Seyedhosseini
Morteza Saeedi
author_sort Mehdi Momeni
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Hand lacerations are among the most frequent causes of visiting emergency departments (EDs). Wound infection is one of its complications. There is still an ongoing disagreement on the administration of oral versus intravenous (IV) antibiotics (ABs). The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of oral versus IV ABs in preventing wound infection of hand lacerations. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, we enrolled all patients with hand lacerations (based on the inclusion criteria) during 6 months in the EDs of 2 tertiary referral centers. Convenient sampling was done. Finally, in the first group, 382 patients received oral AB (two 500 mg cephalexin capsules) and the other 382 patients in the second group received IV AB (1 gr IV cefazolin) before wound management. Both groups were followed and received oral cephalexin during 48 hours after suturing. Rates of wound infection and different complications were compared between the two groups. T-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi square and Fisher analysis were used. Results: Both groups had the same age and gender distribution rate (79.8% of males with the mean age of 30.8 years in the first group, and 83.5% of males with the mean age of 32.6 years in the second group (P=0.19 and 0.39, respectively). In our study, wound infection developed in 2.6% and 1.8% of patients in the first and second groups, respectively (P=0.46). Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, oral and IV ABs were not significantly different in terms of preventing wound infection.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T12:58:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d00a6571d79c4ee79ff05968aa520070
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2383-4544
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T12:58:35Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma
spelling doaj.art-d00a6571d79c4ee79ff05968aa5200702023-05-13T10:14:25ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesJournal of Emergency Practice and Trauma2383-45442023-01-01911318https://doi.org/10.34172/jept.2022.19Comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand lacerationMehdi Momeni0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7816-8733Elnaz Vahidi1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4580-1456Neda Karimi Tafti2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6056-5041Zeinab Naderpour3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7185-1177Javad Seyedhosseini4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9131-9732 Morteza Saeedi5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8416-6048Emergency Medicine Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranEmergency Medicine Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranEmergency Medicine Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranInternal Medicine Department, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranEmergency Medicine Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranEmergency Medicine Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranObjective: Hand lacerations are among the most frequent causes of visiting emergency departments (EDs). Wound infection is one of its complications. There is still an ongoing disagreement on the administration of oral versus intravenous (IV) antibiotics (ABs). The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of oral versus IV ABs in preventing wound infection of hand lacerations. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, we enrolled all patients with hand lacerations (based on the inclusion criteria) during 6 months in the EDs of 2 tertiary referral centers. Convenient sampling was done. Finally, in the first group, 382 patients received oral AB (two 500 mg cephalexin capsules) and the other 382 patients in the second group received IV AB (1 gr IV cefazolin) before wound management. Both groups were followed and received oral cephalexin during 48 hours after suturing. Rates of wound infection and different complications were compared between the two groups. T-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi square and Fisher analysis were used. Results: Both groups had the same age and gender distribution rate (79.8% of males with the mean age of 30.8 years in the first group, and 83.5% of males with the mean age of 32.6 years in the second group (P=0.19 and 0.39, respectively). In our study, wound infection developed in 2.6% and 1.8% of patients in the first and second groups, respectively (P=0.46). Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, oral and IV ABs were not significantly different in terms of preventing wound infection.http://www.jept.ir/article_92104_e09eb5b705ba3ac217a7b164ac7c3f38.pdfhand lacerationoral antibioticintravenous antibioticwound infection
spellingShingle Mehdi Momeni
Elnaz Vahidi
Neda Karimi Tafti
Zeinab Naderpour
Javad Seyedhosseini
Morteza Saeedi
Comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand laceration
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma
hand laceration
oral antibiotic
intravenous antibiotic
wound infection
title Comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand laceration
title_full Comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand laceration
title_fullStr Comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand laceration
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand laceration
title_short Comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand laceration
title_sort comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand laceration
topic hand laceration
oral antibiotic
intravenous antibiotic
wound infection
url http://www.jept.ir/article_92104_e09eb5b705ba3ac217a7b164ac7c3f38.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mehdimomeni comparingtheeffectivenessoforalversusintravenousantibioticsintheprophylaxisofwoundinfectioninhandlaceration
AT elnazvahidi comparingtheeffectivenessoforalversusintravenousantibioticsintheprophylaxisofwoundinfectioninhandlaceration
AT nedakarimitafti comparingtheeffectivenessoforalversusintravenousantibioticsintheprophylaxisofwoundinfectioninhandlaceration
AT zeinabnaderpour comparingtheeffectivenessoforalversusintravenousantibioticsintheprophylaxisofwoundinfectioninhandlaceration
AT javadseyedhosseini comparingtheeffectivenessoforalversusintravenousantibioticsintheprophylaxisofwoundinfectioninhandlaceration
AT mortezasaeedi comparingtheeffectivenessoforalversusintravenousantibioticsintheprophylaxisofwoundinfectioninhandlaceration