Nonprofit-Public Partnerships for Local Development: Social Inputs in Policy Implementation

This paper analyzes a partnership between a civil society organization and a local government (CPP) for development planning in an emerging democracy. The paper shows that CPPs can promote better policy design and implementation of public policy by benefiting from the strengths of both nonprofits an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natal Alejandro, Brichter William
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2012-06-01
Series:Nonprofit Policy Forum
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1027
_version_ 1819025784372723712
author Natal Alejandro
Brichter William
author_facet Natal Alejandro
Brichter William
author_sort Natal Alejandro
collection DOAJ
description This paper analyzes a partnership between a civil society organization and a local government (CPP) for development planning in an emerging democracy. The paper shows that CPPs can promote better policy design and implementation of public policy by benefiting from the strengths of both nonprofits and government. The paper answers pending questions like, ‘in which contexts are CPPs effective?’, ‘what characteristics of nonprofits improve policy implementation?’; ‘how does the reputation and public trust that local nonprofits enjoy transfer to the partnership?’ and ‘to what extent does non-profit participation create more citizens engagement?’, among others. By answering these questions the paper shows the potential benefits that local government-nonprofits partnerships can bring to the policymaking process, but it also argues that effective CPPs are fraught with challenges. The paper demonstrates the need for more inclusive and identity-sensitive local governance mechanisms, and for institutional arrangements that anticipate conflict and address increasing inequalities and community disengagement. The paper shows that effective governance is a collaborative venture in which social inputs need to be taken into account in program design; and a shared vision of the common good needs to be built-up for policy implementation.By exposing the tensions and conflicts of this governance experiment, the paper draws lessons for nonprofits, governments, and policymakers who seek to participate or design collaborative ventures.The case studied is the program of Pueblos Magicos in Valle de Bravo, Mexico, an instructive object of study, which lessons are not unique to this small town in central Mexico, but common to towns experiencing rapid demographic and economic growth elsewhere.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T05:16:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d01c24bee88743fb9c5f64c4f151c1c8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2154-3348
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T05:16:11Z
publishDate 2012-06-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Nonprofit Policy Forum
spelling doaj.art-d01c24bee88743fb9c5f64c4f151c1c82022-12-21T19:14:55ZengDe GruyterNonprofit Policy Forum2154-33482012-06-013110.1515/2154-3348.1027Nonprofit-Public Partnerships for Local Development: Social Inputs in Policy ImplementationNatal AlejandroBrichter WilliamThis paper analyzes a partnership between a civil society organization and a local government (CPP) for development planning in an emerging democracy. The paper shows that CPPs can promote better policy design and implementation of public policy by benefiting from the strengths of both nonprofits and government. The paper answers pending questions like, ‘in which contexts are CPPs effective?’, ‘what characteristics of nonprofits improve policy implementation?’; ‘how does the reputation and public trust that local nonprofits enjoy transfer to the partnership?’ and ‘to what extent does non-profit participation create more citizens engagement?’, among others. By answering these questions the paper shows the potential benefits that local government-nonprofits partnerships can bring to the policymaking process, but it also argues that effective CPPs are fraught with challenges. The paper demonstrates the need for more inclusive and identity-sensitive local governance mechanisms, and for institutional arrangements that anticipate conflict and address increasing inequalities and community disengagement. The paper shows that effective governance is a collaborative venture in which social inputs need to be taken into account in program design; and a shared vision of the common good needs to be built-up for policy implementation.By exposing the tensions and conflicts of this governance experiment, the paper draws lessons for nonprofits, governments, and policymakers who seek to participate or design collaborative ventures.The case studied is the program of Pueblos Magicos in Valle de Bravo, Mexico, an instructive object of study, which lessons are not unique to this small town in central Mexico, but common to towns experiencing rapid demographic and economic growth elsewhere.https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1027government-nonprofit partnershipslocal developmentcitizen’s participationpolicy implementationsocial inputscivic engagement
spellingShingle Natal Alejandro
Brichter William
Nonprofit-Public Partnerships for Local Development: Social Inputs in Policy Implementation
Nonprofit Policy Forum
government-nonprofit partnerships
local development
citizen’s participation
policy implementation
social inputs
civic engagement
title Nonprofit-Public Partnerships for Local Development: Social Inputs in Policy Implementation
title_full Nonprofit-Public Partnerships for Local Development: Social Inputs in Policy Implementation
title_fullStr Nonprofit-Public Partnerships for Local Development: Social Inputs in Policy Implementation
title_full_unstemmed Nonprofit-Public Partnerships for Local Development: Social Inputs in Policy Implementation
title_short Nonprofit-Public Partnerships for Local Development: Social Inputs in Policy Implementation
title_sort nonprofit public partnerships for local development social inputs in policy implementation
topic government-nonprofit partnerships
local development
citizen’s participation
policy implementation
social inputs
civic engagement
url https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1027
work_keys_str_mv AT natalalejandro nonprofitpublicpartnershipsforlocaldevelopmentsocialinputsinpolicyimplementation
AT brichterwilliam nonprofitpublicpartnershipsforlocaldevelopmentsocialinputsinpolicyimplementation