First do no harm: An exploration of researchers' ethics of conduct in Big Data behavioral studies.

Research ethics has traditionally been guided by well-established documents such as the Belmont Report and the Declaration of Helsinki. At the same time, the introduction of Big Data methods, that is having a great impact in behavioral research, is raising complex ethical issues that make protection...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maddalena Favaretto, Eva De Clercq, Jens Gaab, Bernice Simone Elger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241865
_version_ 1818587996759261184
author Maddalena Favaretto
Eva De Clercq
Jens Gaab
Bernice Simone Elger
author_facet Maddalena Favaretto
Eva De Clercq
Jens Gaab
Bernice Simone Elger
author_sort Maddalena Favaretto
collection DOAJ
description Research ethics has traditionally been guided by well-established documents such as the Belmont Report and the Declaration of Helsinki. At the same time, the introduction of Big Data methods, that is having a great impact in behavioral research, is raising complex ethical issues that make protection of research participants an increasingly difficult challenge. By conducting 39 semi-structured interviews with academic scholars in both Switzerland and United States, our research aims at exploring the code of ethics and research practices of academic scholars involved in Big Data studies in the fields of psychology and sociology to understand if the principles set by the Belmont Report are still considered relevant in Big Data research. Our study shows how scholars generally find traditional principles to be a suitable guide to perform ethical data research but, at the same time, they recognized and elaborated on the challenges embedded in their practical application. In addition, due to the growing introduction of new actors in scholarly research, such as data holders and owners, it was also questioned whether responsibility to protect research participants should fall solely on investigators. In order to appropriately address ethics issues in Big Data research projects, education in ethics, exchange and dialogue between research teams and scholars from different disciplines should be enhanced. In addition, models of consultancy and shared responsibility between investigators, data owners and review boards should be implemented in order to ensure better protection of research participants.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T09:17:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d02e82eb71f444619273e4c1837ddf38
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T09:17:44Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-d02e82eb71f444619273e4c1837ddf382022-12-21T22:36:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011511e024186510.1371/journal.pone.0241865First do no harm: An exploration of researchers' ethics of conduct in Big Data behavioral studies.Maddalena FavarettoEva De ClercqJens GaabBernice Simone ElgerResearch ethics has traditionally been guided by well-established documents such as the Belmont Report and the Declaration of Helsinki. At the same time, the introduction of Big Data methods, that is having a great impact in behavioral research, is raising complex ethical issues that make protection of research participants an increasingly difficult challenge. By conducting 39 semi-structured interviews with academic scholars in both Switzerland and United States, our research aims at exploring the code of ethics and research practices of academic scholars involved in Big Data studies in the fields of psychology and sociology to understand if the principles set by the Belmont Report are still considered relevant in Big Data research. Our study shows how scholars generally find traditional principles to be a suitable guide to perform ethical data research but, at the same time, they recognized and elaborated on the challenges embedded in their practical application. In addition, due to the growing introduction of new actors in scholarly research, such as data holders and owners, it was also questioned whether responsibility to protect research participants should fall solely on investigators. In order to appropriately address ethics issues in Big Data research projects, education in ethics, exchange and dialogue between research teams and scholars from different disciplines should be enhanced. In addition, models of consultancy and shared responsibility between investigators, data owners and review boards should be implemented in order to ensure better protection of research participants.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241865
spellingShingle Maddalena Favaretto
Eva De Clercq
Jens Gaab
Bernice Simone Elger
First do no harm: An exploration of researchers' ethics of conduct in Big Data behavioral studies.
PLoS ONE
title First do no harm: An exploration of researchers' ethics of conduct in Big Data behavioral studies.
title_full First do no harm: An exploration of researchers' ethics of conduct in Big Data behavioral studies.
title_fullStr First do no harm: An exploration of researchers' ethics of conduct in Big Data behavioral studies.
title_full_unstemmed First do no harm: An exploration of researchers' ethics of conduct in Big Data behavioral studies.
title_short First do no harm: An exploration of researchers' ethics of conduct in Big Data behavioral studies.
title_sort first do no harm an exploration of researchers ethics of conduct in big data behavioral studies
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241865
work_keys_str_mv AT maddalenafavaretto firstdonoharmanexplorationofresearchersethicsofconductinbigdatabehavioralstudies
AT evadeclercq firstdonoharmanexplorationofresearchersethicsofconductinbigdatabehavioralstudies
AT jensgaab firstdonoharmanexplorationofresearchersethicsofconductinbigdatabehavioralstudies
AT bernicesimoneelger firstdonoharmanexplorationofresearchersethicsofconductinbigdatabehavioralstudies