The impact of nonresponse in different survey stages on the precision of prevalence estimates for multi-stage survey studies

Abstract Objective While it is known that nonresponse might produce biased results and impair the precision of results in survey research studies, the pattern of the impact on the precision of estimates due to the nonresponse in different survey stages is historically overlooked. Having this type of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ming Ma, Sophie Rosenberg, Alexander M. Kaizer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-11-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05840-0
_version_ 1818851448495013888
author Ming Ma
Sophie Rosenberg
Alexander M. Kaizer
author_facet Ming Ma
Sophie Rosenberg
Alexander M. Kaizer
author_sort Ming Ma
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective While it is known that nonresponse might produce biased results and impair the precision of results in survey research studies, the pattern of the impact on the precision of estimates due to the nonresponse in different survey stages is historically overlooked. Having this type of information is essential when creating recruitment plans. This study proposes to examine and compare the effect of nonresponse in different stages on the precision of prevalence estimates in multi-stage survey studies. Based on data from a state level survey, a simulation approach was used to generate datasets with different nonresponse rates in three stages. The margin of error was then compared between the datasets with nonresponse at three different survey stages for 12 outcomes. Results At the same nonresponse rate, the mean margin of error was greater for the data with nonresponse at higher stages. Additionally, as the nonresponse rate increased, precision was more inflated within the data with higher stage nonresponse. This suggests that the effort used to recruit the primary sampling units is more crucial to improve the precision of estimates in multi-stage survey studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T07:05:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d02fdbc2dd2b426f986f0d7916a7aea0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-0500
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T07:05:11Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Research Notes
spelling doaj.art-d02fdbc2dd2b426f986f0d7916a7aea02022-12-21T20:31:19ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002021-11-011411510.1186/s13104-021-05840-0The impact of nonresponse in different survey stages on the precision of prevalence estimates for multi-stage survey studiesMing Ma0Sophie Rosenberg1Alexander M. Kaizer2Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusCommunity and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusDepartment of Biostatistics & Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAbstract Objective While it is known that nonresponse might produce biased results and impair the precision of results in survey research studies, the pattern of the impact on the precision of estimates due to the nonresponse in different survey stages is historically overlooked. Having this type of information is essential when creating recruitment plans. This study proposes to examine and compare the effect of nonresponse in different stages on the precision of prevalence estimates in multi-stage survey studies. Based on data from a state level survey, a simulation approach was used to generate datasets with different nonresponse rates in three stages. The margin of error was then compared between the datasets with nonresponse at three different survey stages for 12 outcomes. Results At the same nonresponse rate, the mean margin of error was greater for the data with nonresponse at higher stages. Additionally, as the nonresponse rate increased, precision was more inflated within the data with higher stage nonresponse. This suggests that the effort used to recruit the primary sampling units is more crucial to improve the precision of estimates in multi-stage survey studies.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05840-0NonresponsePrecisionMulti-stage survey study
spellingShingle Ming Ma
Sophie Rosenberg
Alexander M. Kaizer
The impact of nonresponse in different survey stages on the precision of prevalence estimates for multi-stage survey studies
BMC Research Notes
Nonresponse
Precision
Multi-stage survey study
title The impact of nonresponse in different survey stages on the precision of prevalence estimates for multi-stage survey studies
title_full The impact of nonresponse in different survey stages on the precision of prevalence estimates for multi-stage survey studies
title_fullStr The impact of nonresponse in different survey stages on the precision of prevalence estimates for multi-stage survey studies
title_full_unstemmed The impact of nonresponse in different survey stages on the precision of prevalence estimates for multi-stage survey studies
title_short The impact of nonresponse in different survey stages on the precision of prevalence estimates for multi-stage survey studies
title_sort impact of nonresponse in different survey stages on the precision of prevalence estimates for multi stage survey studies
topic Nonresponse
Precision
Multi-stage survey study
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05840-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mingma theimpactofnonresponseindifferentsurveystagesontheprecisionofprevalenceestimatesformultistagesurveystudies
AT sophierosenberg theimpactofnonresponseindifferentsurveystagesontheprecisionofprevalenceestimatesformultistagesurveystudies
AT alexandermkaizer theimpactofnonresponseindifferentsurveystagesontheprecisionofprevalenceestimatesformultistagesurveystudies
AT mingma impactofnonresponseindifferentsurveystagesontheprecisionofprevalenceestimatesformultistagesurveystudies
AT sophierosenberg impactofnonresponseindifferentsurveystagesontheprecisionofprevalenceestimatesformultistagesurveystudies
AT alexandermkaizer impactofnonresponseindifferentsurveystagesontheprecisionofprevalenceestimatesformultistagesurveystudies