Economic costs, health-related quality of life outcomes and cost-utility of a physical and psychological group intervention targeted at older adults with neurogenic claudication

Abstract Background Emerging evidence suggests that structured and progressive exercise underpinned by a cognitive behavioural approach can improve functional outcomes in patients with neurogenic claudication (NC). However, evidence surrounding its economic benefits is lacking. Objectives To estimat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mandy Maredza, Kamran Khan, Ioana R. Marian, Susan J. Dutton, Esther Williamson, Sarah E. Lamb, Stavros Petrou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-02-01
Series:Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00410-y
_version_ 1797845973789048832
author Mandy Maredza
Kamran Khan
Ioana R. Marian
Susan J. Dutton
Esther Williamson
Sarah E. Lamb
Stavros Petrou
author_facet Mandy Maredza
Kamran Khan
Ioana R. Marian
Susan J. Dutton
Esther Williamson
Sarah E. Lamb
Stavros Petrou
author_sort Mandy Maredza
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Emerging evidence suggests that structured and progressive exercise underpinned by a cognitive behavioural approach can improve functional outcomes in patients with neurogenic claudication (NC). However, evidence surrounding its economic benefits is lacking. Objectives To estimate the economic costs, health-related quality of life outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a physical and psychological group intervention (BOOST programme) versus best practice advice (BPA) in older adults with NC. Methods An economic evaluation was conducted based on data from a pragmatic, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial. The base-case economic evaluation took the form of an intention-to-treat analysis conducted from a UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services (PSS) perspective and separately from a societal perspective. Costs (£ 2018–2019 prices) were collected prospectively over a 12 month follow-up period. A bivariate regression of costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with multiple imputation of missing data, was conducted to estimate the incremental cost per QALY gained and the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) of the BOOST programme in comparison to BPA. Sensitivity and pre-specified subgroup analyses explored uncertainty and heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness estimates. Results Participants (N = 435) were randomised to the BOOST programme (n = 292) or BPA (n = 143). Mean (standard error [SE]) NHS and PSS costs over 12 months were £1,974 (£118) in the BOOST arm versus £1,827 (£169) in the BPA arm (p = 0.474). Mean (SE) QALY estimates were 0.620 (0.009) versus 0.599 (0.006), respectively (p = 0.093). The probability that the BOOST programme is cost-effective ranged between 67 and 83% (NHS and PSS perspective) and 79–89% (societal perspective) at cost-effectiveness thresholds between £15,000 and £30,000 per QALY gained. INMBs ranged between £145 and £464 at similar cost-effectiveness thresholds. The cost-effectiveness results remained robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusions The BOOST programme resulted in modest QALY gains over the 12 month follow-up period. Future studies with longer intervention and follow-up periods are needed to address uncertainty around the health-related quality of life impacts and cost-effectiveness of such programmes. Trial registration This study has been registered in the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, reference number ISRCTN12698674. Registered on 10 November 2015.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:47:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d043b7789db04963918e0617f090f4ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1478-7547
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:47:36Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
spelling doaj.art-d043b7789db04963918e0617f090f4ec2023-04-16T11:15:46ZengBMCCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation1478-75472023-02-0121111210.1186/s12962-022-00410-yEconomic costs, health-related quality of life outcomes and cost-utility of a physical and psychological group intervention targeted at older adults with neurogenic claudicationMandy Maredza0Kamran Khan1Ioana R. Marian2Susan J. Dutton3Esther Williamson4Sarah E. Lamb5Stavros Petrou6Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, The University of WarwickWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of WarwickOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of OxfordOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of OxfordOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of OxfordExeter Medical School, University of ExeterNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordAbstract Background Emerging evidence suggests that structured and progressive exercise underpinned by a cognitive behavioural approach can improve functional outcomes in patients with neurogenic claudication (NC). However, evidence surrounding its economic benefits is lacking. Objectives To estimate the economic costs, health-related quality of life outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a physical and psychological group intervention (BOOST programme) versus best practice advice (BPA) in older adults with NC. Methods An economic evaluation was conducted based on data from a pragmatic, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial. The base-case economic evaluation took the form of an intention-to-treat analysis conducted from a UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services (PSS) perspective and separately from a societal perspective. Costs (£ 2018–2019 prices) were collected prospectively over a 12 month follow-up period. A bivariate regression of costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with multiple imputation of missing data, was conducted to estimate the incremental cost per QALY gained and the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) of the BOOST programme in comparison to BPA. Sensitivity and pre-specified subgroup analyses explored uncertainty and heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness estimates. Results Participants (N = 435) were randomised to the BOOST programme (n = 292) or BPA (n = 143). Mean (standard error [SE]) NHS and PSS costs over 12 months were £1,974 (£118) in the BOOST arm versus £1,827 (£169) in the BPA arm (p = 0.474). Mean (SE) QALY estimates were 0.620 (0.009) versus 0.599 (0.006), respectively (p = 0.093). The probability that the BOOST programme is cost-effective ranged between 67 and 83% (NHS and PSS perspective) and 79–89% (societal perspective) at cost-effectiveness thresholds between £15,000 and £30,000 per QALY gained. INMBs ranged between £145 and £464 at similar cost-effectiveness thresholds. The cost-effectiveness results remained robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusions The BOOST programme resulted in modest QALY gains over the 12 month follow-up period. Future studies with longer intervention and follow-up periods are needed to address uncertainty around the health-related quality of life impacts and cost-effectiveness of such programmes. Trial registration This study has been registered in the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, reference number ISRCTN12698674. Registered on 10 November 2015.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00410-yEconomic costsHealth-related quality of lifeCost-effectivenessSpinal stenosisNeurogenic claudicationRehabilitation
spellingShingle Mandy Maredza
Kamran Khan
Ioana R. Marian
Susan J. Dutton
Esther Williamson
Sarah E. Lamb
Stavros Petrou
Economic costs, health-related quality of life outcomes and cost-utility of a physical and psychological group intervention targeted at older adults with neurogenic claudication
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Economic costs
Health-related quality of life
Cost-effectiveness
Spinal stenosis
Neurogenic claudication
Rehabilitation
title Economic costs, health-related quality of life outcomes and cost-utility of a physical and psychological group intervention targeted at older adults with neurogenic claudication
title_full Economic costs, health-related quality of life outcomes and cost-utility of a physical and psychological group intervention targeted at older adults with neurogenic claudication
title_fullStr Economic costs, health-related quality of life outcomes and cost-utility of a physical and psychological group intervention targeted at older adults with neurogenic claudication
title_full_unstemmed Economic costs, health-related quality of life outcomes and cost-utility of a physical and psychological group intervention targeted at older adults with neurogenic claudication
title_short Economic costs, health-related quality of life outcomes and cost-utility of a physical and psychological group intervention targeted at older adults with neurogenic claudication
title_sort economic costs health related quality of life outcomes and cost utility of a physical and psychological group intervention targeted at older adults with neurogenic claudication
topic Economic costs
Health-related quality of life
Cost-effectiveness
Spinal stenosis
Neurogenic claudication
Rehabilitation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00410-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mandymaredza economiccostshealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandcostutilityofaphysicalandpsychologicalgroupinterventiontargetedatolderadultswithneurogenicclaudication
AT kamrankhan economiccostshealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandcostutilityofaphysicalandpsychologicalgroupinterventiontargetedatolderadultswithneurogenicclaudication
AT ioanarmarian economiccostshealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandcostutilityofaphysicalandpsychologicalgroupinterventiontargetedatolderadultswithneurogenicclaudication
AT susanjdutton economiccostshealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandcostutilityofaphysicalandpsychologicalgroupinterventiontargetedatolderadultswithneurogenicclaudication
AT estherwilliamson economiccostshealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandcostutilityofaphysicalandpsychologicalgroupinterventiontargetedatolderadultswithneurogenicclaudication
AT sarahelamb economiccostshealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandcostutilityofaphysicalandpsychologicalgroupinterventiontargetedatolderadultswithneurogenicclaudication
AT stavrospetrou economiccostshealthrelatedqualityoflifeoutcomesandcostutilityofaphysicalandpsychologicalgroupinterventiontargetedatolderadultswithneurogenicclaudication